Advertisement

Biosemiotics

pp 1–26 | Cite as

I Am a Fake Loop: the Effects of Advertising-Based Artificial Selection

  • Yogi Hale Hendlin
Article

Abstract

Mimicry is common among animals, plants, and other kingdoms of life. Humans in late capitalism, however, have devised an unique method of mimicking the signs that trigger evolutionarily-programmed instincts of their own species in order to manipulate them. Marketing and advertising are the most pervasive and sophisticated forms of known human mimicry, deliberately hijacking our instincts in order to select on the basis of one dimension only: profit. But marketing and advertising also strangely undermine their form of mimicry, deceiving both the intended targets and the signaler simultaneously. Human forms of mimicry have the regular consequence of deceiving the imitator, reducing meta-cognitive awareness of the act and intentions surrounding such deception. Therefore, the deceiver in the end deceives himself as well as intended targets. Drawing on scholarship applying Niko Tinbergen’s ethological discovery of supernormal stimuli in animals to humans, this article analyzes sophisticated mass mimicry in contemporary culture, in both intended and unintended forms.

Keywords

Supernormal stimuli Deceptive semiosis Human Umwelt Evolutionarily disadvantageous mimicry Niko Tinbergen 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alexander, B. (2010). The globalization of addiction: A study in poverty of the spirit. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alter, A. (2017). Irresistible: The rise of addictive technology and the business of keeping us hooked. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, P. M., & Butcher, K. E. (2006). Childhood obesity: Trends and potential causes. The Future of Children, 16, 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Appelbaum B (2018) Is Bitcoin a Waste of Electricity, or Something Worse? In: New York Times. https://nyti.ms/2FEfJzh. Accessed 28 Feb 2018.
  5. Appiah, K. A. (2010). Experiments in ethics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Arendt, H. (1977). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil, later printing edition. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  7. Aristotle. (1999). Nicomachean ethics (2nd ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  8. Babich, B. E. (2013). The Hallelujah effect: philosophical reflections on music, performance practice, and technology. Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  9. Barber, B. R. (2008). Consumed: How markets corrupt children, infantilize adults, and swallow citizens whole, reprint edition. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  10. Bargh, J., & Chartrand, T. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462–479.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barrett, D. (2010). Supernormal stimuli: How primal urges overran their evolutionary purpose (1st ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  12. Bateson, G. (2000). Steps to an ecology of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation, 14th printing edition. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  14. Benjamin, W. (1969). Illuminations: Essays and reflections. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
  15. Bennett, T. J. (2015). The semiotic life cycle and the symbolic species. Sign Systems Studies, 43, 446.  https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2015.43.4.05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bennett TJ (2016) Dark romance: Necrosemiotic axioloy and the semiotic life cycle. In: Conference Proceedings. International Society for Biosemiotic Studies, Prague.Google Scholar
  17. Bennett, D., Bellinger, D. C., Birnbaum, L. S., Bradman, A., Chen, A., Cory-Slechta, D. A., Engel, S. M., Fallin, M. D., Halladay, A., Hauser, R., Hertz-Picciotto, I., Kwiatkowski, C. F., Lanphear, B. P., Marquez, E., Marty, M., McPartland, J., Newschaffer, C. J., Payne-Sturges, D., Patisaul, H. B., Perera, F. P., Ritz, B., Sass, J., Schantz, S. L., Webster, T. F., Whyatt, R. M., Woodruff, T. J., Zoeller, R. T., Anderko, L., Campbell, C., Conry, J. A., DeNicola, N., Gould, R. M., Hirtz, D., Huffling, K., Landrigan, P. J., Lavin, A., Miller, M., Mitchell, M. A., Rubin, L., Schettler, T., Tran, H. L., Acosta, A., Brody, C., Miller, E., Miller, P., Swanson, M., Witherspoon, N. O., American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), Child Neurology Society, Endocrine Society, International Neurotoxicology Association, International Society for Children’s Health and the Environment, International Society for Environmental Epidemiology, National Council of Asian Pacific Islander Physicians, National Hispanic Medical Association, & National Medical Association. (2016). Project TENDR: Targeting environmental neuro-developmental risks the TENDR consensus statement. Environmental Health Perspectives, 124, A118–A122.  https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP358.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Bernays, E. L. (1928). Propaganda. New York: H. Liveright.Google Scholar
  19. Buchanan, B. (2008). Onto-ethologies: The animal environments of Uexküll, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, and Deleuze. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  20. Byrne, R. W. (2012). From parsing actions to understanding intentions. In T. Schilhab, F. Stjernfelt, & T. Deacon (Eds.), The symbolic species evolved (pp. 131–150). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Christakis, D. A. (2006). The hidden and potent effects of television advertising. JAMA, 295, 1698–1699.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.14.1698.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Christakis, D. A. (2010). Infant media viewing: First, do no harm. Pediatric Annals, 39, 578–582.  https://doi.org/10.3928/00904481-20100825-10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Comaroff, J., & Comaroff, J. (1992). Ethnography and the historical imagination (1st ed.). Boulder: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Cross, G. S., & Proctor, R. N. (2014). Packaged pleasures: How technology and marketing revolutionized desire (1st ed.). Chicago; London: University Of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Damasio, A. R., & Rudrauf, D. (2006). The biological basis of subjectivity: A hypothesis. In U. Kriegel & K. Williford (Eds.), Self-representational approaches to consciousness (pp. 423–464). