Digital mammography in Japan
- 330 Downloads
Foreword
Digital mammography has been proposed as an alternative to screen-film mammography. Previous publications have reported the equivalent performance of digital and film mammography [1, 2], and digital mammography has some advantages over film mammography [3, 4],including many technical advantages, including image-enhancement capability, faster image acquisition, and better storage and transmission for archiving. Its full potential can only be achieved through soft-copy reading.
More than 70% of the facilities in Japan have digital mammography systems. However, most of the digital mammography systems use computed radiographic mammography and only about 10% of the facilities have full-field digital mammography systems. In addition, there are few facilities with soft-copy reading of digital mammography in Japan. This situation is remarkable, because most of the digital mammography systems worldwide are full-field digital mammography systems with soft-copy reading.
Because the soft-copy reading of digital mammography involves very complex processes, some issues have been raised. For the special articles in this issue, a group of recognized and experienced experts, based on the Mammography Subcommittee of the Japan Radiological Society, were assembled. These experts have put together a monograph on digital mammography. The special articles provide a comprehensive review and update on digital mammography, especially in Japan. They will serve as an excellent reference source for anyone interested in digital mammography.
References
- 1.Lewin LM, Hendrick RE, D’Orsi CJ, Isaacs PK, Moss LJ, Karellas A, et al. Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations. Radiology. 2001;218:873–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.Skaane P, Skjennald AS. Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program-the Oslo 2 study. Radiology. 2004;232:197–204.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum JK, Acharyya S, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1773–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Skaane P, Hofvind S, Skjennald AS. Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in a population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo 2 study. Radiology. 2007;244:708–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar