Reactive Functionalized Multilayer Polymers in a Coextrusion Process: Experimental and Theoretical Investigations of Interfacial Instabilities

  • K. Lamnawar
  • A. MaazouzEmail author
  • P. Laure
Symposium MS11: Processing of polymers


Coextrusion technologies are commonly used to produce multilayered composite sheets or films for a large range of applications from food packaging to optics. The contrast of rheological properties between layers can lead to interfacial instabilities during flow. Important theoretical and experimental advances regarding the stability of compatible and incompatible polymers have, during the last decades, been made using a mechanical approach. However, few research efforts have been dedicated to the physicochemical affinity between the neighboring layers. The present study deals with the influence of this affinity on interfacial instabilities for functionalized incompatible polymers. Polyamide (PA6)/polyethylene grafted with glycidyl methacrylate (PE-GMA) was used as a reactive system and PE/PA6 as a non reactive one. Two grades of polyamide (PA6) were used in order to change the viscosity and elasticity ratios between PE (or PE-GMA) and PA6. It was experimentally confirmed, in this case, that weak disturbance can be predicted by considering an interphase of non-zero thickness (corresponding to an interdiffusion/reaction zone) instead of a purely geometrical interface between the two reactive layers. According to rheological investigations from previous work, an experimental strategy was here formulated to optimize the process by listing the parameters that controlled the stability of the reactive multilayer flows. Plastic films with two layers were coextruded in symmetrical and asymmetrical configurations in which PA6 was the middle layer. Indeed, for reactive multilayered systems, the interfacial flow instability could be reduced or eliminated, for instance, by (i) increasing the residence time or temperature in the coextrusion bloc (for T above the reaction temperature T = 240°C), and (ii) reducing the total extrusion flow rate. The reaction rate/compatibilization played a major role that must be taken into account. Furthermore, the role of the viscosity ratio, elasticity ratio, and layer ratio of the stability of the interface were also investigated coupling to the physicochemical affinity. The results show that it is necessary to obtain links between the classic factors that are introduced in the evaluation of the theoretical, given by linear stability analysis/longwave asymptotic investigations, and its corresponding experimental stability charts. Hence, based on this analysis, guide-lines for a stable coextrusion of reactive functionalized polymers can be provided.

Key words

Coextrusion Interfacial instabilities Rheology Interdiffusion/reaction Interphase Multilaye 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    El Kissi N., Piau J-M., Chaigneau R., Rhéologie 4, 1–17 (2003).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yih, C.S., J. Fluid Mech., 27 (2), 337–352 (1967).zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hooper A.P., Phys. Fluids, 28, 1613–1619 (1985).zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hooper, A.P., Boyd, W.G.C., J. Fluid Mech., 128, 507–528 (1983).zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yiantsios, S.G., Higgins, B.G., Phys. Fluids, 31 (11), 3225–;3238 (1988).zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anturkar, N.R., Papanastasiou, T.C., Wilkes, J.O., AIChE Journal, 35 (5), 710–724 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anturkar, N.R., Papanastasiou, T.C., Wilkes, J.O., Phys. Fluids A, 2 (4), 530–541 (1990).zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Joseph, D.D., Renardy, Y.Y., Fundamentals of Two-Fluid Dynamics, Part I: Mathematical Theory and Applications, Springer- Verlag, New-York, (1992).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Han, C.D., J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 17, 1289–1303 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khan, A.A., Han, C.D., Trans. Soc. Rheol., 20 (4), 595–621 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karagiannis, A., Mavridis, H., Hrymak, A.N., Vlachopoulos, J., Polym. Eng. Sci., 28 (15), 982–988, (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    White, J.L., Ufford, R.C., Dharod, K.R., Price, R.L., J. Appl. Poly. Sci., 16, 1313–1330 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wilson, G.M., Khomami, B., J. of Non-Newt. Fluid Mech., 45, 355–384 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wilson, G.M., Khomami, B., J. Rheol., 37 (2), 315–339(1993a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Valette, R., Laure, P., Demay, Y., Agassant, J.-F., J. Non-Newt. Fluid Mech., 121, 41–53 (2004).zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Valette, R., Laure, P., Demay, Y., Agassant, J.-F., Int. Polym. Process., XVIII–2, 171–178 (2003).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    (a) Khalid Lamnawar, Maazouz A, Rheol. Acta, (45), 411–424 (2006). (b) Khalid Lamnawar, Maazouz A, Rheol. Acta, paper 244 (In press 2007).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bousmina M, Palierne J.F, Utracki L.A, Polym. Engin. & Science 39, 1049–1059 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Koriyama H, Oyama HT, Ougizawa T, Inoue T, Weber M, Koch E. Polymer 40, 6381 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Patlazhan S., Schlatter G., Serra C., Bouquey M., Muller R, Polymer 47, 6099–6106 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    (a) Khalid Lamnawar, A MAAZOUZ, AIP Conf. Proc. (907): 908–914 (2007). (b) Khalid Lamnawar, PHD thesis, INSA-Lyon (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer/ESAFORM 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ingénierie des Matériaux Polymères-(IMP/LMM)UMR-CNRS 5223, INSA-LyonVilleurbanne CedexFrance
  2. 2.Centre de Mise Forme des MatériauxEcole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de ParisSophia AntipolisFrance

Personalised recommendations