Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 327–337 | Cite as

Employing barcoding markers to authenticate selected endangered medicinal plants traded in Indian markets

  • Saloni Malik
  • Akanksha Priya
  • Shashi B. BabbarEmail author
Research Article


The high demand of medicinal plants and their unrestricted collection have rendered many of these as rare or endangered. The restrictions imposed on their collection and trade are difficult to implement because of the inability to identify them in fragmented form. The rarity of these plants in nature and lack of their cultivation raise doubt about the authenticity of the herbals sold in markets. Therefore, in the present investigation, ITS/ITS2, matK, rbcL and rpoC1 sequences of fourteen species of important medicinal plants, some of which are endangered, were generated and checked for their species-specificity (sequences having maximum similarity only with their own) by BLAST1 and/or BOLD identifications. ITS sequences of 12 species were species-specific. However, ITS2 of only 10 of these 12 species were species-specific. As for the chloroplast loci, rbcL and rpoC1 sequences of all 14 species could be obtained, while matK sequences of only 10 of these could be generated. Of the retrieved sequences, rbcL, rpoC1 and matK sequences of 7, 11 and 7 species, respectively, were species-specific. The sequences of the targeted loci from the herbal samples of these species were difficult to retrieve because of failure in the amplification or sequencing. Nevertheless, based on ITS2 and/or one or more of the chloroplast loci targeted, the botanical identities of 22 herbal market samples were checked by phylogenetic tree, BLAST1 and BOLD identification methods. Of these 22 samples, only one of each of Rauvolfia serpentina and Picrorhiza kurroa were found to be authentic.


DNA barcoding Herbals ITS matK Medicinal plants 



The research work was financially supported by the grants provided to SBB by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi and DST-Purse and Research and Development Grants, University of Delhi. The awards of Junior and Senior Research Fellowships to SM and AP by ICMR and University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi, respectively, are gratefully acknowledged.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

12298_2018_610_MOESM1_ESM.docx (37 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 36 kb)
12298_2018_610_MOESM2_ESM.xls (29 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (XLS 29 kb)
12298_2018_610_MOESM3_ESM.xls (28 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (XLS 28 kb)
12298_2018_610_MOESM4_ESM.xls (32 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (XLS 31 kb)
12298_2018_610_MOESM5_ESM.xls (34 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (XLS 34 kb)


