Macroevolutionary Freezing and the Janusian Nature of Evolvability: Is the Evolution (of Profound Biological Novelty) Going to End?
- 133 Downloads
In a macroevolutionary timescale, evolvability itself evolves. Lineages are sorted based on their ability to generate adaptive novelties, which leads to the optimization of their genotype-phenotype map. The system of translation of genetic or epigenetic changes to the phenotype may reach significant horizontal and vertical complexity, and may even exhibit certain aspects of learning behaviour. This continuously evolving semiotic system probably enables the origin of complex yet functional and internally compatible adaptations. However, it also has a second, “darker”, side. As was pointed out by several authors, the same process gradually reduces the probability of the origination of significant evolutionary novelties. In a similar way to the evolution of societies, teachings, or languages, in which the growing number of internal linkages gradually solidifies their overall structure and the structure or interpretation of their constitutive elements, the evolutionary potential of lineages decreases during biological evolution. Possible adaptations become limited to small “peripheral” modifications. According to the Frozen Evolution theory, some of the proximate causes of this “macroevolutionary freezing” are more pronounced or present exclusively in sexual lineages. Sorting based on the highest (remaining) evolvability probably leads to the establishment of certain structural features of complex organisms, e.g. the modular character of their development and morphology. However, modules also “macroevolutionary freeze” whereas the hypothetical “thawing” of modules or their novel adaptive combinations becomes rarer and rarer. Some possible ways out of this dead end include the rearrangement of individual development, e.g. neoteny, radical simplification, i.e. sacculinization, and transition to a higher level of organization, e.g. symbiosis or symbiogenesis. The evolution of evolvability is essentially a biosemiotic process situated at the intersection of the genocentric modern synthesis and the evo-devo-centric extended synthesis. Therefore, evolvability may eventually connect these three not necessarily contradictory approaches.
KeywordsEvolvability Evolutionary theory Extended synthesis Macroevolution Stability-based sorting Frozen evolution theory
We thank Charlie Lotterman for the final revisions of our text.
This work was supported by the Grant Agency of the Charles University in Prague (project no: 578416); and the Charles University Research Centre (UNCE 204004). The funding sources had no role in study design, the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, the writing of the report and in the decision to submit the article for publication.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Arthur, W. (1982). A developmental approach to the problem of variation in evolutionary rates. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 18(3), 243–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1982.tb02038.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Arthur, W. (1984). Mechanisms of morphological evolution: A combined genetic, developmental, and ecological approach. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Bonner, J. (1988). The evolution of complexity by means of natural selection. Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Brigandt, I. (2015). From developmental constraint to evolvability: How concepts figure in explanation and disciplinary identity. In A. Love (Ed.), Conceptual change in biology (pp. 305–352). Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media.Google Scholar
- Budd, G., & Jackson, I. (2016). Ecological innovations in the Cambrian and the origins of the crown group phyla (article). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 371(1685). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0287,20150287.
- Calcott, B., & Sterelny, K. (2001). The major transitions in evolution revisited. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Callebaut, W., & Rasskin-Gutman, D. (2005). Modularity: Understanding the development and evolution of natural complex systems. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Davies, A. (2014) On the interaction of function, constraint and complexity in evolutionary systems (Doctoral disertation). University of Southampton.Google Scholar
- Dawkins, R. (1976). Selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Dawkins, R. (1989). The evolution of evolvability. In Langton (Ed.), Artificial life (Santa Fe institute studies in the sciences of complexity, Vol. VI) (pp. 201–220). Redwood City, California: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- de Beer, G. (1954). Archaeopteryx lithographica: A study based upon the British museum specimen. London: Trustees of the British Museum.Google Scholar
- Dennett, D. (1995). Darwin's dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York, USA: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
- Eble, G. (1998). The role of development in evolutionary radiations. In M. McKinney & J. Drake (Eds.), Biodiversity dynamics: Turnover of populations, taxa, and communities (pp. 132–161). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Eble, G. (2005). Morphological modularity and macroevolution: Conceptual and empirical aspects. In W. Callebaut, & R.-G. D (Eds.), Modularity: Understanding the development and evolution of natural complex systems (pp. 221–238). Cambridge, London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Espinosa-Soto, C. (2014). Evolution of modularity. In M. Benítez, O. Miramontes, & A. Valiente-Banuet (Eds.), Frontiers in ecology, evolution and complexity. CopIt-arXives: Mexico City, Mexico.Google Scholar
- Flegr, J. (1998). On the "origin" of natural selection by means of speciation. Rivista Di Biologia-Biology Forum, 91(2), 291–304.Google Scholar
- Flegr, J. (2010). Elastic, not plastic species: Frozen plasticity theory and the origin of adaptive evolution in sexually reproducing organisms. Biology Direct, 5, −. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-5-2.
- Flegr, J. (2013). Microevolutionary, macroevolutionary, ecological and taxonomical implications of punctuational theories of adaptive evolution. Biology Direct, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-8-1.
- Flegr, J. (2015). Evoluční tání aneb O původu rodů. (On the Origin of Genera). Prague: Academia.Google Scholar
- Gerhart, J., & Kirschner, M. (2007). The theory of facilitated variation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 8582-8589. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701035104.
