Advertisement

Biosemiotics

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 257–261 | Cite as

Introduction to the Special Issue Semiotics of Perception Being in the World of the Living—Semiotic Perspectives

  • Kati LindströmEmail author
  • Morten Tønnessen
Original Paper

Abstract

This special issue on the semiotics of perception originates from two workshops arranged in Tartu, Estonia, in February 2009. We are located at the junction of nature and culture, and of semiotics and phenomenology. Can they be reconciled? More particularly, can subfields such as biosemiotics and ecophenomenology be mutually enriching? The authors of the current special issue believe that they can. Semiotic study of life and the living can emerge as properly informed only if it is capable of incorporating observations made in natural science, philosophy and cultural studies. The semiotic study of nature entails an experiential turn in the study of life processes. Perception is—or should be—at the heart of the life sciences.

Keywords

Animal mind Landscape Perception Semiotics and phenomenology Uexküllian phenomenology Umwelt 

References

  1. Abram, D. (1997). The spell of the sensuous: Perception and language in a more-than-human world. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  2. Deely, J. (2001). Four ages of understanding. Toronto studies in semiotics and communication. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  3. Hoffmeyer, J. (2004). Uexküllian Planmässigkeit. Sign Systems Studies 31(1/2), 73–97.Google Scholar
  4. von Uexküll, J. (1909). Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. Berlin: Verlag von Julius Springer.Google Scholar
  5. von Uexküll, J. (1921). Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere (2nd ed.). Berlin: Verlag von Julius Springer.Google Scholar
  6. von Uexküll, J. (1956 [1934/1940]). Streifzüge durch die Umwelten von Tieren und Menschen: Ein Bilderbuch unsichtbarer Welten. Bedeutungslehre. Hamburg: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
  7. von Uexküll, J. (1982). The Theory of Meaning. Translation of ‘Bedeutungslehre’ (von Uexküll 1956 [1940]). Semiotica 42.1, 25–80.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Semiotics, Institute of Philosophy and SemioticsUniversity of TartuTartuEstonia

Personalised recommendations