  1. Barnwell P, Blanchard AN, Bryant JA, Smirnoff N, Weir A (1998) Isolation of DNA from the highly mucilaginous succulent plant Sedum telephium. Plant Mol Biol Rep 16:133–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell JR (2008) A simple way to treat PCR products prior to sequencing using ExoSAP-IT®. Biotechniques 44:834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chase MW, Salamin N, Wilkinson M, Dunwell JM, Kesanakurthi RP, Haider N et al (2005) Land plants and DNA barcodes: short-term and long-term goals. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Biol Sci 360:1889–1895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chase MW, Cowan RS, Hollingsworth PM, Van den Berg C, Madrinan S, Petersen G et al (2007) A proposal for a standardized protocol to barcode all land plants. Taxon 56:295–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chase MW, Salamin N, Wilkinson M, Dunwell JM, Kesanakurthi RP, Haider N et al (2016) Correction to ‘Land plants and DNA barcodes: short-term and long-term goals’. Philos Trans R Soc B 371:20150063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen S, Yao H, Han J, Liu C, Song J, Shi L et al (2010) Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant species. PLoS One 5:e8613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. China Plant BOL Group (2011) Comparative analysis of a large dataset indicates that internal transcribed spacer (ITS) should be incorporated into the core barcode for seed plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:19641–19646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dawa S, Hussain A, Tamchos T (2013) Medicinal and aromatic plants as a viable livelihood option for the people of Jammu and Kashmir. Indian Hortic J 3:40–42Google Scholar
  9. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15Google Scholar
  10. Fay MF, Swensen SM, Chase MW (1997) Taxonomic affinities of Medusagyne oppositifolia (Medusagynaceae). Kew Bull 52:111–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ford CS, Ayres KL, Toomey N, Haider N, Stahl JVA, Kelly LJ, Wikstrom N, Hollingsworth PM, Duff RJ, Hoot SB, Cowan RS, Chase MW, Wilkinson MJ (2009) Selection of candidate coding DNA barcoding regions for use on land plants. Bot J Linn Soc 159:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Girach RD, Aminuddin, Khan SA (1994) Andrographis paniculata—a possible substitute for Swertia chirata in Southeastern India. Int J Pharmacog 32:95–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Giri CM (2013) Concept of Abhava Pratinidhi Dravyas, a rational substitution of drugs- a review. Int J Adv Ayush 2:148–161Google Scholar
  14. Haider N (2011) Identification of plant species using traditional and molecular-based methods. In: Davis RE (ed) Wild plants: identification, uses and conservation). Nova Science Publ, Inc., New York, pp 1–62Google Scholar
  15. Haider N (2015) The use of DNA based methods for detection of plant based adulterants in plant food products. In: Haynes A (ed) Advances in food analysis research. Nova Science Publishers, Inc. ISBN: 978-1-63483-795-8Google Scholar
  16. Haider N, Wilkinson NMJ (2011) A set of plastid DNA-specific universal primers for flowering plants. Russ J Genet 47:1204–1215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hall TA (1999) Bioedit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp 41:95–98Google Scholar
  18. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, de Waard JR (2003a) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci 270:313–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hebert PDN, Ratnasingham S, de Waard JR (2003b) Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc Biol Sci 270:S96–S99Google Scholar
  20. Hebert PDN, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM (2004) Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biol 2:e312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hollingsworth PM, Forrest LL, Spouge JL, Hajibabaei M, Ratnasingham S, Chase MW et al (2009) CBOL Plant Working Group. A DNA barcode for land plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:12794–12797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hollingsworth PM, Graham SW, Little DP (2011) Choosing and using a plant DNA barcode. PLoS One 6:e19254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hussain S, Hore DK (2008) Collection and conservation of major medicinal plants of Arunachal Pradesh. Indian For 134:1663–1679Google Scholar
  24. Joshi P, Dhawan V (2005) Swertia chirayita—an overview. Curr Sci 89:635–640Google Scholar
  25. Joshi PR, Patel BR, Shukla VJ (2012) An overview of the causes of current practices in Pratinidhi Dravyas (substitution of drugs) in Ayurveda including newer techniques for their evaluation. Ayu 33:481–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keller A, Schleicher T, Schultz J, Muller T, Dandekar T, Wolf M (2009) 5.8S-28S rRNA interaction and HMM-based ITS2 annotation. Gene 430:50–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kool A, de Boer HJ, Kruger A, Rydberg A, Abbad A, Bjork L et al (2012) Molecular identification of commercialized medicinal plants in Southern Morocco. PLoS ONE 7:e39459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kress WJ, Erickson DL (2007) A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: the coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region. PLoS One 2:e508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kress WJ, Wurdack KJ, Zimmer EA, Weigt LA, Janzen DH (2005) Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:8369–8374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kumar JUS, Krishna V, Seethapathy GS, Senthilkumar U, Raghupathy S, Ganeshaiah KN et al (2015) DNA barcoding to assess species adulteration in raw drug trade of “Bala” (genus: Sida L.) herbal products in South India. Biochem Syst Ecol 61:501–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kumar JUS, Gogna N, Newmaster SG, Krishna V, Raghupathy S, Seethapathy GS et al (2016) DNA barcoding and NMR spectroscopy-based assessment of species adulteration in the raw herbal trade of Saraca asoca (Roxb.) Willd., an important medicinal plant. Int J Legal Med 130:1457–1470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kuzmina ML, Johnson KL, Barron HR, Hebert PDN (2012) Identification of the vascular plants of Churchill, Manitoba, using a DNA Barcode library. BMC Ecol 12:25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lahaye R, van der Bank M, Bogarin D, Warner J, Pupulin F, Gigot G et al (2008) DNA barcoding the floras of biodiversity hotspots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:2923–2928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mishra P, Kumar A, Nagireddy A, Mani DN, Shukla AK, Tiwari R, Sundaresan V (2015) DNA barcoding: an efficient tool to overcome authentication challenges in the herbal market. Plant Biotechnol J 14:8–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mishra P, Kumar A, Rodrigues V, Shukla AK, Sundaresan V (2016) Feasibility of nuclear ribosomal region ITS1 over ITS2 in barcoding taxonomically challenging genera of subtribe Cassiinae (Fabaceae). Peer J 4(4):e2638. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mishra P, Kumar A, Nagireddy A, Shukla AK, Sundaresan V (2017) Evaluation of single and multilocus DNA barcodes towards species delineation in complex tree genus Terminalia. PLoS One 12(8):e0182836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Newmaster SG, Grguric M, Shanmughanandhan D, Ramalingam S, Ragupathy S (2013) DNA barcoding detects contamination and substitution in North American herbal products. BMC Med 11:222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Olmstead RG, Michaels HJ, Scott KM, Palmer JD (1992) Monophyly of the Asteridae and identification of their major lineages inferred from DNA sequences of rbcL. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 79:249–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pang X, Song J, Zhu Y, Xie C, Chen S (2010) Using DNA barcoding to identify species within Euphorbiaceae. Planta Med 76:1784–1786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Parveen I, Singh HK, Raghuvanshi S, Pradhan UC, Babbar SB (2012) DNA barcoding of endangered Indian Paphiopedilum species. Mol Ecol Resour 12:82–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Parveen I, Gafner S, Techen N, Murch SJ, Abd Khan IA (2016) DNA barcoding for the identification of botanicals in herbal medicine and dietery supplements; strengths and limitations. Planta Med. Google Scholar
  42. Parveen I, Singh HK, Malik S, Raghuvanshi S, Babbar SB (2017) Evaluating five different loci (rbcL, rpoB, rpoC1, matK and ITS) for DNA barcoding of Indian orchids. Genome 60:665–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Raclariu AC, Heinrich M, Ichim MC, de Boer H (2018) Benefits and limitations of DNA barcoding and metabarcoding in herbal product authentication. Phytochem Anal 29:123–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ratnasingham S and Hebert PDN (2007) BOLD: The barcode of life data system ( Mol Ecol Notes 7: 355–364
  45. Ross HA, Murugan S, Li WL (2008) Testing the reliability of genetic methods of species identification via simulation. Syst Biol 57:216–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rubinoff D, Cameron S, Will K (2006) Are plant DNA barcodes a search for the Holy Grail? Trends Ecol Evol 21:1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR (1977) DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Pro Natl Acad Sci USA 74:5463–5467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sarwat M, Yamdagni MM (2014) DNA barcoding, microarrays and next generation sequencing: recent tools for genetic diversity estimation and authentication of medicinal plants. Crit Rev Biotech 36:191–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Saunders GW (2005) Applying DNA barcoding to red macroalgae: a preliminary appraisal holds promise for future applications. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360:1879–1888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Selvam ABD (2012) Pharmacognosy of negative listed Plants. Bot Surv Ind, MOEF, KolkataGoogle Scholar
  51. Selvaraj D, Shanmughanandhan D, Sarma RK, Joseph JC, Srinivasan RV, Ramalingam S (2012) DNA barcode ITS effectively distinguishes the medicinal plant Boerhavia diffusa from its adulterants. Genom Proteom Bioinform 10:364–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Singh HK, Parveen I, Raghuvanshi S, Babbar SB (2012) The loci recommended as universal barcodes for plants on the basis of floristic studies may not work with congeneric species as exemplified by DNA barcoding of Dendrobium species. BMC Res Notes 5:42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Song J, Yao H, Li Y, Li X, Lin Y, Liu C et al (2009) Authentication of the family Polygonaceae in Chinese pharmacopoeia by DNA barcoding technique. J Ethnopharmacol 124:434–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sucher NJ, Carles MC (2008) Genome-based approaches to the authentication of medicinal plants. Planta Med 74:603–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Swetha VP, Parvathy VA, Sheeja TE, Sasikumar B (2017) Authentication of Myristica fragrans Houtt. using DNA barcoding. Food Control 73:1010–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30:2725–2729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wachtel S, Benzie IFF (2011) Herbal medicine: an introduction to its history, usage, regulation, current trends, and research needs. In: Benzie IFF, Wachtel-Galor S (eds) Herbal medicine: biomolecular and clinical aspects, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton (Chapter 1) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Warude D, Chavan P, Joshi K, Patwardhan B (2003) DNA isolation from fresh, dry plant samples with highly acidic tissue extracts. Plant Mol Biol Rep 21:467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. White TJ, Burns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 315–322Google Scholar
  60. (homepage on the internet). Ontario: Ministry of Research and Innovation.
  61. [homepage on the internet]. New Delhi: Government of India (Ministry of Ayush). Available from: http:/ Scholar
  62. Yuan QJ, Zhang B, Jiang D, Zhang WJ, Lin TY, Wang NH et al (2015) Identification of species and materia medica within Angelica L. (Umbelliferae) based on phylogeny inferred from DNA barcodes. Mol Ecol Resour 15:358–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Prof. H.S. Srivastava Foundation for Science and Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of DelhiDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations