Biological control and plant growth promoting capacity of rhizobacteria on pepper under greenhouse and field conditions
- 753 Downloads
- 15 Citations
Abstract
Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria Ochrobactrum lupini KUDC1013 and Novosphingobium pentaromativorans KUDC1065 isolated from Dokdo Island, S. Korea are capable of eliciting induced systemic resistance (ISR) in pepper against bacterial spot disease. The present study aimed to determine whether plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) strains including strain KUDC1013, strain KUDC1065, and Paenibacillus polymyxa E681 either singly or in combinations were evaluated to have the capacity for potential biological control and plant growth promotion effect in the field trials. Under greenhouse conditions, the induced systemic resistance (ISR) effect of treatment with strains KUDC1013 and KUDC1065 differed according to pepper growth stages. Drenching of 3-week-old pepper seedlings with the KUDC-1013 strain significantly reduced the disease symptoms. In contrast, treatment with the KUDC1065 strain significantly protected 5-week-old pepper seedlings. Under field conditions, peppers treated with PGPR mixtures containing E681 and KUDC1013, either in a two-way combination, were showed greater effect on plant growth than those treated with an individual treatment. Collectively, the application of mixtures of PGPR strains on pepper might be considered as a potential biological control under greenhouse and field conditions.
Keywords
Dokdo Island biological control induced systemic resistance (ISR) plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) pepper (Capsicum annuum)Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Arora, N.K., Kang, S.C., and Maheshwari., D.K. 2001. Isolation of siderophore-producing strains of Rhizobium meliloti and their biocontrol potential against Macrophomina phaseolina that causes charcoal rot of groundnut. Curr. Sci. 81, 673–677.Google Scholar
- Ashrafuzzaman, M., Hossen, F.A., Ismail, M.R., Hoque, M.A., Islam, M.Z., and Meon, S. 2009. Efficiency of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) for the enhancement of rice growth. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 8, 1247–1252.Google Scholar
- Chung, E., Ryu, C.M., Oh, S.K., Kim, R.N., Park, J.M., Cho, H.S., Lee, S., Moon, J.S., Park, S.H., and Choi, D.I. 2006. Suppression of pepper SGT1 and SKP1 causes severe retardation of plant growth and compromises basal resistance. Physiol. Plant 126, 605–617.Google Scholar
- Frey-Klett, P., Chavatte, M., Clausse, M.L., Courrier, S., Roux, C.L., Raaijmakers, J., Martinotti, M.G., Pierrat, J.C., and Garbaye, J. 2005. Ectomycorrhizal symbiosis affects functional diversity of rhizosphere fluorescent pseudomonads. New Phytol. 165, 317–328.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gholami, A., