Geosciences Journal

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 183–190 | Cite as

Seismic noise level variation in South Korea

  • Dong-Hoon SheenEmail author
  • Jin Soo Shin
  • Tae-Seob Kang


Variations of seismic background noise in South Korea have been investigated using power spectral analysis. We have estimated the power spectral density of seismic noise for 30 broadband stations from 2005 to 2007. In the frequency range 1–5 Hz, diurnal variations of noise level and daily differences in daytime noise level are observed at most stations, suggesting that cultural activities contribute to the noise level of a station. The variation in the number of stations detecting an event, however, suggests that cultural noise has little influence on the detection capability of events over magnitude 2.0. In the frequency range 0.1–0.5 Hz, a double-frequency (DF) peak is dominant at all stations. Clear seasonal variations of peaks are observed, while much less shown in the frequency range 1–5 Hz. DF noise levels are higher in winter than in summer. Strong DF peaks occur in summer when Pacific typhoons near the Korean Peninsula. The discrepancy in time between DF peaks at seismic stations and peaks of significant wave height at buoys, as well as the decrease of DF peaks with increased latitude, indicate that the likely source region of DF peaks is located in the Southern Sea of Korea.

Key words

seismic background noise diurnal variation seasonal variation double frequency microseism 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aster, R. C. and Shearer, P. M., 1991, High-frequency borehole seismograms recorded in the San Jacinto fault zone, southern California. part 2. attenuation and site effects. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 81, 1081–1100.Google Scholar
  2. Barstow, N., Sutton, G. H. and Carter, J. A., 1989, Particle motion and pressure relationships of ocean bottom noise: 3900 m depth; 0.003 to 5 Hz. Geophysical Research Letters, 16, 1185–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bromirski, P. D., Duennebier, F. K. and Stephen, R. A., 2005, Midocean microseisms. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 6, Q04009, doi:10.1029/2004GC000768.Google Scholar
  4. Carter, J. A., Barstow, N., Pomeroy, P. W., Chael, E. P. and Leahy, P. J., 1991, High frequency seismic noise as a function of depth. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 81, 1101–1114.Google Scholar
  5. Chevrot, S., Sylvander, M., Benahmed, S., Ponsolles, C., Lefevre, J. M. and Paradis, D., 2007, Source locations of secondary microseisms in Western Europe: Evidence for both coastal and pelagic source. Journal of Geophysical Research, 112, B11301, doi:10.1029/2007JB005059.Google Scholar
  6. Friedrich, A., Kruger, F. and Klinge, K., 1998, Ocean-generated microseismic noise located with the Grafenberg array. Journal of Seismology, 2, 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gordeev, E. I., 1990, Generation of microseisms in the coastal area. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 63, 201–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hasselmann, K., 1963, A statistical analysis of the generation of microseisms. Review of Geophysics, 1, 177–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haubrich, R. A. and McCamy, K., 1969, Microseisms: Coastal and pelagic sources. Review of Geophysics, 7, 539–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kedar, S., Longuet-Higgins, M., Webb, F., Graham, N., Clayton, R. and Jones, C., 2008, The origin of deep ocean microseisms in the North Atlantic Ocean. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 464, 777–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Longuet-Higgins, M. S., 1950, A theory of the origin of microseisms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, Series A, 243, 1–35.Google Scholar
  12. Marzorati, S. and Bindi, D., 2006, Ambient noise levels in north central Italy. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 7, Q09010, doi: 10.1029/2006GC001256.Google Scholar
  13. McNamara, D. E. and Buland, R. P., 2004, Ambient noise levels in the continental United States. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 94, 1517–1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Peterson, J., 1993, Observations and modeling of background seismic noise. U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report, 93-322, pages 1–95.Google Scholar
  15. Rhie, J. and Romanowicz, B., 2004, Excitation of Earth’s continuous free oscillations by atmosphere-ocean-seafloor coupling. Nature, 431, 552–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rind, D. and Donn, W. L., 1979, Microseisms at Palisades, 2. Rayleigh wave and Love wave characteristics and the geologic control of propagation. Journal of Geophysical Research, 84, 5632–5642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ringdal, F. and Bungum, H., 1977, Noise level variation at NORSAR and its effect on detectability. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 67, 479–492.Google Scholar
  18. Schulte-Pelkum, V., Earle, P. S. and Vernon, F. L., 2004, Strong directivity of ocean-generated seismic noise. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 5, Q03004, doi:10.1029/2003GC000520.Google Scholar
  19. Withers, M. M., Aster, R. C., Young, C. J. and Chael, E. P., 1996, High-frequency analysis of seismic background noise as a function of wind speed and shallow depth. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 86, 1507–1515.Google Scholar
  20. Young, C. J., Chael, E. P., Withers, M. M. and Aster, R. C., 1996, A comparison of the high-frequency (>1 hz) surface and subsurface noise environment at three sites in the United States. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 86, 1516–1528.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Korean Geoscience Societies 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Earthquake Research Center, Geological Research DivisionKorea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral ResourcesDaejeonKorea
  2. 2.Department of Environmental GeosciencesPukyong National UniversityBusanKorea

Personalised recommendations