Assessment of steam forming performance of aluminum sheet metal based on experimental studies

  • Salah AissaEmail author
  • Rezgui Mohamed Ali
  • Ayadi Mahfoudh
Original Research


This work presents an experimental study of aluminum sheet forming. It shows the performances of a steam hydroforming process. The new forming technique is based on both temperature and pressure to make a sheet form. These parameters are linked to the water vaporization process into a cavity covered by the blank. The performances are deduced by comparing the results obtained from the steam tests with those acquired at room temperature. Performances are expressed in terms of forming loads, surface creation, and forming limits. The experimental results show that the use of the steam temperature as a factor could decrease the limit loads necessary for the forming operation and increase the surface creation. On top of improving forming loads and surface creation, increasing steam temperature induces a clear improvement of forming limits.


Experimental test Performance Steam forming Sheet forming 



This study was financially supported by the Higher Institute of Technological Studies of Sousse. The authors would like to take this opportunity to express their sincere appreciation to the manager and the Department Head of Mechanical Engineering.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Ahmetoglu M, Altan T (2000) Tube hydroforming: state of the art and future trends. J Mater Process Technol 98(1):25–33. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bihamta R, D’Amours G, Bui Q-H, Guillot M, Raham A, Fafard M (2013) Numerical and experimental studies on the new design concept of hydroforming dies for complex tubes. Mater Des 47:766–778. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vasile C, Sorin G (2018) Determination of the force required for the hydroforming of al 99,5.MATEC web of conferences 244, 01003 ITEP’18,
  4. 4.
    Lang LH, Wang ZR, Kang DC, Yuan SJ, Zhang SH, Danckert J, Nielsen KB (2004) Hydro- forming highlights: sheet hydro forming and tube hydro forming. J Mater Process Technol 151:165–177. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ch H (2005) Research and advances in fundamentals and industrial application of hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol 167(4):383–392. Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang SH, Zong-Ren Wang YX, Wang ZT, Zhou LX (2004) Recent developments in sheet hydroforming technology. J Mater Process Technol 151(1–3):237–241. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhubin H, Shijian Y, Gang L, Jia W, Weiwei C (2010) Formability testing of AZ31B magnesium alloy tube at elevated temperature. J Mater Process Technol 210:877–884. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mahfoudh A, Cherouat A, Slimani F, Mohamed-Ali R, Ali Z (2011) Experimental and numerical modeling of thermo-forming of anisotropic thin sheet. Appl Mech Mater 62:37–48. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yuan S, Qi J, He Z (2006) An experimental investigation into the formability of hydroforming 5A02 Al-tubes at elevated temperature. J Mater Process Technol 177(1-3):680–683. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sasawat M, Muammer K (2010) Materiel behavior and formability of magnesium AZ31 sheet under hydroforming conditions. Mater forum 34:105–109Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grüner M, Gnibl T, Merklein M (2014) Blank hydroforming using granular material as medium-investigations on leakage. Procedia Eng 81:1035–1042. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maeno T, Mori KI, Unou C (2014) Improvement of die filling by prevention of temperature drop in gas forming of aluminium alloy tube using air filled into sealed tube and resistance heating. Procedia Eng 81:2237–2242. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Siegert K, Jäger S, Vulcan M (2003) Pneumatic bulging of magnesium AZ31 sheet metals at elevated temperatures. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 52(1):241–244. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nassar H, Albakri M, Pan H, Khraisheh M (2012) On the gas pressure forming of aluminium foam sandwich panels; experiments and numerical simulations. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61(1):243–246. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Siegert K, Jaeger S (2004) Pneumatic bulging of magnesium AZ31 sheet metal at elevated temperatures. The Minerals Metals & Materials Society:87–90Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Salah A, Soula M, Lazgueb T (2017) Experimental study of steam hydroforming of aluminum sheet metal. Exp Techniquesdoi 41(5).
  17. 17.
    Siegert K, Wagner S (1994) Formability characteristics of Aluminium sheet. European Aluminium AssociationGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Slimani F (2008) Approche expérimental pour la construction et la prédiction des courbes limites de formage des tôles. Diplôme de master, Institut Supérieur des Sciences Appliquées et de Technologie de SousseGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    dos Santos Rodrigues LC (2015) Constitutive parameters identification of metal sheets using circular bulge tests. University of Coimbra, PhD thesisGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Choung JM, Cho SR (2008) Study on true stress correction from tensile tests. J Mech Sci Technol 22(6):1039–1051. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Salah Aissa
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rezgui Mohamed Ali
    • 2
  • Ayadi Mahfoudh
    • 3
  1. 1.Laboratory of Applied Mechanics and Engineering ENITUniversity of Tunis El ManarTunisTunisia
  2. 2.UR-MSSDT (99-UR11-46), ENSITUniversity of TunisTunisTunisia
  3. 3.National Engineering School of BizerteUniversity of CarthageCarthageTunisia

Personalised recommendations