Advertisement

Numerical analysis and experimental investigation of surface defects in die hemming process

  • Gang WangEmail author
  • Zhengwei Gu
  • Hong Xu
  • Ge Yu
Original Research
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

Hemming is the main assembly process used for auto-body panels. Surface defects resulting from the hemming operation may significantly influence the appearance aesthetics of an automobile. The formation of surface defects can be forestalled, and the process can be optimized and compensated by the numerical simulation method during the process design stage. In this study, the hemming assembly of a fuel tank cap is chosen as the research object, and the specimen is made of DX54D + Z deep drawing steel sheet. Numerical simulation and forming experiments have been carried out. It was found that the surface defect index can be expressed as the weighted sum of the design variable effects by simulation and orthogonal design. In addition, the magnitude of each effect can be ranked from the most significant to the least significant. Using this information helps to obtain an optimal hemming process plan. However, process parameter optimization cannot completely eliminate surface defects. The surface compensation of tool geometry based on the continuity of curvature was used to eliminate the surface lows and the hemming test results indicated that the obtained component was of the required quality.

Keywords

Surface defect Die hemming Numerical simulation Process optimization Surface compensation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to FAW Tooling Die Manufacturing Co., Ltd. for their valuable help in the experimental part.

Funding

This study was funded by the Technology Development Program of Jilin Province (20160204058GX).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Liewald M, Hönle S, Sindel M (2016) Surface roughening of an aluminum 6016 alloy during bending and hemming. Int J Mater Form 9(2):203–213.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-015-1223-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maoût NL, Thuillier S, Manach PY (2010) Drawing, flanging and hemming of metallic thin sheets: a multi-step process. Mater Des 31(6):2725–2736.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.01.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Esquivel E, Carbone G, Ceccarelli M, Jáuregui J (2016) Requirements and constraints for a robotized roll hemming solution. RAAD 2016: Advances in robot design and intelligent control, pp 244-251.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49058-8_27
  4. 4.
    Sun ZZ, Yang YY, Shi L (2008) Experimental study on controlling technique of surface deflection. J Mater Process Technol 199(1-3):445–447.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.07.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Andersson A (2009) Evaluation and visualisation of surface defects on auto-body panels. J Mater Process Technol 209(2):821–837.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.02.078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Park CD, Chung WJ, Kim BM (2007) A numerical and experimental study of surface deflections in automobile exterior panels. J Mater Process Technol 187-188:99–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nordström M, Järvstråt N (2009) An appearance-based measure of surface defects. Int J Mater Form 2(2):83–91.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-009-0393-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yang YY, Zhao LH, Sun ZZ (2007) Study on mechanism of cylindrical shallow shell surface deflection. J Mater Process Technol 187-188:145–149.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Le Port A, Thuillier S, Manach PY (2010) Occurrence and numerical prediction of surface defects during flanging of metallic sheets. Int J Mater Form 3(3):215–223.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-009-0677-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Le Port A, Thuillier S, Manach PY (2011) Characterization of surface defects after flanging of metallic sheets. J Mater Process Technol 211(12):2062–2071.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shen HQ, Li SH, Chen GL (2012) Quantitative analysis of surface deflections in the automobile exterior panel based on a curvature-deviation method. J Mater Process Technol 212(7):1548–1556.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.03.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shen HQ, Li SH, Ni XF, Chen GL (2013) A modified displacement adjustment method to compensate for surface deflections in the automobile exterior panels. J Mater Process Technol 213(11):1943–1953.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.05.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weinschenk A, Volk W (2017) Strategy to prevent surface deflections for automotive sheet metal parts. J Phys Conf Ser 896:012058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hu Y, Zhu X, Lee W (2008) Surface low prediction using ls-dyna and dynaform. In: Numisheet 2008, September. Interlaken, Switzerland, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chung WJ, Kim WS, Kim JH, Seo JH, Jung TC (2011) Evaluation of surface deflection in automobile exterior panel by curvature based method. In: Numisheet 2011, AIP Conf. Proc 1383:1072–1077Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang XZ (2011) Tool wear prediction using AutoForm software. In: tool wear prediction modeling for sheet metal stamping die in automotive manufacture. PhD thesis. Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, pp 52–70Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Materials Science and EngineeringJilin UniversityChangchunChina

Personalised recommendations