Advertisement

Fat necrosis in level I oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery focusing on a modified round block technique

  • Hisamitsu ZahaEmail author
  • Tokiwa Motonari
  • Norie Abe
  • Mikiko Unesoko
Original Article

Abstract

The modified round block technique (MRBT) is a level I oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCS), which contains a very wide glandular flap created by extensive dual-plane undermining that is achieved by entire subcutaneous dissection and approximately 50% dissection of the breast parenchyma from the pectoralis muscle. A retrospective analysis was performed for 100 patients who underwent OBCS using MRBT from February 2009 to October 2017. The incidence of positive margin was 7.0% (seven cases), and there has been no local recurrence during a median follow-up period of 68 months. Short- and long-term complications included fat necrosis (11.0%), infection (4.0%), and hematoma formation (4.0%). When patients were divided into two groups based upon the preoperative mammography findings, fat necrosis occurred in 5.2% of the patients with extremely dense or heterogeneously dense mammography, and in 19.0% of patients with scattered fibroglandular or entire fat mammography, which showed a statistically significant difference. Therefore, in level I OBCS, the extent of dual-plane undermining should be minimized to less than 50% of the total parenchyma in fatty breasts.

Keywords

Breast-conserving surgery Oncoplastic surgery Modified round block technique Fat necrosis 

Notes

Funding

This study received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Hisamitsu Zaha declares that he/she has no conflict of interest. Tokiwa Motonari declares that he/she has no conflict of interest. Norie Abe declares that he/she has no conflict of interest. Mikiko Unesoko declares that he/she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Clough KB, Kaufman GJ, Nos C, Buccimazza I, Sarfati IM. Improving breast cancer surgery: a classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1375–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zaha H, Onomura M, Unesoko M. A new scarless oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery: modified round block technique. Breast. 2013;22:1184–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Würinger E, Mader N, Posch E, Holle J. Nerve and vessel supplying ligamentous suspension of the mammary gland. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101:1486–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mercado CL. BI-RADS update. Radiol Clin N A. 2014;52:481–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morimoto T, Okazaki M, Endo T. Current status and goals of mammographic screening for breast cancer in Japan. Breast Cancer. 2004;11:73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rao A, Saadeh PB. Defining fat necrosis in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:1202–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harris JR, Levene MB, Svensson G, Hellman S. Analysis of cosmetic results following primary radiation therapy for stages I and II carcinoma of the breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1979;5:257–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cordoso JS, Cardoso MJ. Towards an intelligent medical system for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment. Artif Intell Med. 2007;40:115–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, Harris JR, Khan SA, Horton J, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology–American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:704–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Morrow M, Van Zee KJ, Solin LJ, Houssami N, Chavez-MacGregor M, Harris JR, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology–American Society for Radiation Oncology–American Society of Clinical Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in ductal carcinoma in situ. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:3801–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dolan R, Patel M, Weiler-Mithoff E, Mansell J, Stallard S, Doughty JC, et al. Imaging results following oncoplastic and standard breast conserving surgery. Breast Care (Basel). 2015;10:325–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japanese Breast Cancer Society 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hisamitsu Zaha
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tokiwa Motonari
    • 1
  • Norie Abe
    • 1
  • Mikiko Unesoko
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Breast SurgeryNakagami HospitalOkinawa CityJapan

Personalised recommendations