MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY

, Volume 98, Supplement 1, pp 19–25 | Cite as

Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty: comparative study of functional and radiological outcomes in the treatment of acute proximal humerus fracture

  • P. Baudi
  • G. Campochiaro
  • F. Serafini
  • G. Gazzotti
  • G. Matino
  • C. Rovesta
  • F. Catani
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

To compare functional and radiographic results of reverse prosthesis versus hemiarthroplasty after complex displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients when adequate ORIF cannot be achieved and prosthetic shoulder replacement is required.

Methods

From 2008 to 2012, 67 patients were treated with hemiarthroplasty or reverse arthroplasty. We evaluated 53 cases with an average follow-up of 27.5 months (range 12–64). Twenty-eight patients with an average age of 71.4 years were treated with a hemiarthroplasty and 25 patients with an average age of 77.3 years with a reverse prosthesis. All patients were assessed before and after surgery by Constant–ASES–DASH score, strength in abduction, ER1, ER2, and X-rays.

Results

In hemiarthroplasty group, we observed a mean Constant score of 42.3 pt, ASES score 51.3 pt, and DASH score 46.1, with an average strength of 1.3 lb in abduction and of 3.7 lb in ER1 and 1.8 lb in ER2. In reverse arthroplasty group, we measured a mean Constant of 56.2 pt, ASES 69.3 pt, and DASH score 40.4, with an average strength of 4.3 lb in abduction and of 3.3 lb in ER1 and 3.2 lb in ER2. Radiographically, it is interesting to observe that greater tuberosity healing rate was 37 % in hemiarthroplasty group compared to 84 % in reverse arthroplasty group. About complications, the highest rate was recorded in the hemiarthroplasty group.

Conclusion

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty indication is steadily increasing in acute displaced proximal humeral fracture. Pain and articular movement results appear better than those with hemiarthroplasty. Our data are similar to the international literature.

Keywords

Hemiarthroplasty Reverse shoulder arthroplasty humeral proximal fracture 

Notes

Conflict of interest

P. Baudi, G. Campochiaro, F. Serafini, G. Gazzotti, G. Matino, C. Rovesta, F. Catani declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). All patients provided written informed consent to enrolment in the study and to the inclusion in this article of information that could potentially lead to their identification.

Human & Animal Studies

The study was conducted in accordance with all institutional and national guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals.

