Submergence Tolerant Rice: SUB1’s Journey from Landrace to Modern Cultivar
- 7.9k Downloads
Rice landraces tolerant of up to 2 weeks of complete submergence were collected from farmers’ fields in the 1950s. Success in fine mapping of SUBMERGENCE 1 (SUB1), a robust quantitative trait locus from the submergence tolerant FR13A landrace, has enabled marker-assisted breeding of high-yielding rice capable of enduring transient complete submergence. At the molecular level, SUB1 is a variable polygenic locus encoding two or three ethylene responsive factor (ERF) DNA binding proteins. All Oryza sativa accessions encode SUB1B and SUB1C at this locus. An additional ERF, SUB1A, is present at SUB1 in FR13A and other tolerant accessions. The induction of SUB1A expression by ethylene during submergence disrupts the elongation escape strategy typical of lowland and deepwater rice, by limiting ethylene-induced gibberellic acid-promoted elongation. Microarray and metabolite studies confirm that SUB1A orchestrates its effects on metabolism and growth in a submergence-dependent manner. Due to the conditional activity of SUB1A, new “Sub1” mega-varieties effectively provide submergence tolerance without apparent ill effect on development, productivity, or grain quality.
KeywordsEthylene responsive factor FR13A Gibberellic acid Mega-variety SUB1A
Of the lowland rainfed rice farms worldwide, over 22 million hectares are vulnerable to flash flooding, representing 18% of the global supply of rice (Khush 1984). An estimated ten million hectares in Bangladesh and India alone are marginalized by the threat of flooding each Monsoon season (Huke and Huke 1997). As a coping strategy, farmers have traditionally cultivated chronically flood-prone lowlands with landraces that can endure 10 days or more of complete submergence and resume growth upon de-submergence (Catling 1992). However, these submergence tolerant landraces produce less than 2 t of grain ha−1, paling in comparison to the 6–8-t of grain ha−1 yields of advanced semi-dwarf varieties. Unfortunately, the popular “mega-varieties” grown in large areas of Asia are sensitive to complete submergence and usually die within 7 days of complete inundation. A challenge recognized by breeders in the 1970s was the need to improve yields in the rainfed lowlands by introduction of submergence tolerance to high yielding varieties (Mackill et al. 1996).
Early breeding of submergence tolerant rice
Mapping and molecular characterization of SUB1
The positional cloning of SUB1 was accomplished by identifying a contiguous set of BAC and binary clones spanning the region, using the intolerant indica Teqing and the tolerant FR13A derivative IR40931-26, respectively. This resolved a chromosomal integral, from marker CR25K to SSR1A that varies in length, structure, and gene content in the japonica and indica genomes, using Nipponbare and Teqing as representatives. The sequencing of the Teqing BAC contig in the SUB1 region confirmed the presence of ∼50% interspersed sequences of transposon or retrotransposon origin (Xu et al. 2006). Recombination suppression in this region was associated with an inversion and large deletion, between markers 101O9L and 14A11-71K, in japonica relative to submergence intolerant Teqing and tolerant IR40931-26.
Submergence stress and energy management
Submergence imposes a complex abiotic stress (Setter et al. 1997; Jackson and Ram 2003; Sarkar et al. 2006; Bailey-Serres and Voesenek 2008), and the extent of injury caused by complete submergence is largely dependent on floodwater conditions, particularly its temperature, turbidity, and the extent of light penetration (Das et al. 2009). The 104-fold reduction in diffusion of gases in water relative to air limits the exchange of carbon dioxide and oxygen necessary for photosynthesis and respiration and increases the cellular concentration of the gaseous hormone ethylene. The reduction in light energy that reaches underwater leaves, especially in turbid waters, hastens chlorosis and leaf senescence (Ella et al. 2003). The stress can alter the availability and uptake of soil nutrients.