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. DiClemente, C. C. (2018). Addiction and change, second edition: How addictions develop and addicted people recover (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  27. Dobson, A. (2014). Listening for democracy: Recognition, representation, reconciliation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eagleton, T. (2007). Ideology: An introduction (2nd ed.). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  29. Eco, U. (1992). Interpretation and overinterpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. El-Hani, C. N., Queiroz, J., & Stjernfelt, F. (2010). Firefly femmes fatales: A case study in the semiotics of deception. Biosemiotics, 3, 33–55.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-009-9048-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fraser, N. (1997). Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the “postsocialist” condition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Friedberg, A. (2009). The virtual window: From Alberti to Microsoft. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Garz, M., Sorensen, J., & Stone, D. F. (2018). Congeniality and news demand: Evidence from Facebook. SSRN Electronic Journal.  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3102249.
  34. Glaser A (2018) John Perry Barlow gave internet activists only half of the mission they need. In: Slate Magazine. https://slate.com/technology/2018/02/john-perry-barlow-gave-internet-activists-only-half-the-mission-they-need.html. Accessed 14 Feb 2018.
  35. Goleman, D., & Davidson, R. J. (2017). Altered traits: Science reveals how meditation changes your mind, brain, and body. New York: Avery.Google Scholar
  36. Gunderson, L. H., & Holling, C. S. (2002). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
  37. Haldane, J. B. S. (1932). The causes of evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Haramia, C. (2014). Why we should stop creating pets with lives worth living. Between the species: An online journal for the study of philosophy and. Animals, 18, 75–91.Google Scholar
  39. Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  40. Hastings, G. (2012a). The marketing matrix: how the corporation gets its power and how we can reclaim it. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Hastings, G. (2012b). Why corporate power is a public health priority. BMJ, 345, e5124.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5124.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Hendlin, Y. H. (2016). Multiplicity and welt. Sign Systems Studies, 44, 94.  https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2016.44.1-2.06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hendlin, Y., Anderson, S. J., & Glantz, S. A. (2010). “Acceptable rebellion”: Marketing hipster aesthetics to sell Camel cigarettes in the US. Tobacco Control, 19, 213–222.  https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2009.032599.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Hetherington, K., & Lee, N. (2000). Social order and the blank figure. Environment and Planning D, 18, 169–184.  https://doi.org/10.1068/d215t.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hoffmeyer, J. (1997). Biosemiotics: Towards a new synthesis in biology. European Journal for Semiotic Studies, 9, 355–376.Google Scholar
  46. Hoffmeyer, J. (2008). Biosemiotics: an examination into the signs of life and the life of signs. Scranton: University of Scranton Press.Google Scholar
  47. Hofstadter, D. R. (1979). Gödel, Escher, Bach: An eternal Golden braid, fifth printing edition. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  48. Hofstadter, D. R. (2007). I am a strange loop, reprint edition. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  49. Hong, S.-B., Kim, J.-W., Choi, E.-J., Kim, H. H., Suh, J. E., Kim, C. D., Klauser, P., Whittle, S., Yűcel, M., Pantelis, C., & Yi, S. H. (2013). Reduced orbitofrontal cortical thickness in male adolescents with internet addiction. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 9, 11.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-9-11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Illing S (2017) Cambridge Analytica, the shady data firm that might be a key Trump-Russia link, explained. In: Vox. https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/10/16/15657512/mueller-fbi-cambridge-analytica-trump-russia. Accessed 13 Feb 2018.
  51. Juarrero, A. (1999). Dynamics in action: Intentional behavior as a complex system. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  52. Kessler, D. A. (2010). The end of overeating: Taking control of the insatiable American appetite, reprint edition. New York: Rodale Books.Google Scholar
  53. Klein, N. (2008). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism (1st ed.). London: Picador.Google Scholar
  54. Knabb, K., & Paul Avrich Collection (Library of Congress) (Eds.). (1981). Situationist International anthology. Berkeley: Bureau of Public Secrets.Google Scholar
  55. Kubey, R. (1996). Television dependence, diagnosis, and prevention: With commentary on video games, pornography, and media education. In T. Macbeth (Ed.), Tuning in to young viewers: Social science perspectives on television. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, p. 221–260.Google Scholar
  56. Kühn, S., Schubert, F., & Gallinat, J. (2010). Reduced thickness of medial orbitofrontal cortex in smokers. Biological Psychiatry, 68, 1061–1065.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.08.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Laland, K. N., Uller, T., Feldman, M. W., Sterelny, K., Müller, G. B., Moczek, A., Jablonka, E., & Odling-Smee, J. (2015). The extended evolutionary synthesis: Its structure, assumptions and predictions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282, 20151019.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1019.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Lee, D.-H., Jacobs, D. R., & Porta, M. (2009). Hypothesis: A unifying mechanism for nutrition and chemicals as lifelong modulators of DNA Hypomethylation. Environmental Health Perspectives, 117, 1799–1802.  https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0900741.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Leopold, A. (1949). A sand county Almanac. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Leslie I (2016) The sugar conspiracy. The Guardian. Section: Society. http://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/apr/07/the-sugar-conspiracy-robert-lustig-john-yudkin. Accessed 19 Feb 2017.
  61. Lustig, R. (2017). The hacking of the American mind: The science behind the corporate takeover of our bodies and brains. New York: Avery.Google Scholar
  62. Macy, J. (1991). Mutual causality in Buddhism and general systems theory: The dharma of natural systems. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  63. Mander, J. (1978). Four arguments for the elimination of television, reprint edition. New York: William Morrow Paperbacks.Google Scholar
  64. Maran, T. (2013). Enchantment of the past and semiocide. Remembering Ivar Puura. Sign Systems Studies, 41.  https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2013.41.1.09.
  65. McGilchrist, I. (2009). The master and his emissary. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self & society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  67. Mendelson, E. (2014). The secret Auden. New York: The New York Review of Books. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2014/03/20/secret-auden/
  68. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The visible and the invisible: Followed by working notes. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Montgomery, K., Chester, J., Nixon, L., Levy, L., & Dorfman, L. (2017). Big data and the transformation of food and beverage marketing: Undermining efforts to reduce obesity? Critical Public Health, 0, 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2017.1392483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Nestle, M., & Pollan, M. (2013). Food politics: How the food industry influences nutrition and health, rev exp edition. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  71. Noble, D. (2008). The music of life: Biology beyond genes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Page, R. M., & Brewster, A. (2009). Depiction of food as having drug-like properties in televised food advertisements directed at children: Portrayals as pleasure enhancing and addictive. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 23, 150–157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2008.01.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Palmer, C., & Larson, B. M. H. (2014). Should we move the Whitebark pine? Assisted migration, ethics and global environmental change. Environmental Values, 23, 641–662.  https://doi.org/10.3197/096327114X13947900181833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pettit, P. (2008). Akrasia, collective and individual. In S. Stroud & C. Tappolet (Eds.), Weakness of will and practical irrationality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Proctor, R. (2008). Agnotology: A missing term to describe the cultural production of ignorance (and its study). In R. Proctor & L. L. Schiebinger (Eds.), Agnotology: The making and unmaking of ignorance (pp. 1–36). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Proctor, R. N. (2012). Golden holocaust: Origins of the cigarette catastrophe and the case for abolition (1st ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  77. Puura, I. (2013). Nature in our memory. Sign Systems Studies, 41, 150–153.  https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2013.41.1.10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rajchman, J. (2000). The Deleuze connections (1st ed.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  79. Rochat, P. (2009). Others in mind: Social origins of self-consciousness. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Roughgarden, J., Gilbert, S. F., Rosenberg, E., Zilber-Rosenberg, I., & Lloyd, E. A. (2018). Holobionts as units of selection and a model of their population dynamics and evolution. Biological Theory, 13, 44–65.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-017-0287-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sapolsky, R. M. (2017). Behave: The biology of humans at our best and worst. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  82. Schechner, R. (2006). Performance studies: An introduction (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  83. Serres, M. (2010). Malfeasance: Appropriation through pollution? (1st ed.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Shamir, R. (2008). The age of responsibilization: On market-embedded morality. Economy and Society, 37, 1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140701760833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Smith, D. L. (2012). Less than human: Why we demean, enslave, and exterminate others (1st ed.). New York: St. Martin’s Griffin.Google Scholar
  86. Stjernfelt, F. (2007). Diagrammatology: An investigation on the borderlines of phenomenology, ontology, and semiotics. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Stjernfelt, F. (2014). Natural propositions: The actuality of Peirce’s doctrine of Dicisigns. Boston: Docent Press.Google Scholar
  88. Stuckler, D., & Siegel, K. (2011). Sick societies: Responding to the global challenge of chronic disease. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Takeuchi, H., Taki, Y., Hashizume, H., Asano, K., Asano, M., Sassa, Y., Yokota, S., Kotozaki, Y., Nouchi, R., & Kawashima, R. (2015). The impact of television viewing on brain structures: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Cerebral Cortex, 25, 1188–1197.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht315.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Tinbergen, N. (1951). The study of instinct. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  91. Tønnessen, M., Beever, J., & Hendlin, Y. (2015). Introducing biosemiotic ethics. Zeitschrift für Semiotik, 37, 3–12.Google Scholar
  92. Tufekci, Z. (2018). It’s the (Democracy-Poisoning) Golden Age of Free Speech. In: Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/free-speech-issue-tech-turmoil-new-censorship/. Accessed 14 Feb 2018.
  93. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1993). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  94. Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Wright, R. (2005). A short history of progress. New York: Carroll & Graf Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Erasmus School of PhilosophyErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamNetherlands

Personalised recommendations