Advertisement

MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY

, Volume 95, Issue 1, pp 1–5 | Cite as

Heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty: our experience

  • A. SpinarelliEmail author
  • V. Patella
  • M. Petrera
  • A. Abate
  • V. Pesce
  • S. Patella
Original Article

Abstract

Heterotopic ossification is a condition characterized by the presence of mature lamellar bone and often bone marrow in soft tissues surrounding a major joint. It represents a common complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The etiology and predisposing factors are not completely known, but some authors reported that the implant of a non-cemented prosthesis seems to be associated with a greater incidence of HO. Two hundred and two non-cemented total hip arthroplasties were performed between October 1997 and February 2002. The mean age was 70.2 years. The average follow-up for 181 hips included in the study was 96 months (range, 72–120 months). A standard lateral approach (Hardinge) was performed for the implant of a non-cemented femoral component and a non-cemented acetabular component. Radiographs were done before and after surgery, at 1, 4 and 12 months postop, then every year. The incidence of HO was assessed in the antero-posterior view at each interval and graded according to Brooker classification. Out of 181 implants, HO was observed in 52 hips (28,7%). Heterotopic bone was graded as class I in 32 (17.7%) hips, class II in 14 (7.73%) hips, class III in 6 (3,3%) hips and class IV in none (0%). The mean preoperative Harris hip score was 48; at the last follow-up, the mean postoperative score was preoperatively to a mean of 89 points (range, 76–97 points) in HO Hip and of 91 points (range, 78–100 points) in the other Hip. In our experience, non-cemented THA led to a higher incidence of class I and II HO according to Brooker Classification, the incidence of HO is comparable to the rates reported in recent studies about the HO finding after a non-cemented THA, the importance of clinical symptoms in the presence of HO is very low.

Keywords

Para-articular ossification  Heterotopic ossification Brooker classification Non-cemented THA 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to the publication of this manuscript and that no financial grants have been received for the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Rosendahl S, Christoffersen JK, Norgaard M (1977) Pararticular ossification following total hip replacement: 70 arthroplasties ad modum Moore using Mc Farland’s approach. Acta Orthop Scand 48(4):400–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lazansky MG (1973) Complications revisited: the debit side of total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 95:96–103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pai VS (1994) Heterotopic ossification in total hip arthroplasty: the influence of the approach. J Arthroplasty 9(2):199–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gebuhr P, Sletgård J, Dalsgård J et al (1996) Heterotopic ossification after hip arthroplasty: a randomised double bind multicentric study with tenoxicam in 147 hips. Acta Orthop Scand 67(1):29–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ling R (1994) Complications of total hip replacement. Churchill Livingstone, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ritter MA, Gioe TJ (1982) The effect of indomethacin on para-articular ectopic ossification following total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 167:113–117PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Purtill JJ, Eng K, Rothman RH, Hozack VJ (1996) Heterotopic ossification: incidence in cemented vs cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 11(1):58–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sawyer JR, Myers MA, Rosier RN et al (1991) Heterotopic ossification: Clinical and cellular aspects. Calcif Tissue Int 49:208–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    DeLee J, Ferrari A, Charnley J (1976) Ectopic bone formation following low friction arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res:53–59Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eggli S, Woo A (2001) Risk factors for heterotopic ossification in total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 121:531–535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maloney-WJ Krushell-RJ, Jasty-M Harris-WH (1991) Incidence of heterotopic ossification after total hip replacement: effect of the type of fixation of the femoral component. J-Bone-Joint-Surg-Am 73(2):191–193PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thomas B (1992) Heterotopic bone formation after total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 23(2):347–358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sneath RJ, Bindi FD, Davies J, Parnell EJ (2001) The effect of pulsed irrigation on the incidence of heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16(5):547–551PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chalmers J, Gray D, Rush J (1975) Observation on the induction of bone in soft tissue. J Bone Joint Surg Br 57(1):36–45PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Duck HJ, Mylod AG Jr (1992) Heterotopic bone in hip arthroplasties: cemented versus noncemented. Clin. Orthop 282:145–153Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lieberman IH, Moran E, Hastings DE, Bogoch ER (1994) Heterotopic ossification after primary cemented and non cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Can J Surg 37:135–139PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vincent D, Pellegrini JR, Gregoritch JS (1996) Preoperative irradiation for prevention of heterotopic ossification following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 78:870–881Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Balboni TA, Gobezie R, Mamon HJ (2006) Heterotopic ossification: Pathophysiology, clinical features and the role of radiotherapy for prophylaxis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66(5):1597–1598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Balboni TA, Gaccione P, Gobezie R, Mamon HJ (2007) Shielding of the hip prosthesis during radiation therapy for heterotopic ossification is associated with increased failure of prophylaxis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67(5):1499–1505PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55(8):1629–1632PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Spinarelli
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • V. Patella
    • 1
  • M. Petrera
    • 1
  • A. Abate
    • 1
  • V. Pesce
    • 1
  • S. Patella
    • 1
  1. 1.2nd Unit of Orthopaedic and TraumaUniversity of BariBariItaly
  2. 2.Unità Operativa di Ortopedia e Traumatologia IIAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Consorziale di BariBariItaly

Personalised recommendations