References

  1. 1.
    Warner JJP, Costouros JC, Gerber C (2006) Fratture dell’epifisi prossimale dell’omero. Traumatologia dell’adulto, vol.2. Cap.31. Rockwood and GreenGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jakob RP, Kristiansen T, Mayo K et al (1984) Classification and aspects of treatment of fractures of the proximal humerus. BC Decker, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rose SH, Melton LJ, Morey BF et al (1982) Epidemiologic features of humeral fractures. Clin Orthop 168:24–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Min W, Davidovitch RI, Tejwani NC et al (2012) Three- and four-part proximal humerus fractures evolution to operative care. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 70(1):25–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jobin CM, Galatza LM (2012) Proximal humerus fractures: pin, plate, or replace. Semin Arthro 23:74–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mauro CS (2011) Proximal humeral fractures. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 4:214–220PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sirveaux F, Roche O, Molé D (2010) Shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fracture. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96:683–694PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Paavolainen P, Björkenheim JM, Slätis P et al (1983) Operative treatment of severe proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 54(3):374–379PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Olivier H, Largier A, Lajoie D et al (1981) Les fractures de l’extrémité supérieure de l’humérus. In: Cahier d’enseignement de la SOFCOT no 13. Paris: Exp Scientifique Francaise, pp 117–28Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fenichel I, Oran A, Burstein G et al (2006) Percutaneous pinning using threaded pins as a treatment option for unstable two- and three-part fractures of the proximal humerus: a retrospective study. Int Orthop (SICOT) 30:153–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Solberg BD, Moon CN, Franco DP (2009) Locked plating of 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures in older patients: the effect of initial fracture pattern on outcome. J Orthop Trauma 23(2):113–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bastian JD, Hertel R (2009) Osteosynthesis and hemiarthroplasty of fractures of the proximal humerus: outcomes in a consecutive case series. J Should Elb Surg 18:216–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Adedapo AO, Ikpeme JO (2001) The results of internal fixation of three and four part proximal humeral fractures with the Polarus nail. Injury 32:115–121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gerber C, Schneeberger AG, Vinh TS (1990) The arterial vascularization of the humeral head. An anatomical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:1486–1494PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Duparc F, Muller JM, Freger P (2001) Arterial blood supply of the proximal humeral epiphysis. Surg Radiol Anat 23:185–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Meyer C, Alt V, Hassanin H et al (2005) The arteries of the humeral head and their relevance in fracture treatment. Surg Radiol Anat 27:232–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gerber C, Hersche O, Berberat C (1998) The clinical relevance of posttraumatic avascular necrosis of the humeral head. J Should Elb Surg 7:586–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brooks CH, Revell WJ, Heatley FW (1993) Vascularity of the humeral head after proximal humeral fractures. An anatomical cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75(1):132–136PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hertel R, Hempfing A, Stiehler M et al (2004) Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus. J Should Elb Surg 13(4):427–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jakob RP, Miniaci A, Anson PS et al (1991) Four-part valgus-impacted fractures of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:295–298PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Babhulkar A, Shyam AK, Sancheti PK (2011) Hemiarthroplasty for comminuted proximal humeral fractures. J Orthop Surg 19(2):194–199Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Castricini R, De Benedetto M, Pirani P et al (2011) Shoulder hemiarthroplasty for fractures of the proximal humerus. Musculoskelet Surg 95(Suppl 1):S49–S54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sirveaux F, Navez G, Favard L et al (2006) Reverse prosthesis for acute proximal humerus fractures, the multicentric study. Nice shoulder course 2006, Arthroscopy and arthroplasty: current concepts, 1–3 June 2006Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Walch G, Wall B (2006) Synthesis: indications and techniques of revision arthroplasty with a reverse prosthesis. Nice shoulder course 2006, Arthroscopy and arthroplasty: current concepts, 1–3 June 2006Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Molè D, Navez G, Garaud P (2006) Reverse shoulder prosthesis: problems related to the glenoid. Nice shoulder course 2006, Arthroscopy and arthroplasty: current concepts 1–3 June 2006Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Solberg BD, Moon CN, Franco DP et al (2009) Locked plating of 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures in older patients: the effect of initial fracture pattern on outcome. J Orthop Trauma 23(2):113–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bastian JD, Hertel R (2009) Osteosynthesis and hemiarthroplasty of fractures of the proximal humerus: outcomes in a consecutive case series. J Should Elb Surg 18:216–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hurd JL, Zuckerman JD (2009) What is the best treatment for complex proximal humerus fractures? What are the main determinants of outcome after arthroplasty? Chapter 20. Upper extremity topics. Evidence-based orthopaedicsGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hertel R (2005) Fractures of the proximal humerus in osteoporotic bone. Osteoporos Int 16:S65–S72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gronhagen CM, Abbaszadegan H, Revay S et al (2007) Medium-term results after primary hemiarthroplasty for comminute proximal humerus fractures: a study of 46 patients followed up for an average of 4.4 years. J Should Elb Surg 16(6):766–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Noyes MP, Kleinhenz B, Markert R et al (2011) Functional and radiographic long-term outcomes of hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures. J Should Elb Surg 20:372–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Reuther F, Muhlhausler B, Wahl D et al (2010) Functional outcome of shoulder hemiarthroplasty for fractures: a multicentre analysis. Injury Int J Care Inj 41:606–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kralinger F, Schwaiger R, Wambacher M et al (2004) Outcome after primary hemiarthroplasty for fracture of the head of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(2):217–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wretenberg P, Ekelund A (1997) Acute hemiarthroplasty after proximal humerus fracture in old patients. A retrospective evaluation of 18 patients followed for 2–7 years. Acta Orthop Scand 68:121–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Valenti PH, Boutsen D, Nerot C (2001) Delta III reversed prosthesis for osteoarthritis with massive rotator cuff tear: long-term results (>5 years). In: Walch G, Boileau P, Mole P (eds) Shoulder prosthesis: two to ten year follow-up. Sauramps Medical, Montepellier, France, pp 253–259Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Favard L, Sirveaux F, Bicknell R et al (2006) The multicenter study: methodology and presentation. Nice shoulder course 2006. Arthroscopy and arthroplasty: current concepts, 1–3 June 2006Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cazeneuve JF, Hassan Y, Kermad F et al (2008) Delta III reverse-ball-and-socket total shoulder prosthesis for acute complex fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly population. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 18:81–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Klein M, Juschka M, Hinkenjann B (2008) Treatment of comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients with the delta III reverse shoulder prosthesis. J Orthop Trauma 22:698–704PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Macitti T, Leone P, Piscitello S (2011) L’Artroprotesi inversa nel trattamento delle fratture a 3–4 frammenti dell’estremo prossimale dell’omero dell’anziano AITOG OGGI—settembreGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sirveaux F, Favard L, Oudet D et al (2004) Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff. Results of a multicenter study of 80 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:388–395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Young SW, Segal BS, Turner PC et al (2010) Comparison of functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty in the primary treatment of acute proximal humerus fracture. ANZ J Surg 80(11):789–793PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gallinet D, Clappaz P, Garbuio P et al (2009) Three or four parts complex proximal humerus fractures: hemiarthroplasty versus reverse prosthesis: a comparative study of 40 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95:48–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Aldegheri R, Iacobellis C (2009) La sostituzione protesica nelle fratture prossimali d’omero nell’anziano. GIOT 35:6–15Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gallinet D, Adam A, Gasse N et al (2013) Improvement in shoulder rotation in complex shoulder fractures treated by reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Should Elb Surg 22:38–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Garrigues GE, Johnston PS, Pepe MD et al (2013) Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients. Orthopedics 35(5):e703–e708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Cuff DJ, Pupello DR (2013) Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg 95:2050–2055PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Baudi
    • 1
  • G. Campochiaro
    • 1
  • F. Serafini
    • 1
  • G. Gazzotti
    • 2
  • G. Matino
    • 1
  • C. Rovesta
    • 1
  • F. Catani
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryPoliclinico Modena UniversityModenaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryArcispedale S. Maria Nuova Azienda Ospedaliera di Reggio EmiliaReggio EmiliaItaly

Personalised recommendations