Athlete and coach perceptions of technology needs for evaluating running performance
- 607 Downloads
Athletes and their support team utilise technology to measure and evaluate technique and athletic performance. Existing techniques for motion and propulsion measurement and analysis include a combination of indirect methods (high-speed video) and direct methods (force plates and pressure systems). These methods are predominantly limited to controlled laboratory environments (in a small area relative to the competition environment), require expert advice and support, and can take significant time to evaluate the data. Consequently, the more advanced measurement techniques are considered to be restricted to specific coaching sessions, or periods in the year leading up to competition, when the time and expertise of further support staff are available. The more widely used, and simple, devices for monitoring ‘performance’ during running include stopwatches, GPS tracking and accelerometer-based systems to count strides. These provide useful information on running duration, distance and velocity but lack detailed information on many key aspects of running technique. In order to begin the process of development of more innovative technologies for routine use by athletes and coaches, a study was required to improve the understanding of athletes’ and coaches’ perception of their requirements from measurement technology. This study outlines a systematic approach to elicit and evaluate their perceptions, and presents the findings from interviews and a questionnaire. The qualitative data are presented as a hierarchical graphical plot (structured relationship model) showing six general dimensions (technique, footwear and surface, environment, performance, injury and cardiovascular) and shows the development of these general dimensions from the interviewee quotations. The questionnaire quantitative data enhances the study by further ranking characteristics that arise from the interviews. A contrast is shown between short and longer distance runner groups, as might be expected. The current technology available to elite runners is briefly reviewed in relation to the 22 characteristics identified as important to measure. The conclusions highlight the need for newer technologies to measure aspects of running style and performance in a portable and integrated manner, with suggestions as to size and weight likely to be acceptable to users for emerging devices.
KeywordsPerceptions Instrumentation Gait analysis Running performance
The research team would like to thank the EPSRC and UK Sport for providing financial support for this one year feasibility project. Additionally, we would like to thank all of the coaches and athletes that gave their time. The opinions are solely those of the authors.
- 2.Cohen L, Manion L (1980) Research methods in education. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 6.Dixon SJ (2006) Application of centre of pressure data to indicate rearfoot inversion–eversion in shod running. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 96:305–312Google Scholar
- 8.Hay JG, Reid JG (1988) Anatomy, mechanics, and human motion, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
- 9.Heller B, Haake SJ, Kirtley C (2004) An instrumented insole for measurement of foot motion. In: Hubbard M (ed) The engineering of sport 5: proceedings of the 5th international conference on the engineering of sport, vol 2, pp 201–206. ISEA, Sheffield, UK, ISBN 0-9547861-2-2Google Scholar
- 10.Hocknell A, Jones R, Rothberg SJ (1996). Engineering ‘feel’ in the design of golf clubs. In: Haake SJ (ed) The engineering of sport: proceedings of the 1st international conference on the engineering of sport, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 333–337Google Scholar
- 11.Patton MQ (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 14.Scanlan TK, Ravizza K, Stein GL (1989) An in depth study of former elite figure skaters: I. Introduction to the project. J Sport Exerc Psychol 11:54–64Google Scholar
- 15.Scanlan TK, Stein GL, Ravizza K (1989) An in depth study of former elite figure skaters: II. Sources of enjoyment. J Sport Exerc Psychol 11:65–83Google Scholar