Biosemiotics

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 169–190 | Cite as

The Semiotic Body

Article

Abstract

Most bodies in this world do not have brains and the minority of animal species that do have brained bodies are descendents from species with more distributed or decentralized nervous systems. Thus, bodies were here first, and only relatively late in evolution did the bodies of a few species grow supplementary organs, brains, sophisticated enough to support a psychological life. Psychological life therefore from the beginning was embedded in and served as a tool for corporeal life. This paper discusses the semiotically controlled dynamics of bodily existence that has allowed the evolution of these seemingly ‘unnatural’ mental and even linguistic kinds of species. It is shown how the skin, on the one hand, makes us belong in the world, and on the other hand, is part of the huge landscape of membranes across which the semiotic self incessantly must be reconstituted. The discussion moves on to the intracellular world of signal transduction through which the activity of single cells are put to service for bodily needs. The paper further considers the mechanisms behind homeostasis and the semiotics of the psycho-neuro-endocrine integration in the body. The concept of semiotic emergence is introduced and a holistic marker hypothesis for why some animals may have an experiential life is suggested.

Keywords

Body Self Experiential life Semiotic causation Semiotic emergence Holistic marker 

References

  1. Ader, R., & Cohen, N. (1975). Behaviorally conditioned immunosuppression. Psychosomatic Medicine, 37, 333–340.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ader, R., & Cohen, N. (1993). Psychoneuroimmunology: Conditioning and stress. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 53–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, M., Deely, J., et al. (1984). A semiotic perspective on the sciences: Steps toward a new paradigm. Semiotica, 52, 7–47.Google Scholar
  4. Barbieri, M. (2003). The organic codes. An introduction to semantic biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barrit, G. J. (1996). Communication within animal cells. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bickhardt, M. H., & Campbell, D. T. (1999). Emergence. In P. B. Andersen, C. Emmeche, N. O. Finnemann, & P. V. Christiansen (Eds.), Emergence (pp. 322–348). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bruni, L. E. (2002). Does ‘quorum sensing’ imply a new type of biological information. Sign Systems Studies, 30(1), 221–243.Google Scholar
  8. Bruni, L. E. (2007). Cellular semiotics and signal transduction. In M. Barbieri (Ed.), Introduction to bioisemiotics (pp. 365–407). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Chalmers, D. (1996). The conscious mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error. emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam Books.Google Scholar
  11. Darwin, C. (1981 [1871]). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dewey, J. (1948). Reconstruction in philosophy. Enlarged edition with a new forty page introduction by the author. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  13. Fyrand, O. (1997). Det gådefulde sprog. Om hudens kommunikation. København: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
  14. Gordon, D. (1999). Ants at work. How an insect society is organized. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gordon, D. M. (1995). The development of organization in an ant colony. American Scientist, 83, 50–57.Google Scholar
  16. Haken, H. (1984). The science of structure: Synergetics. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  17. Hamburger, J. (1988). The heritage of experimental embryology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hoffmeyer, J. (1996). Signs of meaning in the universe. Bloomington: IN, Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hoffmeyer, J. (2008). Biosemiotics. An examination into the signs of life and the life of signs. In John Deely (Ed.), Approaches to postmodernity 2. Scranton: Scranton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Jonas, H. (2001 [1966]). The phenomenon of life. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  21. Juarrero, A. (1999). Dynamics in action. Intentional behavior as a complex system. Cambridge Massachusetts: Bradford Book.Google Scholar
  22. Kauffman, S. A. (1993). Origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns. The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Book.Google Scholar
  24. Kemp, P., Lebech, M., et al. (1997). Den Bioetiske Vending. En Grundbog i Bioetik. København: Spektrum.Google Scholar
  25. Kierkegaard, S. (1944). The sickness unto death. London: Oxford University Press (first published in 1849, in Danish).Google Scholar
  26. McFall-Ngai, J., & Ruby, E. G. (1998). Sepiolids and vibrios: When first they meet. BioScience, 48(4), 257–265.Google Scholar
  27. LeDoux, J. (1996). The emotional brain. The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  28. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002 [1945]). Phenomenology of perception (Colin Smith trans). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Monod, J. (1970). Le Hazard at la Nécessité. Essai sur la Philosophie Naturelle de la Biologie Moderne. Paris, Seuil.Google Scholar
  30. Monod, J. (1971). Chance and Necessity: An Essay on the Natural Philosophy of Modern Biology. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  31. Olmstead, J. M. D. (1938). Claude Bernard, physiologist. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
  32. Port, R., & Van Gelder, T. (Eds.) (1995). Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.Google Scholar
  33. Rocha, L. (2001). Evolution with material symbol systems. In L. M. Rocha (Ed.), The physics and evolution of symbols and codes: Reflections on the work of Howard Pattee. Special issue of BioSystems 60 (1/3):95–121.Google Scholar
  34. Santaella-Braga, L. (1999). A new causality for the understanding of the living. Biosemiotics. Semiotica, 127(1/4), 497–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sheets-Johnstone, M. (1998). Consciousness: A natural history. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 5(3), 260–294.Google Scholar
  36. Stjernfelt, F. (1999). Formal ontology. Semiotica, 127(1/4), 537–566.Google Scholar
  37. Von Uexküll, T. (1999). The relationship between semiotics and mechanical models. Of explanation in the life sciences. Semiotica, 127(1/4), 647–655.Google Scholar
  38. Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology. The new synthesis. Cambridge: Belknap.Google Scholar
  39. Yarbus, A. L. (1967). Eye movements and vision. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  40. Yates, E. F. (1998). Biosphere as semiosphere. Semiotica, 120(3/4), 439–453.Google Scholar
  41. Zahavi, D. (1999). Self-awareness and alterity. A phenomenological investigation. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Copenhagen Biocenter, Department of Molecular BiologyUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen NDenmark

Personalised recommendations