Validation study of the UICC TNM classification of malignant tumors, seventh edition, in breast cancer
- 524 Downloads
The TNM classification of the Unio Internationalis Contra Cancrum was revised for the seventh edition. The major change concerning breast cancer is a change in the stages for patients with T0 or T1N1miM0. In the present study, the seventh edition of the TNM classification was validated in breast cancer.
The stages of 416 breast cancer patients, treated at our hospital in 1996, were classified according to the TNM classification, sixth and seventh editions, and their prognoses were compared.
Case distribution using the sixth edition was stage 0, 56 cases (13.5 %); stage I, 158 cases (38.0 %); stage II, 130 [A, 102; B, 28] cases (31.2 [A, 24.5; B, 6.7] %); and stage III, 72 [A, 31; B, 8; C, 33] cases (17.3 [A, 7.5; B, 1.9; C, 7.9] %). According to the seventh edition, the stages for 20 patients, accounting for 19.6 % of IIA cases according to the sixth edition, decreased from IIA to IB. The 10-year overall survivals were stage 0, 91.1 %; stage I, 88.6 %; stage II, 80.8 %; and stage III, 63.9 % according to the sixth edition; and stage 0, 91.1 %; stage I, 88.8 %; stage II, 79.1 %; and stage III, 63.9 % according to the seventh edition. Although no significant differences were seen among the survival rates for stages 0 to II according to the sixth edition, there was a significant difference between stage I and II according to the seventh edition (p = 0.026).
The latest revision of the TNM classification is appropriate for breast cancer from the perspective of prognosis.
KeywordsBreast cancer TNM classification Micrometastasis Staging
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Greene FL. Breast tumours. In: Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C, editors. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 7th ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. p. 181–93.Google Scholar
- 2.Greene FL. Breast tumours. In: Sobin LH, Wittekind C, editors. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 6th ed. New York: Wiley; 2002. p. 131–141.Google Scholar
- 6.Reed J, Rosman M, Verbanac KM, Mannie A, Cheng Z, Tafra L. Prognostic implications of isolated tumor cells and micrometastases in sentinel nodes of patients with invasive breast cancer: 10-year analysis of patients enrolled in the prospective East Carolina University/Anne Arundel Medical Center Sentinel Node Multicenter Study. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:333–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Grabau D, Ryden L, Femö M, Ingvar C. Analysis of sentinel node biopsy—a single-institution experience supporting the use of serial sectioning and immunohistochemistry for detection of micrometastases by comparing four different histopathological laboratory protocols. Histopathology. 2011;59:129–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Rydén L, Chebil G, Sjöström L, Pawlowski R, Jönsson PE. Determination of sentinel lymph node (SLN) status in primary breast cancer by prospective use of immunohistochemistry increases the rate of micrometastases and isolated tumour cells: analysis of 174 patients after SLN biopsy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007;33:33–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar