Advertisement

Biosemiotics

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 193–210 | Cite as

Consciousness is Cheap, Even if Symbols are Expensive; Metabolism and the Brain’s Dark Energy

  • Seán O NualláinEmail author
  • Tom Doris
Original Paper

Abstract

Use of symbols, the key to the biosemiotics field as to many others, required bigger brains which implied a promissory note for greater energy consumption; symbols are obviously expensive. A score years before the current estimate of 18–20% for the human brain’s metabolic demand on the organism, it was known that neural tissue is metabolically dear. This paper first discusses two evolutionary responses to this demand, on both of which there is some consensus. The first, assigning care of altricial infants with burgeoning brains (and in human infants the metabolic demand peaks at 65% of the total) to “allomothers” is not unique to humans. The second, using relatively small neurons as primates do, risks misfires past a certain minimal value. Moreover, in apparent paradox, there is an increasing consensus that large “Von Economo” neurons are critical for communication. This paper’s main contribution is the discussion of two further evolutionary tricks. The first is the use of self-similarity in the cortex, both in structure and process, to allow the cortex readily—and in energetic terms, parsimoniously—to shift between states in a high-dimensional space. This leads to discussion of the kind of formalism appropriate to model these shifts, a formalism which—it is tentatively suggested—may do double duty for the modeling of symbolic thought. The second trick is the superimposition on the background “white noise” of neural firing of EEG-detected waves like gamma. The paper describes a method, using the Hilbert transform, of calculating the dips in energy consumption as the brain is transitioned by gamma waves. It is hypothesized that consciousness may be a spandrel, the incidental result of a neurodynamic imperative that the brain enter a maximally sensitive (in sensory terms) “zero power” state a few times a second. If that is the case, then there are obvious benefits for health in meditation, which can be viewed as a state of consciousness extended over time by limiting afferent stimuli.

Keywords

Neurodynamics Thermodynamics Evolution Consciousness Biosemiotics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to Marcello Barbieri for his encouragement, and to Tom Doris and Hal Cox for fruitful discussions

References

  1. Blascovich, J., & Bailenson, J. (2011). Infinite reality avatars, eternal life, new worlds, and the dawn of the virtual revolution William Morrow.Google Scholar
  2. Carhart-Harris, R. L., & Friston, K. J. (2010). The default-mode, ego-functions and free-energy: a neurobiological account of Freudian ideas. Brain, 133(Pt 4), 1265–1283. Epub 2010 Feb 28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Doris, T., & O Nualláin, S. (in preparation). “Informational complexity of seizures and the resting and sleeping brain”.Google Scholar
  4. Dunbar, R. I. M. (2003). The social brain: mind, language, and society in evolutionary perspective. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32, 163–181. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fox, D. (2011). The limits of intelligence (pp. 36–43). Scientific American, July 2011.Google Scholar
  6. Freeman, W. (2007). Hilbert transform for brain waves. Scholarpedia, 2(1), 1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Freeman, W. (2008). A pseudo-equilibrium thermodynamic model of information processing in nonlinear brain dynamics. Neural Networks, 21(2–3), 257–265.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Freeman, W., O’Nuallain, S., & Rodriguez, J. (2008). Simulating cortical background electrocortigram at rest with filtered noise. Journal of Integrated Neuroscience, 7(3), 337–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127–138. Epub 2010 Jan 13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Isler, K. (2011). Energetic trade-offs between brain size and offspring production: marsupials confirm a general mammalian pattern. BioEssays, 33(3). doi: 10.1002/bies.201000123.
  11. Isler, K., & van Schaik, C. P. (2006). Metabolic costs of brain size evolution. Biology Letters, 2(4), 557–560.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Isler, K., & van Schaik, C. P. (2009a). The Expensive Brain: a framework for explaining evolutionary changes in brain size. Journal of Human Evolution, 57(4), 392–400. Epub 2009 Sep 3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Isler, K., & van Schaik, C. P. (2009b). Why are there so few smart mammals (but so many smart birds)? Biology Letters, 5, 125–129.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jouny, C. C., Bergey, G. K., & Franaszczuk, P. J. (2010). Partial seizures are associated with early increases in signal complexity. Clinical Neurophysiology, 121(1), 7–13. Epub 2009 Nov 11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Montague, R. (2008). Your brain is (almost) perfect. NY: Perseus.Google Scholar
  16. O Nualláin, S. (1994). Some consequences of current scientific treatments of consciousness and selfhood. AI and Society, 8(4), 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. O Nualláin, S. (Ed.) (2000). Spatial cognition (ed.) (Benjamins).Google Scholar
  18. O Nualláin, S. (2003). The search for mind (3rd ed.). Intellect.Google Scholar
  19. O Nualláin, S. (2004). Being human: the search for order (Intellect, 2004) (2nd ed.).Google Scholar
  20. O Nualláin, S. (2006). Inner and outer empiricism in consciousness research. In New ideas in psychology (Vol. 24, Issue 1, pp. 30–40).Google Scholar
  21. O Nualláin, S. (2008a). Subjects and objects. Biosemiotics, 2, 239–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. O Nualláin, S. (2008b). “Remarks on the foundations of Biology” at “Cosmos and History: special issue on ‘What is life?’” (vol 4, N. 1–2).Google Scholar
  23. O Nualláin, S. (2009). Zero power and selflessness. Cognitive Sciences, 4(2).Google Scholar
  24. O Nualláin, S. (2010). Ask not what you can do for yourself: Cartesian chaos, neural dynamics, and immunological cognition. Biosemiotics, 3(1). doi: 10.1007/s12304-009-9070-4.
  25. O Nualláin, S. (forthcoming). “Neural correlates of consciousness of what?” New ideas in psychology.Google Scholar
  26. O Nualláin, S., & Strohman, R. (2007). Genome and natural language. In Witzany (Ed.), Proceedings of Biosemiotics 2006 (pp. 249–260). Umweb: Helsinki.Google Scholar
  27. O Nualláin, S., McKevitt, P., & Mac Aogain, E. (Eds.) (1997). Two Sciences of Mind: Readings in Cognitive Science and Consciousness. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. xi + 498pp.Google Scholar
  28. Ouspensky, P. (1977). In search of the miraculous. Orlando: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  29. Pellionisz, A., & Llinás, R. (1979). Cerebellar coordination: covariant analysis and contravariant synthesis via metric tensor. A tensorial approach to the geometry of brain function. Neuroscience, 4, 323.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smolensky, P., & Legendre, G. (2011). The harmonic mind: From neural computation to optimality-theoretic grammar volume I: Cognitive architecture. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Vul, E., Harris, C., Winkielman, P., & Pashler, H (2009) Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspective on Psychological Science 4:274–290Google Scholar
  32. Zimmer, C. (2010). Sizing up consciousness by its bits. NY Times, Sept 20, 2010.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI)Stanford UniversityPalo AltoUSA
  2. 2.Nous Research, University College Dublin (UCD)DublinIreland
  3. 3.Ardrex ResearchLondonUK

Personalised recommendations