Advertisement

Sports Engineering

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 171–181 | Cite as

Measurement of three-dimensional hand kinematics during swimming with a motion capture system: a feasibility study

  • Tony MonnetEmail author
  • Mathias Samson
  • Anthony Bernard
  • Laurent David
  • Patrick Lacouture
Technical Note

Abstract

Current trends in swimming biomechanics are focused on accurate measurements. Nowadays, reliable calibration methods have been proposed to reach an accuracy of about 1 mm on rigid structure. But the question remains about the final accuracy for three-dimensional hand kinematics measurement during the underwater phase of front crawl swimming. Furthermore, most research is based on manual tracking with two or more cameras. In this paper we propose a protocol to acquire three-dimensional hand kinematics when swimming in a specific pool with a motion analysis system behind windows. Results highlight the benefits of using such a system in terms of accuracy and feasibility: the time allowed for post-processing is ten times lower and the quantified improved accuracy is better than with manual tracking.

Keywords

Underwater 3D kinematics Optical motion analysis system Movement analysis Swimming Automatic tracking 

Notes

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest in connection with this manuscript submission and this research has no sources of funding.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (avi 6094 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Bartlett R (2005) Future trends in sports biomechanics—reducing injury risk or improving performance? In: Quing W (ed) 23rd International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports. Beijing, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gourgoulis V, Aggeloussis N, Kasimatis P, Vezos N, Boli A, Mavromatis G (2008) Reconstruction accuracy in underwater three-dimensional kinematic analysis. J Sci Med Sport 11:90–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yanai T, Hay J, Gerot J (1996) Three-dimensional videography of swimming with panning periscopes. J Biomech 29:673–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lauder M, Dabnichki P, Bartlett R (1998) Three-dimensional reconstruction accuracy within a calibrated volume. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Engineering of Sport. Blackwell Science, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dubois RP, Thiel DV, James DA (2012) Using image processing for biomechanics measures in swimming. Procedia Eng 34:807–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ceseracciu E, Sawacha Z, Fantozzi S, Cortesi M, Gatta G, Corazza S, Cobelli C (2011) Markerless analysis of front crawl swimming. J Biomech 44:2236–2242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    James DA, Burkett B, Thiel DV (2011) An unobtrusive swimming monitoring system for recreational and elite performance monitoring. Procedia Eng 13:113–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stamm A, James DA, Thiel DV (2013) Velocity profiling using inertial sensors for freestyle swimming. Sports Eng 16(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pease D (1999) Spotting technique faults—below & above the water. In: 17th International Conference on Biomechanics in Sport. Perth, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Silvatti A, Dias F, Cerveri P, Barros R (2012) Comparison of different camera calibration approaches for underwater applications. J Biomech 45:1112–1116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Silvatti A, Cerveri P, Telles T, Dias F, Baroni G, Barros R (2012) Quantitative underwater 3D motion analysis using submerged video cameras: accuracy analysis and trajectory reconstruction. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 16:1–9Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Samson M, Bernard A, David A (2012) Experimental and computational studies of the front crawl swimming, at the end of the entry-and-stretch phase. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 15(S1):224–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lauder M, Dabnichki P, Bartlett R, Aritan S (1996) The engineering of sport. In: Haake S (ed) The accuracy of kinematic data collected from underwater three-dimensional analysis. A A Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 303–312Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lauder M, Dabnichki P, Bartlett R (2001) Improved accuracy and reliability of sweepback angle, pitch angle and hand velocity calculations in swimming. J Biomech 34(1):31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Elipot M, Houel N, Hellard P, Dietrich G (2009) Reconstruction accuracy for visual calibration method. In: Harrison AJ, Anderson R, Kenny I (eds) 27th International Conference on Biomechanics in Sports. Limerick, Ireland.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ceccon S, Ceseracciu E, Sawacha Z, Gatta G, Cortesi M, Cobelli C, Fantozzi S (2012) Motion analysis of front crawl swimming applying cast technique by means of automatic tracking. J Sports Sci 31(3):276–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cappozzo A, Catani F, Leardini A (1995) Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: anatomical frame definition and determination. Clin Biomech 10(4):171–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schleihauf R (1979) A hydrodynamic analysis of swimming propulsion. Swimming III. University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 70–109Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Berger M, de Groot G, Hollander A (1995) Hydrodynamic drag and lift forces on human/arm models. J Biomech 28(2):125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Monnet T, Desailly E, Begon M, Vallée C, Lacouture P (2007) Comparison of the SCoRE and HA methods for locating in vivo the glenohumeral joint centre. J Biomech 40(15):3487–3492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ehrig RM, Heller MO, Kratzenstein S, Duda GN, Trepczynski A, Taylor WR (2011) The SCoRE residual: a quality index to assess the accuracy of joint estimations. J Biomech 44(7):1400–1404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chiari L, Della-Croce U, Leardini A, Cappozzo A (2005) Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry: Part 2: Instrumental errors. Gait Posture 21(2):197–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schleihauf R, Gray L, DeRose J (1983) Biomechanics and medicine in swimming. In: Hollander P, Huijing P, de Groot G (eds) Three-dimensional analysis of hand propulsion in the sprint front crawl stroke. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 173–183Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gourgoulis V, Aggeloussis N, Vezos N, Kasimatis P, Antoniou P, Mavromatis G (2008) Estimation of hand forces and propelling efficiency during front crawl swimming with hand paddles. J Biomech 41(1):208–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    de Leva P (1996) Joint center longitudinal positions computed from a selected subset of Chandler’s data. J Biomech 29(9):1231–1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cappozzo A, Catani F, Leardini A, Benedetti M, Della-Croce U (1996) Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: experimental artefacts. Clin Biomech 11(2):90–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Leardini A, Chiari L, Della-Croce U, Cappozzo A (2005) Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry: Part 3. Soft tissue artifact assessment and compensation. Gait Posture 21(2):212–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Della-Croce U, Camomilla V, Leardini A, Cappozzo A (2003) Femoral anatomical frame: assessment of various definitions. Med Eng Phys 25(5):425–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sanders R (1999) Hydrodynamic characteristics of a swimmer’s hand. J Appl Biomech 15:3–26Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Roosen A, Pain MTG, Thouz A, Monnet T, Begon M (2013) Segment-embedded frame definition affects the hip joint centre precision during walking. Med Eng Phys 35(8):1228–1234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Payton C, Bartlett R (1995) Estimating propulsive forces in swimming from three-dimensional kinematic data. J Sports Sci 13(6):447–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hay J, Liu Q, Andrews J (1993) The influence of body roll on hand path in freestyle swimming: a computer simulation study. J Appl Biomech 9:227–237Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Liu Q, Hay J, Andrews J (1993) Body roll and handpath in freestyle swimming: an experimental study. J Appl Biomech 9:238–253Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stagni R, Fantozzi S, Cappello A, Leardini A (2005) Quantification of soft tissue artefact in motion analysis by combining 3D fluoroscopy and stereophotogrammetry: a study on two subjects. Clin Biomech 20:320–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pain MTG, Challis JH (2006) The influence of soft tissue movement on ground reaction forces, joint torques and joint reaction forces in drop landings. J Biomech 39:119–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Camomilla V, Donati M, Stagni R, Cappozzo A (2009) Non-invasive assessment of superficial soft tissue local displacements during movement: a feasibility study. J Biomech 42:931–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Monnet T, Thouz M, Pain MTG, Begon M (2012) Assessment of reproducibility of thigh marker ranking during walking and landing tasks. Med Eng Phys 34:1200–1208CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Sports Engineering Association 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tony Monnet
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mathias Samson
    • 1
  • Anthony Bernard
    • 1
  • Laurent David
    • 1
  • Patrick Lacouture
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut Pprime, UPR 3346, CNRS Université de Poitiers-ENSMAFuturoscope CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations