Genetic characterization of Portuguese allochthonous populations of Pinus nigra using ISSRs and SCoTs and extrapolation of their infraspecific taxonomy
The Pinus nigra distribution in Portugal is restricted to six allochthonous populations with unknown origin and infraspecific taxonomy. This work intends to evaluate their genetic diversity, structure and relationships, and to infer about their infraspecific taxonomy by comparing molecular patterns produced by inter-simple sequence repeat and Start Codon Targeted markers among Portuguese and foreign samples with known taxonomy and provenance. 127 Portuguese P. nigra individuals were clustered per population. The genetic differentiation was higher within rather than among populations. The pooled molecular data indicated high genetic proximity among the Portuguese and foreign samples of subspecies laricio. However, the separate analysis per marker system demonstrated that two varieties of subspecies laricio (corsicana and calabrica) may have been used in the plantations of the Portuguese P. nigra stands performed in the last century. The genetic characterization and extrapolation of the intraspecific taxonomy of these populations provide useful information for forest management, afforestation and germplasm use.
KeywordsEuropean black pine Genetic structure Infraspecific taxa Molecular markers
The authors acknowledge to Prof. Bruno Fady (INRA, Avignon, France) and Dr. Marc Calvignac (Vilmorin S.A., La Ménitré, France) that kindly provided dehydrated needles and certified seeds, respectively, representative of different Pinus nigra taxa.
This study was funded by “Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia” (FCT) (grant SFRH/BD/91781/2012 co-financed by “Fundo Social Europeu” under the POPH-QREN program and projects UID/AGR/04033/2019 (to CITAB/UTAD), UID/MULTI/04046/2019 (to BioISI), and POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006958 - FEDER/COMPETE/POCI – Operational Competitiveness and Internationalization Program (to CITAB/UTAD).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- Akkemik Ü, Yılmaz H, Oral D et al (2010) Some changes in taxonomy of pines (Pinus L.) native to Turkey. J Fac For Istanbul U 61(1):63–78Google Scholar
- Barbéro M, Loisel R, Quézel P et al (1998) Pines of the Mediterranean basin. In: Richardson DM (ed) Ecology and biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 527 ppGoogle Scholar
- Candel Pérez D (2014) Pinus nigra Arn. ssp. salzmannii forest management in the context of climate change: ecological and genetic factors. Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, AlbaceteGoogle Scholar
- Christensen K (1997) Pinaceae, Cupressaceae, Taxaceae, Ephedraceae, Salicaceae, Juglandaceae, Betulaceae, Fagaceae, Ulmaceae Moraceae. In: Strid A, Tan K (eds) Flora Hellenica. Koeltz Scientific Books, KönigsteinGoogle Scholar
- Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15Google Scholar
- Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131(2):479–491Google Scholar
- Farjon A (1998) World checklist and bibliography of conifers. Royal Botanic Gardens, KewGoogle Scholar
- Gaussen H, Heywood VH, Chater AO (1964) The genus Pinus L. In: Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burgers NA, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA (eds) Flora Europaea, vol 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 32–35Google Scholar
- Hedges SB (1992) The number of replications needed for accurate estimation of the bootstrap p value in phylogenetic studies. Mol Biol Evol 9:366–369Google Scholar
- Little E, Critchfield W (1969) Subdivisions of the genus Pinus (Pines). U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Services, Miscellaneous Publications, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Louro V (1982) O pinheiro larício: Pinus nigra Arnold em Portugal. Direcção Geral do Ordenamento e Gestao Florestal, LisboaGoogle Scholar
- Lucas Borja ME, Candel Pérez D, Molero Carrasco J et al (2013) Utilización de los marcadores ISSR para la determinación de diversidad genética en poblaciones de Pinus nigra Arn.. 6º Congreso Forestal Español, 10-14 junio 2013, Vitoria-Gasteiz, pp 1–10. ISBN: 978-84-937964-9-5Google Scholar
- Price RA, Liston A, Strauss SH (1998) Phylogeny and systematics of Pinus. In: Richardson DM (ed) Ecology and biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge University Press, London, pp 49–68Google Scholar
- Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959Google Scholar
- Reis E (1997) Estatística multivariada aplicada. Edições Sílabo, Lda., LisboaGoogle Scholar
- Rohlf FJ (1998) NTSYS-pc ver. 2.02. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Exeter Publishing, SetauketGoogle Scholar
- Scaltsoyiannes A, Rohr R, Panetsos KP, Tsaktsira M (1994) Allozyme frequency distributions in 5 European populations of black pine (Pinus nigra Arnold). 1. Estimation of genetic variation within and among populations. 2. Contribution of isozyme analysis to the taxonomic status of the species. Silvae Genet 43:20–30Google Scholar
- Yap I, Nelson R (1996) Winboot: a program for performing bootstrap analysis of binary data to determine the confidence limits of UPGMA-based dendrograms. International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), ManilaGoogle Scholar
- Yeh FC, Yang RC, Boyle TB et al (1999) POPGENE version 1.32, the user-friendly shareware for population genetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Centre, University of Alberta, EdmontonGoogle Scholar