- Gould, S. (1989). Wonderful life: The burgess shale and the nature of history. New York, London: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
- Haiyang, H., Masahiro, U., Song, G., Kotaro, S., Tsai-Ming, L., Fang, L., et al. (2017). Constrained vertebrate evolution by pleiotropic genes. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 1(11), 1722–1730. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0318-0.
- Ikemoto, Y., & Sekiyama, K. (2014). Modular network evolution under selection for robustness to noise. Physical Review E, 89(4). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.89.042705.
- Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. (2005). Evolution in four dimensions. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Kirschner, M., & Gerhart, J. (2005). The plausibility of life: Resolving Darwin's dilemma. New Haven, USA: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Laland, K., Uller, T., Feldman, M., Sterelny, K., Müller, G. B., Moczek, A., Jablonka, E., Odling-Smee, J., Wray, G. A., Hoekstra, H. E., Futuyma, D. J., Lenski, R. E., Mackay, T. F. C., Schluter, D., & Strassmann, J. E. (2014). Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? Nature, 514(7521), 161–164. https://doi.org/10.1038/514161a.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Laland, K., Uller, T., Fellman, M., Sterelny, K., Muller, G., Moczek, A., et al. (2015). The extended evolutionary synthesis: Its structure, assumptions and predictions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 282(1813). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1019
- Margulis, L., & Fester, R. (1991). Symbiosis as a source of evolutionary innovation: Speciation and morphogenesis. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Markoš, A. (2015). The birth and life of species–cultures. Biosemiotics, 9(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-015-9252-1.
- Maynard Smith, J., & Szathmáry, E. (2010). The major transitions in evolution. New York: Oxford University Press Inc..Google Scholar
- Mayr, E. (2003). The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. In Cambridge, Massacusetts. London, UK: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- McShea, D. (2001a). The hierarchical structure of organisms: A scale and documentation of a trend in the maximum. Paleobiology, 27(2), 405–423. https://doi.org/10.1666/0094-8373(2001)027<0405:THSOOA>2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- OED Online. (2017). "evolvability, n.". Online: Oxford University Press. www.oed.com/view/Entry/269743. Accessed 25 September 2017.
- Pepper, J. (2000). The evolution of modularity in genome architecture. In C. Maley, & E. Boudreau (Eds.), Artificial Life 7 Workshop Proceedings (pp. 9–12).Google Scholar
- Rasnicyn, A. (2005). Collected works in evolutionary biology (Izbrannye trudy po evolucionnoj biologii). Moscow: Tovarisevstvo naucnych izdanii KMK.Google Scholar
- Rasskin-Gutman, D. (2005). Modularity: Jumping forms within morphospace. In W. Callebaut, & R.-G. D (Eds.), Modularity: Understanding the development and evolution of natural complex systems (pp. 207–219). Cambridge, London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Riedl, R. (1978). Order in living organisms: A systems analysis of evolution. New York, USA: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Rosa, D. (1899). La Riduzione progressiva della variabilità e i suoi rapporti coll'estinzione e coll'origine delle specie. Torino: Clausen.Google Scholar
- Schank, J., & Wimsatt, W. (1986). (1986). Generative entrenchment and evolution. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association Number Two: Symposia and Invited Papers, 1986, 33–60.Google Scholar
- Schlosser, G. (2004). The role of modules in development and evolution. In G. Schlosser & G. Wagner (Eds.), Modularity in development and evolution (pp. 519–582). Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Schlosser, G., & Wagner, G. (2004). Modularity in development and evolution. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Shcherbakov, V. (2013). Biological species as a form of existence, the higher form. In I. Pavlinov (Ed.), The species problem - ongoing issues (pp. 65–91). Rijeka, Croatia: InTech.Google Scholar
- Simon, H. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106(6), 467–482.Google Scholar
- Thomas, R. (2005). Hierarchical integration of modular structures in the evolution of animal skeletons. In W. Callebaut, & R.-G. D (Eds.), Modularity: Understanding the development and evolution of natural complex systems (pp. 239–258). Cambridge, London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Turney, P. (1999) 'Increasing Evolvability considered as a large-scale trend in evolution' Proceedings of the 1999 genetic and evolutionary computation conference (GECCO-99). Orlando, FL: National Research Council of Canada.Google Scholar
- von Uexküll, J. (1909). Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. Berlin: J. Springer.Google Scholar
- Wagner, A. (2005). Robustness and evolvability in living systems. Princeton, USA: University Press Princeton.Google Scholar
- Wagner, G., Mezey, J., & Calabretta, R. (2005). Natural selection and the origin of modules. In W. Callebaut & D. Rasskin-Gutman (Eds.), Modularity: Understanding the development and evolution of natural complex systems (pp. 33–49). Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Watson, R., Mills, R., Buckley, C., Kouvaris, K., Jackson, A., Powers, S., et al. (2016). Evolutionary connectionism: Algorithmic principles underlying the evolution of biological organisation in Evo-Devo, Evo-eco and evolutionary transitions. Evolutionary Biology, 43(4), 553–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-015-9358-z.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- West-Eberhard, M. (2003). Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wimsatt, W., & Schank, J. (2004). Generative entrenchment, modularity, and evolvability: When genic selection meets the whole organism. In G. Schlosser & G. Wagner (Eds.), Modularity in development and evolution (pp. 359–394). Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar