Biosemiotics

, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp 329–345 | Cite as

Social is Emotional

Article

Abstract

This is a biological approach to the philosophy of mind that feeds an investigation of the phenomena of “social” and “emotional”, both of which are widespread in nature. I scrutinize the non-dualistic Darwinian concept of the continuity of mind. For practical reasons, I address mind at different levels of organization: The systemic mind are the properties of which a common, coherent evolution works upon. Separated from this is “language-mind”: the crystallization of thought in words, which is a strictly human phenomenon. As the phenomenology of the body is a theory of philosophy that lie beyond language it can—to a certain extent—be extrapolated across a species boundary. In the process the phenomenology of the body comes to resemble biosemiotics and with this tool, I investigate a field study of social play behavior in canids. This leads to a possibility to study the non-human experience of emotion as “locally meaningful phenomena”.

Keywords

Social play behavior Biosemiotics Ethology The evolution and distribution of mind and feeling 

References

  1. Allen, C., & Bekoff, M. (1999). Species of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  2. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  3. Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature. A necessary unity. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  4. Bekoff, M. (1995). Play signals as punctuation: the structure of social play in canids. Behaviour, 132, 419–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bekoff, M. EETA-list. March 13, 2004.Google Scholar
  6. Bekoff, M., & Byers, J. A. (Eds.) (1998). Animal Play. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
  7. Bekoff, M., & Jamieson, D. (1999). Readings in animal cognition (2nd ed.). Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  8. Burghardt, G. (1998). The evolutionary origins of play revisited: lessons from turtles. In M. Bekoff, & J. Byers (Eds.), Animal play (pp. 1–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Burghardt, G. (1999). Conceptions of play and the evolution of animal minds. Evolution and Cognition, 5(2), 114–122.Google Scholar
  10. Boomsma, J. J., Hölldobler, B., Jones, G., Loosli, R., Ratnieks, F. L. W., Seppä, P., & Turillazzi, S. (1998). Social evolution: An integrated study of the effects of kinship, communication, productivity and disease. Proceedings of the EU-TMR Congress onResearch Training Networks-Past, Present and Future”, Graz, Austria, May 1998, pp. 73–76.Google Scholar
  11. Damasio, A. (1994). Descarteserror. Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam Books.Google Scholar
  12. Darwin, C. (1879/2004). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  13. Deacon, T. (1997). The symbolic species. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  14. Depew, D. L., & Weber, B. H. (1995). Darwinism evolving: Systems dynamics and the genealogy of natural selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  15. de Waal, F. (2001). The ape and the sushi master. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Drickamer, L., Vessey, S., & Meikle, D. (1996). Animal behavior. Mechanisms; ecology; evolution. USA: Wm. C. Brown Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Fagen, R. (1981). Animal play behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Feddersen-Pedersen, D. (1991). The ontogeny of social play and agonistic behaviour in selected canid species. Bonn Zoologische Beitrage, 42, 97–114.Google Scholar
  19. Hoffmeyer, J. (1996). Signs of meaning in the universe. The natural history of signification. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hoffmeyer, J. (1998). Biosemiotics. In P. Bouissac (Ed.), Encyclopedia of semiotics (pp. 82–84). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hoffmeyer, J. (2005). From thing to relation. On Bateson’s bioanthropology.Google Scholar
  22. Hoffmeyer, J., & Kull, K. (2003). Baldwin and biosemiotics: What intelligence is for. In B. Weber & D. J. Depew (Eds.), Evolution and learning (pp. 253–272). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kringelbach, M. L. (2005). Emotion. In R. L. Gregory (Ed.), The Oxford companion to the mind (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kringelbach, M., & Rolls, E. (2004). The functional neuroanatomy of the human orbitofrontal cortex: evidence from neuroimaging and neuropsycology. Progress in Neurobiology, in press.Google Scholar
  25. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Kroppens Fænomenologi. 3 oplag Danmark: Det lille Forlag.Google Scholar
  26. Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 83, 435–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nagel, T. (1986). The view from nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Peirce, C. S. (1996). Kosmologi og Metafysik. Danmark: Samlerens Bogklub.Google Scholar
  29. Sebeok, T. A., & Umiker-Sebeok, J. (1980). Speaking of apes: A critical anthology of two-way communication with man. New York: Plenum Books.Google Scholar
  30. von Uexküll, J. (1957). A stroll through the worlds of animals and men: a picturebook of invisible worlds. Semiotica, 89(4), 319–191Google Scholar
  31. Uexküll, T., Geigges, W., & Herrmann, J. (1993). Endosemiosis. Semiotica, 96(1/2), 5–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Learning Lab DenmarkUniversity of AarhusAarhusDenmark
  2. 2.Institute of Molecular BiologyUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  3. 3.Biosemiotic Group CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations