Journal of Microbiology

, Volume 53, Issue 7, pp 454–461 | Cite as

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity, root colonization, and soil alkaline phosphatase activity in response to maize-wheat rotation and no-tillage in North China

  • Junli Hu
  • Anna Yang
  • Anning Zhu
  • Junhua Wang
  • Jue Dai
  • Ming Hung Wong
  • Xiangui LinEmail author
Microbial Ecology and Environmental Microbiology


Monitoring the effects of no-tillage (NT) in comparison with conventional tillage (CT) on soil microbes could improve our understanding of soil biochemical processes and thus help us to develop sound management strategies. The objective of this study was to compare the species composition and ecological function of soil arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi during the growth and rotation of crops under NT and CT. From late June 2009 to early June 2010, 32 topsoil (0–15 cm) samples from four individual plots per treatment (CT and NT) were collected at both the jointing and maturation stages of maize (Zea mays L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) from a long-term experimental field that was established in an Aquic Inceptisol in North China in June 2006. The AM fungal spores were isolated and identified and then used to calculate species diversity indices, including the Shannon- Wiener index (H’), Evenness (E), and Simpson’s index (D). The root mycorrhizal colonization and soil alkaline phosphatase activity were also determined. A total of 34 species of AM fungi within nine genera were recorded. Compared with NT, CT negatively affected the soil AM fungal community at the maize sowing stage, leading to decreases in the average diversity indices (from 2.12, 0.79, and 0.82 to 1.79, 0.72, and 0.74 for H’, E, and D, respectively), root mycorrhizal colonization (from 28% to 20%), soil alkaline phosphatase activity (from 0.24 to 0.19 mg/g/24 h) and available phosphorus concentration (from 17.4 to 10.5 mg/kg) at the maize jointing stage. However, reductions in diversity indices of H’, E, and D were restored to 2.20, 0.81, and 0.84, respectively, at the maize maturation stage. CT should affect the community again at the wheat sowing stage; however, a similar restoration in the species diversity of AM fungi was completed before the wheat jointing stage, and the highest Jaccard index (0.800) for similarity in the species composition of soil AM fungi between CT and NT was recorded at the wheat maturation stage. Our results also demonstrated that NT resulted in the positive protection of the community structure of AM fungi and played an important role in maintaining their functionality especially for maize seedlings.


functionality jointing stage maturation stage restoration species richness spore density 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. álvaro-Fuentes J., Lopez M.V., Cantero-Martinez C., and Arrue J.L. 2008. Tillage effects on soil organic carbon fractions in Mediterranean dry land agroecosystems. Soil Sci Soc. Am. J. 72, 541–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvear M., Rosas A., Rouanet J.L., and Borie F. 2005. Effects of three soil tillage systems on some biological activities in an Ultisol from southern Chile. Soil Till. Res. 82, 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanco-Canqui H. and Lal R. 2008. No-tillage and soil-profile carbon sequestration: an on-farm assessment. Soil Sci Soc. Am. J. 72, 693–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Botta G.F., Becerra A.T., and Tourn F.B. 2009. Effect of the number of tractor passes on soil rut depth and compaction in two tillage regimes. Soil Till. Res. 103, 381–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Camron D.D. 2010. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as (agro)ecosystem engineers. Plant Soil 333, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castillo C.G., Rubio R., Rouanet J.L., and Borie F. 2006. Early effects of tillage and crop rotation on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal propagules in an Ultisol. Biol Fertil. Soils 42, 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Curaqueo G., Barea J.M., Acevedo E., Rubio R., Cornejo P., and Borie F. 2011. Effects of different tillage system on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal propagules and physical properties in a Mediterranean agroecosystem in central Chile. Soil Till. Res. 113, 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Giovannetti M. and Mosse B. 1980. An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New Phytol. 84, 489–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gosling P., Hodge A., Goodlass G., and Bending G.D. 2006. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and organic farming. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 113, 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. He J., Li H., Rasaily R.G., Wang Q., Cai G., Su Y., Qiao X., and Liu L. 2011. Soil properties and crop yields after 11 years of no tillage farming in wheat–maize cropping system in North China Plain. Soil Till. Res. 113, 48–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hepper C.M. 1984. Isolation and culture of VA mycorrhizal (VAM) fungi, pp. 95–112. In Powell, C.L. and Bagyaraj, D.J. (eds.), VA Mycorrhizae. CRC Press, Florida, USA.Google Scholar
  12. Hu J., Lin X., Wang J., Chu H., Yin R., and Zhang J. 2009. Population size and specific potential of P-mineralizing and -solubilizing bacteria under long-term P-deficiency fertilization in a sandy loam soil. Pedobiologia 53, 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. IUSS. 2006. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2006. World Soil Resources Report no. 103. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
  14. Jackson M.L. 1958. Soil chemical analysis, pp. 111–133. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
  15. Jansa J., Mozafar A., Kuhn G., Anken T., Ruh R., Sanders I.R., and Frossard E. 2003. Soil tillage affects the community structure of mycorrhizal fungi in maize roots. Ecol. Appl. 13, 1164–1176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Krüger M., Krüger C., Walker C., Stockinger H., and Schüßler A. 2012. Phylogenetic reference data for systematics and phylotaxonomy of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from phylum to species level. New Phytol. 193, 970–984.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Martinez T.N. and Johnson N.C. 2010. Agricultural management influences propagule densities and functioning of arbuscular mycorrhizas in low-and high-input agroecosystems in arid environments. Appl. Soil Ecol. 46, 300–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mirás-Avalos J.M., Antunes P.M., Koch A., Khosla K., Klironomos J.N., and Dunfield K.E. 2011. The influence of tillage on the structure of rhizosphere and root-associated arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. Pedobiologia 54, 235–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mosaddeghi M.R., Mahboubi A.A., and Safadoust A. 2009. Shortterm effects of tillage and manure on some soil physical properties and maize root growth in a sandy loam soil in western Iran. Soil Till. Res. 104, 173–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Muñoz-Romero V., Benítez-Vega J., López-Bellido R.J., Fontán, J.M., and López-Bellido L. 2010. Effect of tillage system on the root growth of spring wheat. Plant Soil 326, 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oehl F., Laczko E., Bogenrieder A., Stahr K., Bösch R., van der Heijden M., and Sieverding E. 2010. Soil type and land use intensity determine the composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42, 724–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Oehl F., Sieverding E., Palenzuela J., Ineichen K., and Alves da Silva G. 2011. Advances in Glomeromycota taxonomy and classification. IMA Fungus 2, 191–199.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Olsen S.R., Cole C.V., Watanabe F.S., and Dean L.A. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate, Circular 939, p.19. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., USA.Google Scholar
  24. Phillips J.M. and Hayman D.S. 1970. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 55, 158–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Qin S., He X., Hu C., Zhang Y., and Dong W. 2010. Responses of soil chemical and microbial indicators to conservational tillage versus traditional tillage in the North China Plain. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 46, 243–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schüßler A. and Walker C. 2010. The Glomeromycota: a species list with new families and genera. Libraries at The Royal Botanical Garden Edinburgh, The Royal Botanic Garden Kew, Botanische Staatssammlung Munich, and Oregon State University.Google Scholar
  27. Smith S.E. and Read D.J. 2008. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis, 3rd edn. Academic Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
  28. Sun X., Gao C., and Guo L.D. 2013. Changes in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus community along an exotic plant Eupatorium adenophorum invasion in a Chinese secondary forest. J. Microbiol. 51, 295–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tabaglio V., Gavazzi C., and Menta C. 2009. Physico-chemical indicators and microarthropod communities as influenced by no-till, conventional tillage and nitrogen fertilisation after four years of continuous maize. Soil Till. Res. 105, 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tabatabai M.A. 1982. Soil enzymes. In Page, A.L., Miller, R.H., and Keeney, D.R. (eds.), Methods of Soil Analyses, Part 2, Chemical and Microbiological Properties, 2nd edn., pp. 903–947. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
  31. Wang F.Y., Hu J.L., Lin X.G., Qin S.W., and Wang J.H. 2011. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community structure and diversity in response to long-term fertilization: a field case from China. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 27, 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yang S.K., Kim M.K., Seo Y.W., Choi K.J., Lee S.T., Kwak Y.S., and Lee Y.H. 2012. Soil microbial community analysis of between no-till and tillage in a controlled horticultural field. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 28, 1797–1801.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yang A.N., Lu L., and Zhang N. 2011. The diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the subtropical forest of Huangshan (Yellow Mountain), East-Central China. World J. Microb. Biotechnol. 27, 2351–2358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhu Y., Smith F.A., and Smith S.E. 2003. Phosphorus efficiencies and responses of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi grown in highly calcareous soil. Mycorrhiza 13, 93–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Microbiological Society of Korea and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Junli Hu
    • 1
    • 3
  • Anna Yang
    • 2
  • Anning Zhu
    • 1
  • Junhua Wang
    • 1
    • 3
  • Jue Dai
    • 1
    • 3
  • Ming Hung Wong
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  • Xiangui Lin
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil ScienceChinese Academy of SciencesNanjingP. R. China
  2. 2.Provincial Key Laboratory of Biotic Environment and Ecological Security in AnhuiCollege of Life Sciences, Anhui Normal UniversityWuhuP. R. China
  3. 3.Joint Open Laboratory of Soil and the Environment, Hong Kong Baptist University and Institute of Soil ScienceChinese Academy of SciencesNanjingP. R. China
  4. 4.Croucher Institute for Environmental SciencesDepartment of Biology, Hong Kong Baptist UniversityKowloon Tong, Hong Kong SARP. R. China
  5. 5.Consortium on Health, Environment, Education and Research, Department of Science and Environmental StudiesThe Hong Kong Institute of EducationTai Po, Hong Kong SARP. R. China

Personalised recommendations