Semi-analytical approach for plane strain sheet metal forming using a bending-under-tension numerical model
- 374 Downloads
In this paper, we revisit the plane strain deep-drawing process. We show that a detailed analysis of the physical process may result in a dramatic reduction of computing time when the problem is split into several regions undergoing well-defined loading paths. The proposed approach allows us to assess the springback of the formed sheet in a quasi-instant time and is thus suitable in the initial design phase and provides a fast and economical way to determine the influence of the numerous parameters involved in sheet metal forming. We present a semi-analytical model that has been developed for sheet metal forming mainly subjected to plane strain bending-under-tension and involving large strains. The sheet is considered to be an assembly of regions where the loading is considered homogeneous in the length direction. A handful of finite elements or even a single element is sufficient to compute the loading path followed by each region. The contact is circumvented by constraining the kinematics with appropriate boundary conditions and the approach is valid for any material behavior law. The semi-analytical model is applied to standard test cases and then compared with full-scale simulations.
KeywordsSheet metal forming Springback Reduced model Semi-analytical method Deep-drawing Plane strain
This research was conducted as part of the OASIS project, supported by OSEO within the contract FUI no.F1012003Z.
The authors acknowledge the support of Labex MS2T.
- 5.Brem JC, Barlat F, Fridy JM (2002) Free bending benchmark testing of 6111-T4 aluminium alloy sample. In: Numisheet Conference, KoreaGoogle Scholar
- 8.Code_Aster (2009) Analysis of structures and thermomechanics for studies & research. EDF–R&DGoogle Scholar
- 9.Da Silva Botelho T, Bayraktar E, Inglebert G (2006) Comparison of experimental and simulation results of 2D-draw-bend springback. J Achiev Mater Manuf Eng 18:275–278Google Scholar
- 10.Duncan J, Shabel B, Filho J (1978) A tensile strip test for evaluating friction in sheet metal forming. Tech. rep., SAE Technical Paper 780391Google Scholar
- 11.Hallquist JO (2006) LS-DYNA theory manual. Livermore Software Technology CorporationGoogle Scholar
- 13.Konter AWA (2005) Advanced finite element contact benchmarks. Tech. Rep., FENETGoogle Scholar
- 15.Makinouchi A, Nakamachi E, Onate E, Wagoner RH (1993) Guide to the benchmark test—simulation and experiment. Numisheet’93 conference, The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research, pp 32–39Google Scholar