The major consequence of submergence is a reduction in photosynthesis and respiration. This is mitigated to some extent by thin gas films that form on the surface of submerged leaves, providing a microenvironment for efficient exchange of carbon dioxide and oxygen (Pedersen et al. 2009). However, complete submergence dramatically reduces the amount of oxygen that reaches roots via aerenchyma, limiting root development. Thus, an inevitable impact of submergence is a reduction in photosynthate and ATP production, limiting energy available for shoot and root growth. Despite this constraint, submergence intolerant cultivars typically accelerate the rate of stem and leaf elongation relative to non-submerged plants, which resembles the pronounced and effective internodal elongation of partially submerged deepwater rice. If the flood is deep, then elongating leaves may fail to reach the air–water interface before energy reserves are exhausted.
Through evaluation of near-isogenic lines differing only at the SUB1 locus, Fukao et al. (2006) demonstrated that genotypes lacking submergence-induced SUB1A-1 rapidly consume leaf starch and soluble sugars to maintain elongation growth during submergence. By contrast, genotypes with the SUB1 haplotype introgressed from FR13A consume carbohydrate energy reserves more slowly during submergence, maintaining growth at a rate similar to plants in air. When 14-day-old plants were submerged for 16 days, the viability of the SUB1 line (M202(SUB1)) was 98%, whereas that of the non-tolerant japonica (M202) was 10%. The low viability of M202 coincided with three times more shoot elongation. Findings with these near-isogenic lines were generally consistent with early studies that compared FR13A to unrelated submergence intolerant varieties. Overall, the submergence tolerance conferred by the SUB1 haplotype from FR13A is correlated with better maintenance of total soluble carbohydrates and limited elongation growth, lower aldehyde contents, less chlorophyll degradation, and less oxidative damage upon reoxygenation (Jackson and Ram 2003; Setter and Laureles 1996; Setter et al. 1997; Singh et al. 2001; Ella et al. 2003; Das et al. 2005; Fukao et al. 2006; Fukao and Bailey-Serres 2008). The finding of strong SUB1A-1 promoter activity in internodes and in the collar region and leaf base is consistent with a role in suppressing division and elongation of cells (Singh et al. 2010).
Submergence tolerance provided by SUB1A—escape versus quiescence
The distinction in submergence response strategy displayed by the landrace FR13A and deepwater rice illustrates a delicate balance between utilization versus conservation of reserves when overall energy production is compromised. In the case of a slow rising flood, investment of energy into elongation growth is a successful survival strategy. However, when the flood is deep and prolonged, the protection of energy reserves and growth meristems provides an advantage. Remarkably, the phytohormone ethylene and multigenic loci encoding ERFs control the distinct response strategies of submergence tolerant and deepwater rice. In both cases, the transcription of specific ERFs is promoted by submergence through the increase in cellular ethylene content in underwater organs (Fukao et al. 2006; Hattori et al. 2009; Fig. 3; Fig. 7).
Ethylene drives accumulation of SUB1A mRNA. The comparison of M202(SUB1) and M202 determined that ethylene evolution is significantly more pronounced in the submergence intolerant genotype M202 as compared to M202(SUB1), indicating that SUB1A directly or indirectly limits the further production of ethylene in submerged organs (Fukao and Bailey-Serres 2008). The increase in cellular ethylene levels also promotes accumulation of transcripts encoding ABA 8′-hydroxylases (ABA8ox), stimulating the catabolism of bioactive ABA to the unstable intermediate 8′-hydroxy ABA (Saika et al. 2007), which is spontaneously converted to phaseic acid (PA), and further reduced to inactive dihydrophaseic acid. Although ABA and PA levels decline to a similar extent in submerged leaves of both M202 and M202(SUB1), the presence of SUB1A influences the downstream GA-mediated response.
More specifically, genotypes with SUB1A-1, i.e., M202(SUB1) or transgenic japonica constitutively expressing SUB1A-1, restrict the decline in the GA signaling repressors SLENDER RICE 1 (SLR1) and SLR1-LIKE 1 (SLRL1) in submerged shoots (Fukao and Bailey-Serres 2008). SLR1 is a DELLA domain-containing transcription factor that is degraded by the 26S proteasome in the presence of GA due to formation of a complex with GA and the GA-receptor. SLRL1 is a related protein that lacks the DELLA domain and is turned over by an unknown mechanism. The activation of SUB1A promotes both an increase in expression of SLR1 and SLRL1 mRNAs and maintenance of these proteins during submergence. Ethylene exposure is sufficient to promote the SUB1A-dependent elevation of SLR1 and SLRL1, resulting in a restriction in GA-induced elongation growth. By contrast, ethylene treatment promotes GA-induced elongation of shoots in M202. Consistent with these findings, downstream GA-induced responses are more evident in submergence intolerant accessions. These responses include elevation of SUB1C as well as expansin, α-amylase, and sucrose synthase mRNAs associated with cell wall loosening required for cell expansion, starch, and sucrose catabolism, respectively (Fukao et al. 2006; Fukao and Bailey-Serres 2008).
A recent transcriptome profiling study found that SUB1A-1 regulated levels of mRNAs encoding proteins associated with ethylene responses, GA biosynthesis, and cytokinin-mediated processes (Jung et al. 2010). The presence of SUB1A-1 also markedly affected submergence-regulated levels of mRNAs encoding transcription factors, with 16 of the 36 upregulated mRNAs encoding members of the ERF superfamily (i.e., ERF groups IIc, VII, and VIIIa). Future molecular characterization of the AP2/ERFs, which act downstream of SUB1A-1, should provide an understanding of the network of transcription factors that influences hormonal, metabolic, and developmental adjustments to submergence.
Breeding of Sub1 mega-varieties
Although complete submergence is a common natural disaster that damages rice production in many rice-growing areas throughout the world, all commercially important cultivars are intolerant to the stress. The identification of the SUB1 QTL enabled its transfer by marker-assisted backcrossing (MABC) into the farmer-preferred varieties (Xu et al. 2004; Mackill 2006). The gene-level analyses of the SUB1 region resolved single nucleotide polymorphisms within SUB1A and SUB1C that could be used for molecular markers and in precision breeding (Neeraja et al. 2007; Septiningsih et al. 2009). Using MABC, a small genomic region containing SUB1A has been introgressed into modern high-yielding varieties, such as Swarna, Samba Mahsuri, IR64, Thadokkam 1 (TDK1), CR1009, and BR11 (Septiningsih et al. 2009). Microsatellite markers that were polymorphic between the two parents were used to ensure that the recurrent parent genome was combined with the SUB1 region originally from FR13A on chromosome 9. Multiple evaluations of submergence tolerance in the greenhouse and farmers’ fields confirmed that all “Sub1” lines exhibit significantly greater tolerance to complete submergence as compared with their original parents (Sarkar et al. 2009; Septiningsih et al. 2009; Singh et al. 2009; Fig. 8).
These studies indicate that the introgression of the SUB1 region of FR13A through MABC is widely applicable to diverse genetic backgrounds. In addition to submergence tolerance, the effect of SUB1 on growth, maturation, grain production, and grain quality was assessed in Swarna-Sub1, IR64-Sub1, and Samba Mahsuri-Sub1. Comparative analysis of the three Sub1 varieties and their original parents revealed that introgression of SUB1 does not negatively affect agronomical performance including yield and grain quality under regular growth conditions (Sarkar et al. 2006, 2009; Neeraja et al. 2007; Singh et al. 2009). In intolerant varieties, complete inundation at the vegetative stage considerably decreases number of panicles, number of grains per panicle, and grain-filling percentage and delayed flowering and maturity, causing a dramatic decline in grain yield. Sub1 rice minimizes the reduction of these reproductive traits by a submergence event and produces three- to sixfold more grain by weight than the non-Sub1 varieties (Singh et al. 2009).
Sub1 Rice in Farmers’ Fields
The major benefit of using the MABC approach is the resultant Sub1 varieties retain all the desirable features of the recurrent parent, especially the yield and quality characteristics. One explanation for the lack of adoption of previously developed Sub1 varieties such as IR49830-7-1-2-2 (Mackill 2006) was that genomic regions from the non-recurrent parent remained. Varieties with the SUB1 region from FR13A have the same yield, and other agronomic and grain quality characteristics as the original varieties when grown under shallow paddy conditions in the field; however, when subject to complete submergence for 7 to 15 days, these varieties showed considerable yield advantages (Singh et al. 2009; Sarkar et al. 2009). With the Sub1 mega-varieties, dissemination and adoption is more straightforward, because the main aim is the replacement of the original mega variety with an improved submergence-tolerant version. The adoption of the Sub1 mega-varieties in non-flood-prone areas is likewise not a problem. Importantly, these introgression lines can also replace some of the low-yielding traditional landraces currently being used by farmers in submergence-prone areas, augmenting yields in typically marginalized fields.
Some of these tolerant lines were evaluated for their preferences and adoption by farmers in flood-prone areas in over ten countries in South and Southeast Asia over several years, in trials conducted in farmers’ fields (Manzanilla et al. 2010, personal communication). Data from these trials demonstrated the consistent performance of these lines, validating the effectiveness of SUB1 in conferring tolerance of submergence, independent of the genetic background of the recipient variety or the environment where it is grown. The field performance of the new lines has encouraged many national rice improvement programs in Asia to commence rapid seed multiplication and dissemination schemes. For example, in 2009–2010, Swarna-Sub1 was released in India, Indonesia, and Bangladesh; BR11-Sub1 was released in Bangladesh; and IR64-Sub1 was released in the Philippines and Indonesia. Additional varieties are being introgressed with SUB1 at IRRI and by national breeding programs in several countries in Asia.
The marker-assisted introgression of the SUB1 region has successfully improved submergence tolerance in a wide range of mega-varieties without any penalties on development, yield, and grain quality (Sarkar et al. 2006, 2009; Neeraja et al. 2007; Singh et al. 2009). These new lines endure submergence, as long as the flood occurs after the seedling stage but before flowering and the flood completely subsides within 10 to 20 days, depending on floodwater conditions (Das et al. 2009). Although vegetative growth is restricted in some SUB1 varieties until the water level drops to 10–15 cm, mainly because of short stature, our recent studies showed that this is not the case when SUB1 is transferred into taller varieties or those with better tolerance of partial stagnant flooding (20–50 cm). The yield advantage provided by Sub1 introgression lines is anticipated to greatly stabilize production in rainfed lowland environments that experience flash flooding.
In contrast to Sub1 rice, deepwater rice escapes stagnant partial flooding by promoting elongation of internodes (Catling 1992; Hattori et al. 2009; Voesenek and Bailey-Serres 2009). Because the deepwater rice genes SK1/SK2 and the submergence tolerance gene SUB1A regulate ethylene-mediated GA responsiveness in an opposing manner, it seems unlikely that they can be combined to generate genotypes resilient of both stagnant flooding and submergence. However, greater understanding of the regulatory networks critical to balancing energy management and growth during submergence may identify natural genetic diversity in additional loci that can be used to improve the adaptability of rice to submergence. Along these lines, FR13A and other varieties have loci that map to regions other than SUB1 that improve submergence tolerance (Septiningsih et al. 2009; Singh et al. 2009). The reevaluation of QTLs from FR13A and moderately tolerant varieties lacking SUB1A-1 may enable further improvement of submergence tolerance.
The development of Sub1 rice largely spans the 50 years of pioneering research at the International Rice Research Institute (1960–2010). Further increase of rice production in marginal growing areas is needed. Targets that may aid in this objective include the generation of rice genotypes that combine submergence tolerance with tolerance of other abiotic and biotic stresses and grain quality attributes that match local consumers’ preferences. For example, rice capable of germination and early coleoptile elongation in anaerobic soil has recently been identified and incorporated as a breeding target at IRRI (Ismail et al. 2009; Angaji et al. 2010; Ella et al. 2010) for direct seeding. This trait can be paired with SUB1 if the two traits are expressed in specific developmental windows. In flood-prone tidal areas, farmers would benefit from rice that is tolerant of saline floodwaters, and in non-irrigated lowland areas that rely on natural rainfall for water, farmers will benefit from rice endowed with improved drought tolerance. The successful combination of submergence tolerance with other traits is likely to involve recognition of landraces with trait attributes that are unraveled at the genetic and molecular levels before their return to the farmer’s field in improved varieties. Given the suite of post-genomic era tools and the breadth of the rice germplasm collection, these challenges will hopefully be accomplished with the haste needed to meet the world’s food needs.
