Advertisement

Nutrient enhancement of chickpea grown with plant growth promoting bacteria in local soil of Bathinda, Northwestern India

  • Nitin Dogra
  • Radheshyam Yadav
  • Manpreet Kaur
  • Arindam Adhikary
  • Sanjeev Kumar
  • Wusirika RamakrishnaEmail author
Research Article
  • 58 Downloads

Abstract

Plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) enhance crop productivity as part of green technology to reduce the use of chemical fertilizers. They also have the capability to enhance macro- and micronutrient content of plants. In the present study, PGPB isolates belonging to Pseudomonas citronellis (PC), Pseudomonas sp. RA6, Serratia sp. S2, Serratia marcescens CDP13, and Frateuria aurantia (Symbion-K) were tested on two chickpea varieties, PBG1 and PBG5 grown for 30 days in local soil from Bathinda region in Northwestern India. PC and CDP13 were found to be better chickpea growth stimulators compared to the commercial Symbion-K based on shoot length and biomass. Most PGPB enhanced macro- and micronutrients in shoots to varying degrees compared to the control. PBG5 gave better response compared to PBG1 with reference to plant growth attributes and enhancement of the macronutrients, calcium, nitrogen and phosphorus and micronutrients, boron, copper, iron, and zinc. PBG5 is a high yielding variety with better resistance compared to PBG1. Overall, PGPB isolated from the local soil and PGPB from other parts of India were shown to be useful for enhancement of nutrient content and plant growth.

Keywords

Bomass Chickpea Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry Nutrient Content Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria Biofertilizer Macronutrient Micronutrient Pseudomonas 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge research funding for this project by the Central University of Punjab to Wusirika Ramakrishna and Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-University Grants Commission (UGC) junior research fellowships to Radheshyam Yadav and Arindam Adhikary. We thank Ravishankar Kumar and Dr. Sunil Mittal for help with nitrogen and phosphorus estimation.

Supplementary material

12298_2019_661_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.2 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1240 kb)

