Advertisement

European View

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 3–10 | Cite as

Convergence and diversity in political campaigning in Europe

  • Wojciech Gagatek
Article
  • 193 Downloads

Abstract

This review paper takes stock of the reasons for, and explanations of, convergence and diversity in political campaigning in Europe. Convergence is primarily related to growing homogenisation practices resulting from the Americanisation or globalisation of campaigning, in particular through the common use of new media. Diversity, in contrast, stems from differences in structural and contextual country-specific features, such as different electoral laws, media systems or political culture. The biggest gap that exists in this field of study, despite recent improvements, concerns insufficient attempts to quantify campaign practices that would allow better capture of the degree of either convergence or divergence.

Keywords

Europe Political campaigning Political parties Professionalisation 

References

  1. Eurostat. (2013). Individuals: Frequency of Internet use. http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=isoc_ci_ifp_fu&lang=en. Accessed 18 March 2013.
  2. Farrell, D. M., & Schmitt-Beck, R. (2002). Do political campaigns matter? Campaign effects in elections and referendums. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Farrell, D. M., & Webb, P. (2002). Political parties as campaign organizations. In R. J. Dalton & M. P. Wattenberg (eds.), Parties without partisans: Political change in advanced industrial democracies (pp. 129–153). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Gagatek, W. (2010). Campaigning in the European Parliament elections. In W. Gagatek (ed.), The 2009 elections to the European Parliament. Country reports (pp. 13–19). Florence: European University Institute. http://cadmus.eui.eu/dspace/bitstream/1814/13757/1/EUDO_2009-EP-Elections_CountryReports.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2013.
  5. Gagatek, W. (2011). The Treaty of Lisbon, the European Parliament elections, and Europarties: A new playing field for 2014? Yearbook of Polish European Studies, 14, 201–218.Google Scholar
  6. Gibson, R. K., & Römmele, A. (2001). Changing campaign communications: A party-centered theory of professionalized campaigning. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 6(4), 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gibson, R. K., & Römmele, A. (2009). Measuring the professionalization of political campaigning. Party Politics, 15(3), 265–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Katz, R. S., & Mair, P. (1995). Changing models of party organization and party democracy: The emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics, 1(1), 5–28. doi: 10.1177/1354068895001001001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lees-Marshment, J., Rudd, C., & Stromback, J. (eds.). (2009). Global political marketing (1st edn.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Mazzoleni, G., & Schulz, W. (1999). ‘Mediatization’ of politics: A challenge for democracy? Political Communication, 16(3), 247–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Negrine, R. (2007). The professionalisation of political communication in Europe. In R. Negrine (ed.), The professionalisation of political communication (pp. 27–44). Bristol: Intellect Books.Google Scholar
  13. Negrine, R., & Papathanassopoulos, S. (1996). The ‘Americanization’ of political communication: A critique. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 1(2), 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Norris, P. (2000). A virtuous circle: Political communications in postindustrial societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Norris, P. (2011). Political communications. In D. Caramani (ed.), Comparative politics (2nd edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ohman, M. (2012). Political finance regulations around the world: An overview of the International IDEA database. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. http://www.idea.int/publications/political-finance-regulations/index.cfm. Accessed 15 March 2013.
  17. Panebianco, A. (1988). Political parties: Organization and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Plasser, F., Scheucher, C., & Senft, C. (1999). Is there a European style of political marketing? A survey of political managers and consultants. In B. Newman (ed.), A handbook of political marketing (pp. 89–112). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Scammell, M. (2007). Political brands and consumer citizens: The rebranding of Tony Blair. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611(1), 176–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Seybert, H. (2012). Internet use in households and by individuals in 2012. Eurostat, Statistics in Focus 50/2012. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-SF-12-050/EN/KS-SF-12-050-EN.PDF. Accessed 15 March 2013.
  21. Strömbäck, J. (2007). Political marketing and professionalized campaigning. Journal of Political Marketing, 6(2–3), 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tenscher, J., Mykkänen, J., & Moring, T. (2012). Modes of professional campaigning: A four-country comparison in the European Parliamentary elections, 2009. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 17(2), 145–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Xifra, J. (2011). Americanization, globalization, or modernization of electoral campaigns? Testing the situation in Spain. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(6), 667–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Centre for European Studies 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centrum EuropejskieUniwersytet WarszawskiWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations