Sports Engineering

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 95–104 | Cite as

Bowling ball dynamics revealed by miniature wireless MEMS inertial measurement unit

  • Kevin King
  • N. C. Perkins
  • Hugh Churchill
  • Ryan McGinnis
  • Ryan Doss
  • Ron Hickland
Original Article
First Online:

Abstract

This paper presents a novel sensor technology to deduce the dynamics of a bowling ball. The sensor, a miniature wireless inertial measurement unit (IMU), incorporates MEMS accelerometers and angular rate gyros, a microcontroller, a low power RF transceiver, and a rechargeable battery. When embedded in a bowling ball, the IMU transmits the acceleration and angular velocity data that define the dynamics of the ball starting with the bowler’s delivery and its motion in the lane. Example results from professional bowlers illustrate how this technology can be used to assess bowler skill and ball performance. For instance, the IMU accurately measures the spin dynamics of the ball which are crucial to develop the ball “hook.” An analysis of ball dynamics in the lane is distilled to a measurable “hook potential” metric for further assessing bowler skill. Finally, the sensor presented herein is believed to be the world’s smallest, wireless IMU. This highly miniaturized and wireless design will enable parallel training systems for many sports, including basketball, baseball, crew, cricket, golf, fly fishing, soccer, softball, tennis, rowing, among others.

Keywords

Tenpin bowling Sports training Dynamics Inertial Sensors 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the research support provided by Ebonite International and the earlier contributions of Mr. Darren Goldenberg to our project.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    (2010) reported statistics courtesy of the United State Bowling Congress, http://www.bowl.com/about/index.jsp#. Accessed 10 January 2010
  2. 2.
    Synge JL, Griffith BA (1949) Principles of mechanics. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 447–450Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kane TR (1961) Analytical elements of mechanics, vol 2. Academic Press, New York, pp 211–216Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hopkins DC, Patterson JD (1977) Bowling frames: paths of a bowling ball. Am J Phys 45(3):263–266Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huston RL, Passerello C, Winget JM, Sears J (1979) On the dynamics of a weighted bowling ball. ASME J Appl Mech 46:937–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Frohlich C (2004) What makes bowling balls hook? Am J Phys 72(9):1171–1177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zecchini E, Foutch GL (1991) The bowling ball’s path. Chemtech 21:731–735Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Walker J (1988) Why sidespin helps the bowler—and how to keep scoring strikes. Sci Am Amateur Sci 258:110–113Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cross R (1998) The trajectory of a ball in lawn bowls. Am J Phys 66(8):735–738Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brearley MN, Bolt BA (1958) The dynamics of a bowl. Q J Mech Appl Math 11:351–363MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brearley MN (1961) The motion of a biased bowl with perturbing projection conditions. Proc Cambridge Philos Soc 57:131–151MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chu DPK, Zhang B-M, Mau K (2002) Tenpin bowling technique on elite players. In: Proceedings of 2002 international conference on biomechanics in sports, pp 123–125Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fuss FK (2009) Design of an instrumented bowling ball and its application to performance analysis in tenpin bowling. Sports Technol. doi: 10.1002/jst.104
  14. 14.
    Song C (1997) Commercial vision of silicon based inertial sensors. Tech Dig 9th Intl Conf Solid State Sensors and Actuators 2:839–842Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yazdi N, Ayazi F, Najafi K (1998) Micromachined inertial sensors. Proc IEEE 86(8):1640–1659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barbour N, Schmidt G (2001) Inertial sensor technology trends. IEEE Sens J 1(4):332–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Savage PG (2002) Strapdown analytics. Strapdown Associates Inc, Maple PlaneGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rogers RM (2003) Applied mathematics in integration navigation systems. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VAGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Titterton DH, Weston JL (2004) Strapdown inertial navigation technology, 2nd edn. The Institution of Electrical Engineers, Stevenage UK and The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VAGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Perkins NC (2006) Electronic measurement of the motion of a moving body of sports equipment. US patent no. 7,021,140Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Perkins NC (2007) Electronic measurement of the motion of a moving body of sports equipment. US patent no. 7,234,351Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    King KW (2008) The design and application of wireless MEMS inertial measurement units for the measurement and analysis of golf swings. Dissertation, University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    King KW, Yoon SW, Perkins NC, Najafi K (2008) Wireless MEMS inertial sensor system for golf swing dynamics. Sens Actuators A Phys 141:619–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    King KW, Perkins NC (2008) Putting stroke analysis using wireless MEMS inertia sensor systems. In: Proceedings of the world scientific congress on golf V, Phoenix, AZ, USA, pp 270–278Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    King KW, Yoon SW, Perkins NC, Najafi K (2004) The dynamics of the golf swing as measured by strapdown inertial sensors. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on the engineering of sport, vol 2. Davis, CA, USA, pp 276–282Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Perkins NC, Richards B (2003) Dissecting the casting stroke: electronic measurements provide new insights. Fly Fisherman Magazine, December 2003:34–37, 66Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Anderson D, Perkins NC, Richards B (2006) Quantitative understanding of the fly casting stroke through measurements and robotic casting. J Sports Eng 9(2):97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ohgi Y, Ichikawa H, Miyaji (2002) Microcomputer-based acceleration sensor device for swimming stroke monitoring. JSME Int J Ser C 45:960–966Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Meamarbashi A (2009) A novel inertial technique to measure very high linear and rotational movements in sports, part I: the hardware. J Appl Sci 9(9):1741–1746Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hon TM, Senanyake ASMN, Flyger N (2009) Biomechanical analysis of 10-pin bowling using wireless inertial sensor. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics, Singapore, pp 1130–1135Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Sports Engineering Association 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin King
    • 1
  • N. C. Perkins
    • 1
  • Hugh Churchill
    • 1
  • Ryan McGinnis
    • 1
  • Ryan Doss
    • 1
  • Ron Hickland
    • 2
  1. 1.Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Ebonite InternationalHopkinsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations