A new method for recording the temporal pattern of stride during treadmill running
- 108 Downloads
The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of a new infrared light based method (IR40) for recording temporal stride patterns during treadmill running. The IR40 device, emitting a tight web of 40 infrared light beams 10 mm above the treadmill running surface, was compared to a previously validated electro-pneumatic contact shoe (CS) method while nine well-trained athletes ran at 2.8, 3.3, 3.9, 4.4, 5.0, and 5.6 m s−1. Disconnection and reconnection of the IR beams marked the stance phase. The sampling rate was 500 Hz for both methods. The stance phase duration was on average 11.5 (±8.4) ms longer with the IR40 than with the CS depending on earlier touch down (8.3 ± 6.2 ms) and delayed toe off (3.2 ± 5.3 ms) registrations. Significantly different stance phases were recorded between all velocities and for both methods. Thus, despite the fact that the IR40 systematically measured a somewhat longer stance phase duration than CS, the IR40 is nonetheless useful for temporal stride analysis during treadmill running.
KeywordsInfrared radiation mat Contact shoe Stride analysis Treadmill
The study was supported by grants from the Swedish Centre for Sports Research (CIF), the Swedish Sports Confederation and the Swedish School of Sport and Health Science. The authors wish to thank the athletes who participated so kindly.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 3.Nigg BM, De Boer RW, Fisher V (1995) A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1:98–105Google Scholar
- 7.Marey EJ (1902) The history of chronophotography. Smithsonian Institute, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
- 8.Muybridge E (1878) The science of the horse’s motions. Sci Am 39:241Google Scholar
- 9.Elliot BC, Blanksby BA (1976) A cinematographic analysis of overground and treadmill running by males and females. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2:84–87Google Scholar
- 11.Luthanen P, Komi PV (1978) Mechanical factors influencing running speed. In: Asmussen E, Jörgenssen K (eds) Biomechanics VI B. University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 23–29Google Scholar
- 12.Williams KR, Cavanaugh PR (1987) Relationship between distance running mechanics, running economy and performance. J Appl Physiol 65:1236–1245Google Scholar
- 18.Kram R, Griffin TM, Donelan JM, Chang HY (1998) Force treadmill for measuring vertical and horizontal ground reaction forces. Eur J Appl Physiol 85:764–769Google Scholar
- 25.Viitasalo JT, Luthanen P, Mononen HV, Norvapalo K, Paavolainen L, Salonen M (1997) Photocell contact mat: a new instrument to measure contact and flight times in running. J Appl Biomech 14:254–268Google Scholar
- 26.Cavanagh PR, Kram R (1989) Stride length in distance running: velocity, body dimensions, and added mass effects. Med Sci Sports Exerc 4:467–479Google Scholar
- 31.Van Ingen Schenau GJ (1980) Some fundamental aspects of overground versus treadmill locomotion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 4:257–261Google Scholar
- 32.Basset DR, Giese JR, Nagle FJ, Ward A, Raab DM, Balke B (1985) Aerobic requirements of overground versus treadmill running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 4:477–481Google Scholar
- 33.Riley PO, Dicharry J, Franz J, Della Croce U, Wilder RP, Kerrigan DC (2008) A kinematics and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 6:1093–1100Google Scholar
- 34.Schache AG, Blanch PD, Rath DA, Wrigley TV, Starr R, Bennell KL (2001) A comparison of overground and treadmill running for measuring the three-dimensional kinematics of the lumbo–pelvic–hip complex. Clin Biochem 16:667–680Google Scholar
- 35.Savelberg HH, Vorstenbosch MA, Kamman EH, van de Veijer, Schambardt RC (1998) Intra-stride belt-variation affects treadmill locomotion. Gait Posture 1:26–34Google Scholar