References

  1. Adhikary A, Saini R, Bhardwaj P, Kumar S (2019) Pseudomonas: a major bacteria in heavy metal contaminated soil of South-West Punjab. Intl J Plant Environ (in press) Google Scholar
  2. Arora NK, Khare E, Oh JH, Kang SC, Maheshwari DK (2008) Diverse mechanisms adopted by fluorescent Pseudomonas PGC2 during the inhibition of Rhizoctonia solani and Phytophthora capsici. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 24:581–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bashan Y, Hernandez J-P, Leyva LA, Bacilio M (2002) Alginate microbeads as inoculant carriers for plant growth-promoting bacteria. Biol Fertility Soils 35:359–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker JS, Sela H, Dobrowolska J, Zoriy M, Becker JS (2008) Recent applications on isotope ratio measurements by ICP-MS and LA-ICP-MS on biological samples and single particles. Intl J Mass Spectrom 270:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butterbach-Bahl K, Baggs EM, Dannenmann M, Kiese R, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S (2013) Nitrous oxide emissions from soils: how well do we understand the processes and their controls? Phil Trans R Soc B 368:20130122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Connorton JM, Balk J, Rodríguez-Celma J (2017) Iron homeostasis in plants—a brief overview. Metallomics 9:813–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dhawi F, Datta R, Ramakrishna W (2015) Mycorrhiza and PGPB modulate maize biomass, nutrient uptake and metabolic pathways in maize grown in mining-impacted soil. Plant Physiol Biochem 97:390–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dhawi F, Datta R, Ramakrishna W (2016) Mycorrhiza and heavy metal resistant bacteria enhance growth, nutrient uptake and alter metabolic profile of sorghum grown in marginal soil. Chemosphere 157:33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dhawi F, Datta R, Ramakrishna W (2017) Proteomics provides insights into biological pathways altered by plant growth promoting bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhiza in sorghum grown in marginal soil. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA)—Proteins Proteom 1865:243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dhawi F, Datta R, Ramakrishna W (2018) Metabolomics, biomass and lignocellulosic total sugars analysis in foxtail millet (Setaria italica) inoculated with different combinations of plant growth promoting bacteria and mycorrhiza. Commun Plant Sci 8:2018002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fabiano CC, Tezotto T, Favarin JL, Polacco JC, Mazzafera P (2015) Essentiality of nickel in plants: a role in plant stresses. Front Plant Sci 6:754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Flores-Félix JD, Silva LR, Rivera LP, Marcos-García M, García-Fraile P, Martínez-Molina E et al (2015) Plants probiotics as a tool to produce highly functional fruits: the case of phyllobacterium and vitamin C in strawberries. PLoS ONE 10:e0122281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garcia‐Casal MN, Peña‐Rosas JP, Pachón H, De‐Regil LM, Tablante EC, Flores‐Urrutia MC (2016) Staple crops biofortified with increased micronutrient content: effects on vitamin and mineral status, as well as health and cognitive function in the general population. Cochrane Libr 8:CD012311Google Scholar
  14. Gaur PM, Tripathi S, Gowda CLL, Ranga Rao GV, Sharma HC, Pande S, Sharma M (2010) Chickpea seed production manual. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, p 28Google Scholar
  15. Glick BR (1995) The enhancement of plant growth by free-living bacteria. Canadian J Microbiol 41:109–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gordon SA, Weber RP (1951) Colorimetric estimation of indoleacetic acid. Plant Physiol 26:192–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hafeez B, Khanif YM, Saleem M (2013) Role of zinc in plant nutrition—a review. Am J Exper Agric 3:374–391Google Scholar
  18. Hepler PK (2005) Calcium: a central regulator of plant growth and development. Plant Cell 17:2142–2155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. IS 5194 (1969) Method for determination of nitrogen-Kjeldahl method, [CHD 1: Inorganic Chemicals]. Bureau of Indian Standards, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  20. Jackson ML (ed) (1973) Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  21. Krachler M, Mohl C, Emons H, Shotyk W (2002) Influence of digestion procedures on the determination of rare earth elements in peat and plant samples by USN-ICP-MS. J Anal At Spectrom 17:844–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Laditi MA, Nwoke OC, Jemo M, Abaidoo RC, Ogunjobi AA (2012) Evaluation of microbial inoculants as biofertilizers for the improvement of growth and yield of soybean and maize crops in savanna soils. Afr J Agric Res 7:405–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leghari SJ, Wahocho NA, Laghari GM, Laghari AH, Bhabhan GM, Talpur KH, Bhutto TA, Wahocho SA, Lashari AA (2016) Role of nitrogen for plant growth and development: a review. Adv Environ Biol 10:209–218Google Scholar
  24. Li K, Ramakrishna W (2011) Effect of multiple metal resistant bacteria from contaminated lake sediments on metal accumulation and plant growth. J Haz Mater 189:531–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li K, Pidatala VR, Shaik R, Datta R, Ramakrishna W (2014) Integrated metabolomic and proteomic approaches dissect the effect of metal-resistant bacteria on maize biomass and copper uptake. Environ Sci Technol 48:1184–1193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maathuis FJ (2009) Physiological functions of mineral macronutrients. Curr Opin Plant Biol 12:250–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maathuis FJM (2014) Sodium in plants: perception, signalling, and regulation of sodium fluxes. J Exp Bot 65:849–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mantelin S, Touraine B (2004) Plant growth-promoting bacteria and nitrate availability: impacts on root development and nitrate uptake. J Exp Bot 55:27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marrugo-Negrete J, Pinedo-Hernández J, Díez S (2017) Assessment of heavy metal pollution, spatial distribution and origin in agricultural soils along the Sinú River Basin, Colombia. Environ Res 154:380–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Minz A, Sinha AK, Kumar R, Kumar B, Deep KP, Kumar SB (2018) A review on importance of cobalt in crop growth and production. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 7:2978–2984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Młodzińska E, Zboińska M (2016) Phosphate uptake and allocation—a closer look at Arabidopsis thaliana L. and Oryza sativa L. Front Plant Sci. 7:1198Google Scholar
  32. Mustafiz A, Ghosh A, Tripathi AK, Kaur C, Ganguly AK, Bhavesh NS, Tripathi JK, Pareek A, Sopory SK, Singla-Pareek SL (2014) A unique Ni2+ -dependent and methylglyoxal-inducible rice glyoxalase I possesses a single active site and functions in abiotic stress response. Plant J 78:951–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Navarro-Torre S, Mateos-Naranjo E, Caviedes M, Pajuelo E, Rodríguez-Llorente I (2016) Isolation of plant-growth-promoting and metal-resistant cultivable bacteria from Arthrocnemum macrostachyum in the Odiel marshes with potential use in phytoremediation. Mar Pollut Bull 110:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Prasanna R, Nain L, Rana A, Shivay YS (2016) Biofortification with microorganisms: present status and future challenges. Biofortification of Food Crops. Springer, New Delhi, pp 249–262Google Scholar
  35. Premachandra D, Hudek L, Brau L (2016) Bacterial modes of action for enhancing of plant growth. J Biotechnol Biomater 6:1–8Google Scholar
  36. Singh RP, Jha PN (2016) The multifarious PGPR Serratia marcescens CDP-13 augments induced systemic resistance and enhanced salinity tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). PLos One 11:e0155026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Singh S, Bains I, Sharma TS, Sidhu R, Singh S (2004) PBG 5: a new multiple disease resistant desi chickpea variety for Punjab, India. Intl Chickpea Pigeonpea Newslett 11:18–20Google Scholar
  38. Singh R, Pathak B, Fulekar MH (2015) Characterization of PGP traits by heavy metals tolerant Pseudomonas putida and Bacillus safensis strain isolated from rhizospheric zone of weed (Phyllanthus urinaria) and its efficiency in Cd and Pb removal. Intl J Curr Microbiol App Sci 4:954–975Google Scholar
  39. Singh D, Geat N, Rajawat MVS, Mahajan MM, Prasanna R, Singh S, Kaushik R, Singh RN, Kumar K, Saxena AK (2018) Deciphering the mechanisms of endophyte-mediated biofortification of Fe and Zn in wheat. J Plant Growth Regul 37:174–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tan GZH, Das Bhowmik SS, Hoang TML, Karbaschi MR, Johnson AAT, Williams B, Mundree SG (2017) Finger on the pulse: pumping iron into chickpea. Front Plant Sci 8:1755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tarafdar A, Raliya R, Wang W-N, Biswas P, Tarafdar J (2013) Green synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticle using Aspergillus tubingensis. Adv Sci Eng Med 5:943–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vejan P, Abdullah R, Khadiran T, Ismail S, Nasrulhaq Boyce A (2016) Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in agricultural sustainability—a review. Molecules 21:573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wimmer MA, Eichert T (2013) Review: mechanisms for boron deficiency-mediated changes in plant water relations. Plant Sci 203–204:25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yadav J, Verma JP, Jaiswal DK, Kumar A (2014) Evaluation of PGPR and different concentration of phosphorus level on plant growth, yield and nutrient content of rice (Oryza sativa). Ecological Engg 62:123–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yruela I (2005) Copper in plants. Braz J Plant Physiol 17:145–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Prof. H.S. Srivastava Foundation for Science and Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biochemistry and Microbial SciencesCentral University of PunjabBathindaIndia
  2. 2.Department of Plant SciencesCentral University of PunjabBathindaIndia

Personalised recommendations