Apocrine papillary lesion: comparison of pathological findings from 22 years previously and the present
- 20 Downloads
Apocrine papillary lesion (APL) is difficult to diagnose as benign or malignant. We experienced an APL remaining in the body for 22 years. We present a case of a 71-year-old woman who had undergone excisional biopsy 22 years previously at the first hospital that she visited. 1 year previously, she had undergone fine-needle aspiration cytology at a second hospital, and the lesion was diagnosed as potentially malignant. She underwent core-needle biopsy at a third hospital, but whether the lesion was benign or malignant could not be definitively diagnosed. We performed right mastectomy and sentinel lymph-node biopsy, because her tumor was suspected to be malignant based on imaging means, and malignancy could not be ruled out on either biopsy or cytology. The histopathological diagnosis was tiny foci of apocrine proliferative lesion with massive hemorrhagic necrosis and no tumor metastasis in two sentinel lymph nodes. Retrospectively, we compared all of the patient’s previous specimens with the present ones, and applied the recent pathological diagnostic criteria. Although the biopsy specimen excised 22 years ago suggested an encapsulated apocrine papillary carcinoma or a papilloma with apocrine ductal carcinoma in situ, neither infiltration nor metastasis has occurred. Furthermore, neither the pathological findings nor the clinical behavior has changed over time.
KeywordsApocrine papillary lesion Papilloma with DCIS Encapsulated apocrine papillary carcinoma
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
- 3.Ueng SH, Mezzetti T, Tavassoli FA. Papillary neoplasms of the breast: a review. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133(6):893–907.Google Scholar
- 4.O’Malley F, Visscher D, MacGrogan G, Tan PH, Ichihara S. Intraductal papilloma. In: Lakhani SR, Ellis IO, Schnitt SJ, Tan PH, van de Vijver MJ, editors. WHO classification of tumours of the breast. Lyon: IARC; 2012. pp. 100–5.Google Scholar
- 9.Maeda I, Oana Y, Tsugawa K, Takagi M. Availability of immunocytochemistry using cocktail antibody targeting p63/cytokeratin14 for the differential diagnosis of fibroadenoma and ductal carcinoma in situ in fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast. Cytopathology. 2017;28(5):378–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar