Bilateral breast MR imaging: is it superior to conventional methods for the detection of contralateral breast cancer?
- 127 Downloads
Breast MR imaging has emerged as a highly sensitive modality for the imaging of breast tumors. However, there have been no reports concerning the usefulness of bilateral breast MRI to evaluate the contralateral breast in Japan. The purpose of this study was to examine the frequency of primary bilateral breast cancer, and to investigate the role of bilateral breast MRI in the detection of contralateral breast cancer.
A retrospective review was performed of 556 consecutive women who had undergone surgery for the primary breast cancer. MR imaging was performed on a 1.5-T system. Both the breasts were examined in the coronal plane on the first-, second-, and fourth-phase dynamic images, acquired at 30, 90 s, and 4.5 min, respectively. The affected single breast was sagittally examined on images obtained in the third phase at 3 min.
Twenty-four (4.3%) patients had bilateral breast cancer, 14 (2.5%) had synchronous cancer and 10 patients (1.8%) had metachronous cancer. In the 14 cases with synchronous cancer, bilateral breast malignancy was suspected at the time of the initial diagnosis in 6 cases. The detection rate of 18 contralateral breast cancer cases by only MMG, only US, MMG and US, and MRI were 50% (9/18), 67% (12/18), 78% (14/18) and 100% (17/17), respectively. For 8 of these cases with a second synchronous cancer, the corresponding rates were 75, 88, 100 and 100%, respectively. For the 10 cases with a second metachronous cancer, the rates were 30, 50, 60 and 100%, respectively.
Bilateral breast MRI is a more sensitive for the detection of contralateral breast cancers compared with conventional imaging methods. In particular, bilateral MRI also allows detection of metachronous contralateral cancers at an earlier stage during the postoperative follow-up period.
KeywordsContralateral breast cancer MRI Bilateral imaging
- 6.Kasumi F. Bilateral breast cancer (in Japanese with English abstract). J Jpn Surg Soc. 1985;86:266–79. Google Scholar
- 7.Second edition of mammmography guideline, Japan Radiological Society/Japanese Society of Radiological Technology. Committee of mammography guideline/mammography committee editing; 2004.Google Scholar
- 8.Breast sonography guideline, Japan Association of breast and thyroid Sonology editing; 2004.Google Scholar
- 16.Sakamoto N, Tozaki M, Fukuma E, Higa K, Tsunoda Y, Abe S, Ogawa T, Ozaki S, Sakamoto M, Tsuruhara T, Narita M. The Role of Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy in the management of MRI-detected lesions (in Japanese with English abstract). Jpn J Breast Cancer. 2007;22:275–9.Google Scholar
- 20.Prat X, Sittek H, Baath L, Perlet C, Alberich T, Lamarque JM, Andersson I, Reiser M, Taourel P, Fischer H, Heywang-Kobrunner SH. European quadricentric evaluation of a breast MR biopsy and localization device: technical improvements based on phase-I evaluation. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1720–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Perlet C, Heinig A, Prat X, Casselman J, Baath L, Sittek H, Stets C, Lamarque J, Anderson I, Schneider P, Taourel P, Reiser M, Heywang-Kobrunner SH. Multicenter study for the evaluation of a dedicated biopsy device for MR-guided vacuum biopsy of the breast. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1463–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Sakota Y, Kohno N, Kanbara Y, Ishikawa Y, Sashikata T. A study of bilateral breast cancer (in Japanese with English abstract). J Jpn Surg Assoc. 1993;54:1439–44.Google Scholar
- 26.Oshiro T, Kataoka T, Kadoya T, Sugi K, Takahashi M, Haruta R, Asahara T, Dohi K. Clicicopathological study of primary breast cancer (in Japanese with English abstract). J Jpn Surg Assoc. 2000;61:11–6.Google Scholar