Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 443–448 | Cite as

Spatial distribution and regeneration of Quercus semecarpifolia and Quercus floribunda in a subalpine forest of western Himalaya, India

  • Vinod K. BishtEmail author
  • Chandra P. Kuniyal
  • Bhagwati P. Nautiyal
  • P. Prasad
Short Communication


Studies were conducted on population status and regeneration of Quercus semecarpifolia and Quercus floribunda in a subalpine forest of western Himalaya. Saplings of Q. semecarpifolia belonging to the 51-100 cm size class and those of Q. floribunda belonging to the 101-150 cm size class were well represented in studied subalpine forests. Comparable seedling emergence and establishment of both species, either in the habitat dominated by same or different species seems to be an adaptational strategy of these species in subalpine forests. Seedling to tree ratio for Q. semecarpifolia was higher in the stand dominated by Q. floribunda, while comparable pattern was observed for Q. floribunda in the stand dominated by Q. semecarpifolia. Establishment of higher percent of seedlings of one species in the habitats dominated by another species of Quercus appears to indicate an oligarchic nature of oaks in subalpine forests. This study describes regeneration strategies, and spatial distribution of these species in a subalpine forest of Uttarakhand.


Adaptation strategy Oaks Oligoarchic Subalpine forests Survivorship 



Director, HRDI for extending key facilities, Dr. R. P. Singh, Editor in Chief, PMBP, Dr. S. Bhadula, Abbott Laboratories and anonymous reviewers are acknowledged for valuable suggestion.


  1. Allen SE (1974) Chemical analysis of ecological material. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, p 565Google Scholar
  2. Begon MJL, Harper JL, Townsend CR (1996) Ecology: individuals, populations and communities, 3rd edn. Blackwell Science Ltd, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bisht VK, Kuniyal CP (2013) Climate change matters because the oaks cannot move upward. Curr Sci 104(6):689–690Google Scholar
  4. Curtis JT, McIntosh RP (1950) The inter-relationship of certain analytic and synthetic phytosociological characters. Ecology 31:434–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deb P, Sundriyal RC (2008) Tree regeneration and seedling survival patterns in old-growth lowland tropical rainforest in Namdapha National Park, north-east India. For Ecol Manag 255:3995–4006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jones JB, Wolf B, Mills HA (1991) Interpretation of results. In: Plant analysis handbook—a practical sampling, preparation, analysis and interpretation guide. Micro–macro Publishing Inc, USAGoogle Scholar
  7. Kershaw KR (1973) Quantitative and dynamic plant ecology. Edwards Arnold Ltd, London, pp 247–308Google Scholar
  8. Nautiyal MC, Nautiyal BP, Prakash V (2001) Phenology and growth form distribution in an alpine pasture at Tungnath, Garhwal, Himalaya. Mt Res Dev 21(2):168–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Negi AS, Naithani HB (1995) Oaks of India, Nepal and Bhutan. International Book Distributors, DehradunGoogle Scholar
  10. Okalebo JR, Gathua KW, Woomer PL (1993) Laboratory methods of soil and plant analysis; a working manual. TSBF Programme Kenya. p 22–29Google Scholar
  11. Selvi F, Valleri M (2012) Cork oak woodlands in the north Tyrrhenian area (Italy): distribution and plant species diversity of a relict forest ecosystem. Biodivers Conserv 21:3061–3078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Shrestha BB (2003) Quercus semecarpifolia Sm. In the Himalayan region: ecology, exploitation and threats. Himalayan J Sci 1:126–128Google Scholar
  13. Singh JS, Singh SP (1992) Forest of Himalaya. Gyanodaya Prakashan, NainitalGoogle Scholar
  14. Singh G, Rai ID, Rawat GS (2011) The year 2010 was ‘mast seed year’ for the Kharsu oak (Quercus semecarpifolia Sm.) in the western Himalaya. Curr Sci 100(9):1275Google Scholar
  15. Thadani R, Ashton PMS (1995) Regeneration of banj oak (Quercus leuchotrichophora A. Camus) in the central Himalaya. For Ecol Manag 78:217–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tiwari SC (2005) Concepts of modern ecology. Dehradun. Bishen Singh and Mahendra Pal SinghGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Prof. H.S. Srivastava Foundation for Science and Society 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vinod K. Bisht
    • 1
    Email author
  • Chandra P. Kuniyal
    • 1
  • Bhagwati P. Nautiyal
    • 2
  • P. Prasad
    • 3
  1. 1.Herbal Research and Development InstituteGopeshwarIndia
  2. 2.Department of Horticulture, Aromatic and Medicinal Plants, School of Earth Sciences and Natural Resources ManagementMizoram UniversityAizwalIndia
  3. 3.High Altitude Plants Physiology Research CentreHNB Garhwal (Central) UniversitySrinagarIndia

Personalised recommendations