Advertisement

Sports Engineering

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 389–399 | Cite as

An adaptive filtering algorithm to estimate sprint velocity using a single inertial sensor

  • Reed D. Gurchiek
  • Ryan S. McGinnis
  • Alan R. Needle
  • Jeffrey M. McBride
  • Herman van Werkhoven
Original Article

Abstract

The assessment of sprint velocity is useful for evaluating performance and guiding training interventions. In this paper, we describe an adaptive filtering algorithm to estimate sprint velocity using a single, sacrum-worn magneto-inertial measurement unit. Estimated instantaneous velocity, average 10 m interval velocity, and peak velocity during 40 m sprints from the proposed method were compared to a reference method using photocell position-time data. Concurrent validity of the proposed method was assessed using mean absolute error and mean absolute percent error for all velocity estimates. The significance of the mean error was assessed using a factorial ANOVA for average interval velocity and a paired-samples t test for peak velocity. Reliability was assessed using Bland–Altman 95% limits of agreement for repeated measures. Average interval velocity was underestimated early in the sprint (− 0.25 to − 0.05 m/s) and overestimated later (0.13 m/s) with mean absolute error between 0.20 m/s (3.95%) and 0.62 m/s (7.78%). The average mean absolute error was 0.45 m/s (7.02%) for instantaneous velocity and 0.63 m/s (7.84%) for peak velocity. The limits of agreement grew progressively wider at greater distances (− 0.59 to 0.34 m/s for 0–10 m and − 1.32 to 1.59 m/s for 30–40 m). The estimation error from the proposed method is comparable to other wearable sensor-based methods and suggests its potential use to assess sprint performance.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project was partially funded by the Appalachian State University Office of Student Research.

