Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 533–537 | Cite as

A quick method to screen high and low yielding wheat cultivars exposed to high temperature

  • Amit Gautam
  • Divya Agrawal
  • S. V. SaiPrasad
  • Anjana Jajoo
Short Communication

Abstract

In tropical countries, high temperature stress is the major abiotic stress, which controls the productivity and yield of crop plants. Two high yielding and low yielding genotypes of durum wheat were selected for detailed analysis of their photochemical efficiencies. In low yielding genotypes (Malvi local and Sawer local), the whole primary photochemical reactions are affected before and after heat stress. The results show that low yielding genotypes show less efficiency in the usage of the available excitation energy. This is a case study to establish use of chlorophyll a fluorescence measurement as an effective tool to screen plants for their stress tolerance. The study is important for stress physiology and may be useful for assessment of stress tolerant plants.

Keyword

Wheat genotypes High temperature Chlorophyll fluorescence 

Abbreviations

Fo

Initial fluorescence

Fm

Maximum fluorescence

Fv

Variable fluorescence

References

  1. Babani F, Lichtenthaler KH (1996) Light induced and age dependent development of chloroplasts in etiolated barley leaves as visualized by determination of photosynthetic pigments, CO2 assimilation rates and different kinds of chlorophyll fluorescence ratios. J Plant Physiol 148:555–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biswal B, Joshi NP, Raval KM, Biswal CU (2011) Photosynthesis, a global sensor of environmental stress in green plants: stress signalling and adaptation. Curr Sci 101:47–56Google Scholar
  3. Christen D, Schonmanna S, Jermini M, Strasser RJ, Defago G (2007) Characterization and early detection of grapevine [Vitis vinifera] stress responses to esca disease by in situ chlorophyll fluorescence and comparison with drought stress. Environ Exp Bot 60:504–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Georgieva K, Tsonev T, Velikova V, Yordanov I (2000) Photosynthetic activity during high temperature of pea plants. J Plant Physiol 157:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984) Statistical procedures for agricultural research, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Havaux M, Lannoye R (1985) Drought resistance of hard wheat cultivars measured by a rapid chlorophyll fluorescence test. J Agric Sci 104:501–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Joly D, Carpentier R (2009) Sigmoidal reduction kinetics of the photosystem II acceptor side in intact photosynthetic materials during fluorescence induction. Photochem Photobiol Sci 8:167–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kalaji HM, Govindjee, Bosa K, Kościelniak J, Zuk-Gołaszewska K (2011) Effects of salt stress on photosystem II efficiency and CO2 assimilation of two Syrian barley landraces. Environ Exp Bot 73:64–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kalaji HM, Jajoo A, Oukarroum A, Brestic M, Zivcak M, Samborska I, Cetner MD, Goltsev V, Ladle RJ, Dąbrowski P, Ahmad P (2014) The use of chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics analysis to study the performance of photosynthetic machinery in plants. In: Ahmad P (ed) Emerging technologies and management of crop stress tolerance, vol 2. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800875-1.00015-6
  10. Kruger GHJ, Tsimilli-Michael M, Strasser RJ (1997) Light stress provokes plastic and elastic modifications in structure and function of photosystem II in camellia leaves. Physiol Plant 101:265–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Li PL, Cheng GH, Jiang C, Peng T (2009) Heterogeneous behavior of PSII in Soybean (Glycine max) leaves with identical PSII photochemistry efficiency under different high temperature treatments. J Plant Physiol 166:1607–1615PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mathur S, Jajoo A, Mehta P, Bharti S (2011) Analysis of elevated temperature-induced inhibition of photosystem II using chlorophyll a fluorescence induction kinetics in wheat leaves (Triticum aestivum). Plant Biol 13:22–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mathur S, Agrawal D, Jajoo A (2014) Photosynthesis: limitations in response to high temperature stress. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.01.010 Google Scholar
  14. Mehta P, Jajoo A, Mathur S, Bharti S (2010) Chlorophyll a fluorescence study revealing effects of high salt stress on Photosystem II in wheat leaves. Plant Physiol Biochem 48:16–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Murchie EH, Lawson T (2013) Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis: a guide to good practice and understanding some new applications. J Exp Bot. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert208 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Percival GC (2005) The use of chlorophyll fluorescence to identify chemical and environmental stress in leaf tissue of three oak (Quercus) species. J Arboric 31(5):215–227Google Scholar
  17. Slabbert RM, Kruger GHJ (2011) Assessment of changes in photosystem II structure and function as affected by water deficit in Amaranthus hypochondriacus L. and Amaranthus hybridus L. Plant Physiol Biochem 49:978–984PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Srivastava A, Guisse B, Greppin H, Strasser RJ (1997) Regulation of antenna structure and electron transport in Photosystem II of Pisum sativum under elevated temperature probed by the fast polyphasic chlorophyll a fluorescence transient: OKJIP. Biochim Biophys Acta 1320:95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Strasser RJ, Srivastava A, Tsimilli-Michael M (2000) The fluorescence transient as a tool to characterize and screen photosynthetic samples. In: Yunus M, Pathre U, Mohanty P (eds) Probing photosynthesis: mechanisms, regulation and adaptation. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 445–483Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Prof. H.S. Srivastava Foundation for Science and Society 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amit Gautam
    • 1
  • Divya Agrawal
    • 2
  • S. V. SaiPrasad
    • 1
  • Anjana Jajoo
    • 2
  1. 1.Plant Breeding DivisionIndian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), Regional StationIndoreIndia
  2. 2.School of Life ScienceDevi Ahilya UniversityIndoreIndia

Personalised recommendations