Advertisement

Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 202–207 | Cite as

Correlation Between Intron 4 Polymorphism of the Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Gene and Cardiovascular Risk with the Numbers of Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Healthy Subjects

Original Article
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

In the present study, we investigated the relationship between an important 27 bp repeat polymorphism in intron 4 of eNOS and numbers of circulating EPCs in presence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in a group of healthy human volunteers. The study comprised of 45 healthy subjects (30–50 years). These subjects had various degrees of CVD risk but no history of CVD. The repeat polymorphism of eNOS was detected by polymerase chain reaction and EPC levels were analyzed by flow cytometry. We observed a good association between the intronic 4 mutant a/b genotype and the combined Framingham risk factor score in our subjects (χ2 = 3.2, P = 0.07). EPC numbers in subjects with mutant eNOS a/b genotype were also less than those observed in subjects with normal eNOS b/b genotype (P = 0.06). Interestingly, subjects with eNOS a/b genotype showed a significant inverse correlation between framingham risk score and EPC numbers (R = −0.57, P < 0.05). The study suggests that the presence of CVD risk factors in subjects with eNOS intron 4 polymorphism results in reduced number of circulating EPCs, which may significantly predispose them to CVD and aberrant endothelial repair.

Keywords

Cardiovascular disease Endothelial nitric oxide synthase Endothelial progenitor cells Polymorphism 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Vice Chancellor, Gautam Buddha University for providing us the necessary facilities to perform the study. We are thankful to Dr. Nirupma Trehanpati, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi for her support in the flow cytometry experiments.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interests.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. 1.
    Asahara T, Kawamoto A, Masuda H. Concise review: circulating endothelial progenitor cells for vascular medicine. Stem Cells. 2011;29:1650–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chong MS, Ng WK, Chan JK. Concise review: endothelial progenitor cells in regenerative medicine: applications and challenges. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2016;5:530–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rumpold H, Wolf D, Koeck R, Gunsilius E. Endothelial progenitor cells: a source of therapeutic vasculogenesis. J Cell Mol Med. 2004;8:509–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hill JM, Zalos G, Halcox JP, Schenke WH, Waclawiw MA, Quyyumi AA, et al. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells, vascular function, and cardiovascular risk. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:593–600.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kaur S, Jayakumar K, Kartha CC. The potential of circulating endothelial progenitor cells to form colonies is inversely proportional to total vascular risk score in patients with coronary artery disease. Indian Heart J. 2007;59:475–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huang PH, Chen JW, Lin SJ. Effects of cardiovascular risk factors on endothelial progenitor cell. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2014;30:375–81.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Werner N, Nickenig G. Influence of cardiovascular risk factors on endothelial progenitor cells: limitations for therapy? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26:257–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Duda DG, Fukumura D, Jain RK. Role of eNOS in neovascularisation: NO for endothelial progenitor cells. Trends Mol Med. 2004;10:143–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tanus-Santos JE, Desai M, Flockhart DA. Effects of ethnicity on the distribution of clinically relevant endothelial nitric oxide variants. Pharmacogenetics. 2001;11:719–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Matyar S, Attila G, Akpinar O, Inal T. eNOS gene intron 4 a/b VNTR polymorphism is a risk factor for coronary artery disease in Southern Turkey. Clin Chim Acta. 2005;354:153–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Genest J, McPherson R, Frohlich J, Anderson T, Campbell N, Carpentier A, et al. Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia and prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult—2009 recommendations. Can J Cardiol. 2009;25:567–79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988;16:1215.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arora S, Das N, Srivastava K. Nitric oxide and eNOS gene in essential hypertension. Int J Collab Res Intern Med Public Health. 2009;1:56–71.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hristov M, Weber C. Endothelial progenitor cells: characterisation, pathophysiology, and possible clinical relevance. J Cell Mol Med. 2004;8:498–508.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang MX, Zhang C, Shen YH, Wang J, Li XN, Zhang Y, et al. Biogenesis of short intronic repeat 27-nucleotide small RNA from endothelial nitric-oxide synthase gene. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:14685–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mehrab-Mohseni M, Tabatabaei-Malazy O, Hasani-Ranjbar S, Amiri P, Kouroshnia A, Bazzaz JT, Farahani-Shrhabi M, Larijani B, Amoli MM, et al. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase VNTR (intron 4 a/b) polymorphism association with type 2 diabetes and its chronic application. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;91:348–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Aicher A, Heeschen C, Mildner-Rihm C, Urbich C, Ihling C, Technau-Ihling K, et al. Essential role of endothelial nitric oxide synthase for mobilization of stem and progenitor cells. Nat Med. 2003;9:1370–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Everaert BR, Van Craenenbroeck EM, Hoymans VY, Haine SE, Van Nassauw L, Conraads VM, et al. Current perspective of pathophysiological and interventional effects on endothelial progenitor cell biology: focus on PI3K/AKT/eNOS pathway. Int J Cardiol. 2010;144:350–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kumar TR, Uruno A, Sugawara A, Jayakumar K, Kartha CC. Genetic engineering with endothelial nitric oxide synthase improves functional properties of endothelial progenitor cells from patients with coronary artery disease: an in vitro study. Basic Res Cardiol. 2009;104:739–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kaur S, Harikrishnan VS, Radhakrishnan S, Shenoy SJ, Uruno A, Sugawara A, et al. Transfection of endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene improves angiogenic efficacy of endothelial progenitor cells in rabbits with hindlimb ischemia. J Clin Exp Cardiol. 2011;2:140. doi: 10.4172/2155-9880.1000140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moroi M, Zhang L, Yasuda T, Virmani R, Gold HK, Fishman MC, et al. Interaction of genetic deficiency of endothelial nitric oxide, gender, and pregnancy in vascular response to injury in mice. J Clin Invest. 1998;101:1225–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ragia G, Nikolaidis E, Tavridou A, Arvanitidis KI, Kanoni S, Dedoussis GV, et al. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms −786T > C and 894G > T in coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients. Hum Genomics. 2010;4:375–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Clinical Biochemists of India 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BiotechnologyGautam Buddha UniversityGreater NoidaIndia
  2. 2.School of BiotechnologyGautam Buddha UniversityGreater NoidaIndia

Personalised recommendations