Monitoring seating interface pressure in wheelchair sports
A robust method of quantifying athlete movement and pressure distribution across the seating interface of wheelchair athletes is required for athlete monitoring, optimising athlete performance, and computational simulations. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether a pressure mat is capable of measuring the distribution of pressure during wheelchair sport motion, and analyse the relationship between an athlete’s pressure distribution and their movement at the seating interface. Pressure was measured at the seating interface (wheelchair racing, n = 6, wheelchair rugby, n = 2) under conditions of steady state (racing athletes only), acceleration from stationary (racing and rugby), and agility (rugby only). All athletes demonstrated large within-trial variation in average pressure, peak pressure, and contact area for the acceleration and agility (rugby only) trials, suggesting the change in requirements of the seating interface for wheelchair athletes across different motions. This research suggests the need for greater individualisation of athlete–wheelchair seating interfaces to promote performance, as well as the importance of including these seating interactions in biomechanical analyses of wheelchair propulsion. Regular monitoring of pressure distribution and sport specific demands will assist in wheelchair prescription and provide improved understanding of individual seat design requirements associated with specific athlete impairments.
KeywordsWheelchair racing Wheelchair rugby Pressure mat Pressure distribution Athlete–wheelchair interaction
The authors would like to thank the Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship for supporting the research, and the Australian Paralympic Committee for the use of the pressure mat in conducting this research. Additionally, the authors would like to thank Ms Keren Faulkner (Australian Paralympic Committee) and Mr Joseph Winter (Australian Institute of Sport) for their contributions.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 5.Boninger ML, Koontz AM, Sisto SA, Dyson-Hudson TA, Chang M, Price R, Cooper RA (2005) Pushrim biomechanics and injury prevention in spinal cord injury: recommendations based on CULP-SCI investigations. JRRD 42(3):9–19Google Scholar
- 11.Tweedy SM, Bourke J (2010) IPC Athletics Classification Project for Physical Impairments; Final Report—Stage 1. International Paralympic Committee Athletics. Bonn, Germany, pp 1–107Google Scholar
- 14.Mandy A, Redhead L, McCudden C, Michaelis J (2015) Position and movement of centre of force during propulsion of 3 different one arm drive wheelchairs by hemiplegic users. Phys Med Rehabil Int 2(3):1–7Google Scholar
- 21.Goosey-Tolfrey V (2010) Wheelchair sport: a complete guide for athletes, coaches, and teachers. Human Kinetics, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
- 24.Invacare (2015) Wheelchair Racing Measurement Guidelines. https://invacaretopend.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/202952225-Measurement-Tutorial-Step-by-Step. Accessed 9 Jan 2018
- 29.Gil-Agudo A, De la Peña-González A, Del Ama-Espinosa A, Pérez-Rizo E, Díaz-Domínguez E, Sánchez-Ramos A (2009) Comparative study of pressure distribution at the user-cushion interface with different cushions in a population with spinal cord injury. Clin Biomech (Bristol Avon) 24(7):558–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Ferrarin M, Andreoni G, Pedotti A (2000) Comparative biomechanical evaluation of different wheelchair seat cushions. JRRD 37(3):315–324Google Scholar
- 38.Loerakker S (2007) Aetiology of pressure ulcers. Eindhoven University of Technology, EindhovenGoogle Scholar
- 45.TekScan (2015) I-Scan Product Selection Guide. https://www.tekscan.com/resources/product-guide/i-scan-product-selection-guide. Accessed 7 July 2017