Flooding research in the Bailey-Serres lab is supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (2008-35100-04528) and the National Science Foundation (IOS-0750811). Research at IRRI was partially supported by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
- Das KK, Sarkar RK, Ismail AM. Elongation ability and non-structural carbohydrate levels in relation to submergence tolerance in rice. Plant Sci. 2005;168:131–136.Google Scholar
- Ella ES, Dionisio-Sese ML, Ismail AM. Proper management improves seedling survival and growth during early flooding in contrasting rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes. Crop Sci. 2010. doi:10.2135/cropsci201.
- HilleRisLambers D, Vergara BS. Summary results of an international collaboration on screening methods for flood tolerance. Proceedings of the 1981 International Deepwater Rice Workshop. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines; 1982. p. 347–353.Google Scholar
- Huke RE, Huke EH. Rice area by type of culture. South, Southeast, and East Asia. A revised and updated database. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines; 1997.Google Scholar
- Khush GS. Terminology of rice growing environments. Manila, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute; 1984. p. 5–10.Google Scholar
- Mackill DJ. Breeding for resistance to abiotic stresses in rice: the value of quantitative trait loci. In: Lamkey KR, Lee M, editors. Plant breeding: the Arnel R Hallauer International Symposium. Ames: Blackwell Publishing; 2006. p. 201–12.Google Scholar
- Mackill DJ, Coffman WR, Garrity DP. Rainfed lowland rice improvement. Los Banos, The Philippines: International Rice Research Institute; 1996.Google Scholar
- Manzanilla DO, Paris TR, Vergara GV, Ismail AM, Pandey S, Labios RV, Tatlonghari GT, Acda RD, Chi TTN, Duoangsila K, Siliphouthone I, Manikmas MOA, Mackill DJ. Submergence risks and farmers’ preferences: implications for breeding Sub1 rice in Southeast Asia 2010;(in press).Google Scholar
- Mohanty HK, Chaudhary RC. Breeding for submergence tolerance in rice in India. In: Progress in rainfed lowland rice. Manila:International Rice Research Institute, 1986;191–200.Google Scholar
- Mohanty HK, Suprihatno B, Khush GS, Coffman WR, Vergara BS. Inheritance of submergence tolerance in deepwater rice. Proceedings of the 1981 International Deepwater Rice Workshop. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines; 1982. p. 121–134.Google Scholar
- Sarkar RK, Reddy JN, Sharma SG, Ismail AM. Physiological basis of submergence tolerance in rice and implications for crop improvement. Curr Sci. 2006;91:899–906.Google Scholar
- Sarkar RK, Panda D, Reddy JN, Patnaik SSC, Mackill DJ, Ismail AM. Performance of submergence tolerant rice genotypes carrying the Sub1 QTL under stressed and non-stressed natural field conditions. Indian J Agric Sci. 2009;79:876–83.Google Scholar
- Septiningsih EM, Pamplona AM, Sanchez DL, Neeraja CN, Vergara GV, Heuer S Ismail AM, Mackill DJ. Development of submergence tolerant rice cultivars: the Sub1 locus and beyond. Ann Bot. 2009; 103:151–160.Google Scholar
- Singh N, Dang T, Vergara G, Pandey D, Sanchez D, Neeraja C, Septiningsih E, Mendioro M, Tecson-Mendoza R, Ismal A, Mackill D, Heuer S. Molecular marker survey and expression analyses of the rice submergence-tolerance genes SUB1A and SUB1C. Theor Appl Genet. 2010. doi:10.1007/s00122-010-1400-z.
- Suprihatno B, Coffman WR. Inheritance of submergence tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). SABRAO J. 1981;13:98–102.Google Scholar
- Vergara BS, Mazaredo A. Screening for resistance to submergence under greenhouse conditions. In Proceedings International Seminar on Deepwater Rice. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Bangladesh Rice Research Institute; 1975. p. 67–70.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.