Sports Engineering

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 41–51 | Cite as

Chemical degradation of a paraffin wax-based binder used in granular composite sport surfaces

  • John W. Bridge
  • Kristofer S. Weisshaupt
  • Robert M. Fisher
  • Kaleb M. Dempsey
  • Michael L. Peterson
Original Article

Abstract

Chemical changes in high-oil wax-based binders used in Thoroughbred horse racing synthetic surfaces are studied over a 7-year period in an effort to understand the effect of changes in the binder on track behavior. A wax or polymer binder is used to hold the sand, fiber, and rubber constituents together in addition to creating a hydrophobic coating on the sand. The binder was extracted from bulk samples obtained from sampling of a racetrack surface at the same location on a single racetrack. During the 7 years, the material components of the track were not altered nor was material added, although normal maintenance including daily harrowing and annual tilling was performed. The binder was separated via solvent extraction from the samples. Differences in chemical composition were determined through oil extraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), gas chromatography (GC-FID), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Results show chemical changes in the binder resulting from oxidation of the oil in the wax, as well as changes in wax molecular structure. The goal of this work is to better understand how the binder changes over time to help guide maintenance and replacement decisions. Other potential changes to the surface materials can include the addition of oil stabilizers and binder replenishment. If the time interval between surface replacements can be extended, it would enable racetracks to provide a consistent and potentially safer racing surface at a lower cost.

Keywords

Paraffin wax Binder Degradation Synthetic Horse racetrack Granular composites 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the laboratory support given by Lab/Cor Materials in Seattle, Washington to include Elaine Vu-Phan who assisted with sample preparation and testing. Primary support for this work came from the non-profit Racing Surfaces Testing Laboratory in Orono, Maine which is supported by a coalition of Thoroughbred racing tracks and industry organizations.

References

  1. 1.
    Arthur RM (2010) Comparison of racing fatalities on dirt, synthetic, and turf at four California racetracks. In: Proceedings of the annual conv. of the AAEP, Baltimore, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blood-Horse Staff-March (2013) Equine fatal injury rate is steady in 2012. Horse racing news. http://www.bloodhorse.com. Accessed 6 June 2013
  3. 3.
    Finley B-Winter (2010) Ground control; the real truth about synthetic surfaces. Thoroughbred daily news magazine. http://thoroughbreddailynews.com. Accessed 21 Jan 2010
  4. 4.
    Peterson ML, McIlwraith CW (2008) Effect of track maintenance on mechanical properties of a dirt racetrack: a preliminary study. Equine Vet J 40(1):602–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Andersen S (2011) Hollywood Park: Jockeys refuse to ride last three races because of unsafe track conditions 11/20/2011 Daily Racing Form. http://www.drf.com/news/hollywood-park-jockeys-refuse-ride-last-three-races-because-unsafe-track-conditions. Accessed Feb 2016
  6. 6.
    Wolverhampton Express & Star (2013) Wolverhampton racecourse to get new track amid safety fears. http://www.expressandstar.com/news/2013/12/10/wolverhampton-racecourse-to-get-new-track-amid-safety-fears/. Accessed 6 Feb 2016
  7. 7.
    Luce S (2015) The jockey club releases year-over-year and six-year summary from equine injury database. http://jockeyclub.com/pdfs/eid_6_year_tables.pdf. Accessed 6 Feb 2016
  8. 8.
    Lamb K (2015) Pressure on woodbine to make right track decision, Toronto Star, thestar.com. http://www.thestar.com/sports/2015/03/08/pressure-on-woodbine-to-make-right-track-decision.html. Accessed 6 Feb 2016
  9. 9.
    Mitchell R, Angst R (2014) Keeneland to replace polytrack with dirt, blood horse. http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-racing/articles/84170/keeneland-to-replace-polytrack-with-dirt. Accessed 22 Mar 2016
  10. 10.
    Bridge JW, Peterson ML, Radford DW, McIlwraith CW (2009) Thermal transitions in high oil content petroleum-based wax blends used in granular sport surfaces, Thermochim. Acta J. 498:106–111Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Laboratory Test Data Files (2013), Racing Surfaces Laboratory, Orono, MEGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bridge JW, Fisher R, Lai T, Peterson ML (2014) Comparison of wax extraction methods used in synthetic granular composite sports surfaces. In: Processing and Properties of Advanced Ceramics and Composites VI, Ceramic Transactions, vol 249Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bridge JW, Mahaffey CA, Peterson ML (2014) Analytical test methods used to characterize granular composite sport surface materials. Appl Mech Mater J 440:74–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bardet JP, Sanchez J (2011) Soxhlet extraction determination of composition of synthetic soils. Geotech Testing J 34(3):5–6Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    ASTM Standard D3235 (2002) Standard test method for solvent extractables in petroleum waxes. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. ASTM International, USAGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    ASTM Standard D7414 (2009) Standard test method for condition monitoring oxidation in in-service petroleum and hydrocarbon based lubricants by trend analysis using fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrometry. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. ASTM International, USAGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    ASTM Standard D5442 (2008) Standard test method for analysis of petroleum waxes by gas chromatography. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. ASTM International, USAGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    ASTM Standard D4419 (2005) Standard test method for measurement of transition temperatures of petroleum waxes by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Annual Book of ASTM Standards. ASTM International, USAGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Geuskens G, David C (1979) The photo-oxidation of polymers, a comparison with low molecular weight compounds. Pure Appl Chem 51(2):233–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Scott G (1965) Atmospheric oxidation and antioxidants. Elsevier Publishing Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Migdal C (1998) The mechanism of antioxidant action in lubricants. In: Proceedings of 4th annual fuels and lubes Asia conferenceGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Edilashvili IL (1980) Oxidation of hydrocarbons of transformer oils. Petrol Chem USSR 20(4):212–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Andreev P, Bogomolov A, Dobryanskii A, Kartsev A (1968) Transformation of petroleum in nature. Int Ser Monogr Earth Sci 29:241–252Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wurzbach R (2000) Lubricant oxidation analysis and control. Mach Lubr. http://www.machinerylubrication.com/Read/14. Accessed Jan 2016
  25. 25.
    Scheirs J (2000) Compositional and failure analysis of polymers. Wiley, New York, pp 397–408Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    ASTM Standard D4767 (2002) Standard test method for consolidated undrained triaxial compression test for cohesive soils annual book of ASTM standards. ASTM International, USAGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hobbs SJ, Northrop AJ, Mahaffey C, Martin JH, Clayton HM, Murray R, Roepstorff L, Peterson ML (2014) Equine surfaces white paper, published by Fédération Equestre Internationale. http://www.fei.org/fei/about-fei/publications/fei-books. Accessed Mar 2016
  28. 28.
    Peterson ML, McIlwraith CW, Roepstorff L, Thomason JJ, Mahaffey C (2012) Racing surfaces white paper, racing surfaces committee of the welfare and safety of the racehorse summit, Published by The Jockey Club. http://www.grayson-jockeyclub.org/WelfareSafety/. Accessed Mar 2016

Copyright information

© International Sports Engineering Association 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • John W. Bridge
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Kristofer S. Weisshaupt
    • 2
  • Robert M. Fisher
    • 2
  • Kaleb M. Dempsey
    • 1
  • Michael L. Peterson
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering Program, School of STEMUniversity of WashingtonBothellUSA
  2. 2.Lab/Cor Materials LLCSeattleUSA
  3. 3.Racing Surfaces Testing LaboratoryOronoUSA
  4. 4.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of MaineOronoUSA

Personalised recommendations