Supplementary material

12283_2018_285_MOESM1_ESM.docx (29 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 29 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Rabita G et al (2015) Sprint mechanics in world-class athletes: a new insight into the limits of human locomotion: sprint mechanics in elite athletes. Scand J Med Sci Sports 25(5):583–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Furusawa K, Hill AV, Parkinson JL (1927) The dynamics of ‘sprint’ running. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Contain Pap Biol Character 102(713):29–42Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Samozino P et al (2016) A simple method for measuring power, force, velocity properties, and mechanical effectiveness in sprint running: simple method to compute sprint mechanics. Scand J Med Sci Sports 26(6):648–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bezodis NE, Salo AIT, Trewartha G (2012) Measurement error in estimates of sprint velocity from a laser displacement measurement device. Int J Sports Med 33(6):439–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morin JB, Samozino P, Bonnefoy R, Edouard P, Belli A (2010) Direct measurement of power during one single sprint on treadmill. J Biomech 43(10):1970–1975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Waldron M, Worsfold P, Twist C, Lamb K (2011) Concurrent validity and test–retest reliability of a global positioning system (GPS) and timing gates to assess sprint performance variables. J Sports Sci 29(15):1613–1619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Petersen C, Pyne D, Portus M, Dawson B (2009) Validity and reliability of GPS units to monitor cricket-specific movement patterns. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 4(3):381–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Varley MC, Fairweather IH, Aughey RJ (Jan. 2012) Validity and reliability of GPS for measuring instantaneous velocity during acceleration, deceleration, and constant motion. J Sports Sci 30(2):121–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jennings D, Cormack S, Coutts AJ, Boyd L, Aughey RJ (2010) The validity and reliability of GPS units for measuring distance in team sport specific running patterns. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 5(3):328–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Romero-Franco N et al (2016) Sprint performance and mechanical outputs computed with an iPhone app: comparison with existing reference methods. Eur J Sport Sci 17:1–7Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Setuain I, Lecumberri P, Ahtiainen JP, Mero AA, Häkkinen K, Izquierdo M (2018) Sprint mechanics evaluation using inertial sensor-based technology: a laboratory validation study. Scand J Med Sci Sports 28(2):463–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Parrington L, Phillips E, Wong A, Finch M, Wain E, MacMahon C (2016) Validation of inertial measurement units for tracking 100 m sprint data. In: 34th Int. conf. biomech. sportGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Seco-Granados G, Lopez-Salcedo J, Jimenez-Banos D, Lopez-Risueno G (2012) Challenges in indoor global navigation satellite systems: unveiling its core features in signal processing. IEEE Signal Process Mag 29(2):108–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sabatini AM (2011) Estimating three-dimensional orientation of human body parts by inertial/magnetic sensing. Sensors 11(12):1489–1525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lidstone DE, Stewart JA, Gurchiek R, Needle AR, van Werkhoven H, McBride JM (2017) Physiological and biomechanical responses to prolonged heavy load carriage during level treadmill walking in females. J Appl Biomech 33(4):248–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McGinnis RS, Cain SM, Davidson SP, Vitali RV, Perkins NC, McLean SG (2016) Quantifying the effects of load carriage and fatigue under load on sacral kinematics during countermovement vertical jump with IMU-based method. Sports Eng 19(1):21–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McGinnis RS, Cain SM, Davidson SP, Vitali RV, McLean SG, Perkins NC (2015) Inertial sensor and cluster analysis for discriminating agility run technique. IFAC Pap 48(20):423–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McGinnis RS et al (2017) A machine learning approach for gait speed estimation using skin-mounted wearable sensors: from healthy controls to individuals with multiple sclerosis. PLoS One 12(6):e0178366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yang S, Mohr C, Li Q (2011) Ambulatory running speed estimation using an inertial sensor. Gait Posture 34(4):462–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bergamini E, Picerno P, Pillet H, Natta F, Thoreux P, Camomilla V (2012) Estimation of temporal parameters during sprint running using a trunk-mounted inertial measurement unit. J Biomech 45(6):1123–1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wixted AJ, Billing DC, James DA (2010) Validation of trunk mounted inertial sensors for analysing running biomechanics under field conditions, using synchronously collected foot contact data. Sports Eng 12(4):207–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bergamini E, Guillon P, Camomilla V, Pillet H, Skalli W, Cappozzo A (2013) Trunk inclination estimate during the sprint start using an inertial measurement unit: a validation study. J Appl Biomech 29(5):622–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gurchiek RD, McGinnis RS, Needle AR, McBride JM, van Werkhoven H (2017) The use of a single inertial sensor to estimate 3-dimensional ground reaction force during accelerative running tasks. J Biomech 61:263–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    de Vries WHK, Veeger HEJ, Baten CTM, van der Helm FCT (2009) Magnetic distortion in motion labs, implications for validating inertial magnetic sensors. Gait Posture 29(4):535–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Simon D (2006) Optimal state estimation. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Favre J, Jolles BM, Siegrist O, Aminian K (2006) Quaternion-based fusion of gyroscopes and accelerometers to improve 3D angle measurement. Electron Lett 42(11):612–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kuipers JB (1999) Quaternions and rotation sequences. Princeton University Press, PrincetonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hodges PW, Bui BH (1996) A comparison of computer-based methods for the determination of onset of muscle contraction using electromyography. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 101(6):511–519Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Martinez-Mendez R, Sekine M, Tamura T (2011) Detection of anticipatory postural adjustments prior to gait initiation using inertial wearable sensors. J Neuroeng Rehabil 8:17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nichols JA, Bednar MS, Havey RM, Murray WM (2016) Decoupling the wrist: a cadaveric experiment examining wrist kinematics following midcarpal fusion and scaphoid excision. J Appl Biomech 33:1–29Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Atkinson G, Nevill AM (1998) Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med 26(4):217–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Giavarina D (2015) Understanding Bland–Altman analysis. Biochem Med 25(2):141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Sports Engineering Association 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Appalachian State UniversityBooneUSA
  2. 2.University of VermontBurlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations