Sports Engineering

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 221–226 | Cite as

Characterising the impact performance of field hockey sticks

  • Tom Allen
  • Leon Foster
  • Matt Carré
  • Simon Choppin
Short Communication

Abstract

Published research on field hockey equipment is scarce. The aim of this research was to investigate methods for characterising the impact performance of field hockey sticks. Three sticks were used with fundamental frequencies in the range 74–154 Hz. Striking an initially still ball with a stick was identified as the preferred method for characterising performance. Impacts were simulated at mean velocities of 19 m/s at toe and 16 m/s at the shaft. The mean apparent coefficient of restitution and standard deviation were −0.32 ± 0.05 at the toe and −0.18 ± 0.02 at the shaft. The foundation work presented here provides the foundations for developing a methodology for characterising the impact performance of field hockey sticks.

Keywords

Ball Dynamic Structural rigidity Velocity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Wasp Hockey for providing the hockey sticks, Mr Roger Webb for his advice, Mr Terry Senior for developing the impact rig, James Ibbotson for manually digitising the experimental results and Dr John Kelley and Mr Marcus Dunn for proof reading the manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    The International Hockey Federation (2011) The rules of hockey. Int Hockey Fed 1–64Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lees A (2002) Science and the major racket sports: a review. J Sports Sci 21:707–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Miller S (2006) Modern tennis rackets, balls and surfaces. Br J Sports Med 40:401–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nathan AM (2003) Characterizing the performance of baseball bats. Am Assoc Phys Teach 71(2):134–143MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nathan A, Crisco J, Greenwald R, Russell D, Smith L (2011) A comparative study of baseball bat performance. Sports Eng 13:153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gutaj F (2004) A comparison of methods for modelling the dynamics of a cricket bat. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 218(C12):1457–1468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bower R (2012) The sweet spot of a cricket bat for low speed impacts. Sports Eng 15:53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Monk SA, Davis CL, Otto SR, Strangwood M (2005) Material and surface effects on the spin and launch angle generated from a wedge/ball interaction in golf. Sports Eng 8:3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    ITF TECHNICAL DEPARTMENT (2010) International Tennis Federation [online]. Last accessed on 5 Jan 2009 at URL: www.itftennis.com/technical
  10. 10.
    Tanaka K, Matsuoka K, Fujita S, Teranishi Y, Ujihashi S (2012) Construction of a finite element model for collisions of a golf ball with a club during swing. Proc Inst Mech Eng P J Sports Eng Technol 226:96–106Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Allen T, Goodwill SR, Haake SJ (2009) Comparison of a finite element model of a tennis racket to experimental data. Sports Eng 12:87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Choppin S, Goodwill S, Haake S (2010) Investigations into the effect of grip on off-centre forehand strikes in tennis. Proc Inst Mech Eng P J 224:248–257Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goodwill SR (2002) The dynamics of tennis ball impacts on tennis rackets. PhD thesis, The University of SheffieldGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goodwill SR, Haake SJ (2001) Spring damper model of an impact between a tennis ball and racket. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 215(11):1331–1341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McHutchon M (2006). Design methodologies for sports equipment: a case study in hockey sticks, PhD thesis, University of SheffieldGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McHutchon MA, Curtis D, Carré MJ (2004) Parametric design of hockey sticks. In: Hubbard M, Mehta RD, Pallis JM (eds) The engineering of sport 5: proceedings of the 5th international conference on the engineering of sport, vol 1, pp. 284–290. ISEA, UKGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hatze H (1993) The relationship between the coefficient of restitution and energy losses in tennis racquets. J Appl Biomech 9:124–142Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kotze J, Mitchell SR, Rothberg SJ (2000) The role of the racket in high speed tennis serves. Sports Eng 3(2):67–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brody H (1985) The moment of inertia of a tennis racket. Phys Teacher 23:213–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Spurr J, Downing M (2007) Good vibrations: the effect of fundamental frequency on tennis. Tennis science and technology 3, 1, International Tennis Federation, London, 103–112Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Goodwill SR, Haake SJ (2004) Ball spin generation for oblique impacts with a tennis racket. Exp Mech 44(2):195–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wiart N, Kelley J, James D, Allen T (2011) Effect of temperature on the dynamic properties of soccer balls. Proc Inst Mech Eng P J Sports Eng Technol 225:189–198Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    FIH (2007) Performance requirements and test procedures for hockey balls. Int Hockey Fed 1–7Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Choppin S, Goodwill S, Haake S (2011) Impact characteristics of the ball and racket during play at the Wimbledon qualifying tournament. Sports Eng 13:163–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Sports Engineering Association 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tom Allen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Leon Foster
    • 1
  • Matt Carré
    • 3
  • Simon Choppin
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Sports Engineering ResearchSheffield Hallam UniversitySheffieldUK
  2. 2.Department of Engineering and MathsSheffield Hallam UniversitySheffieldUK
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations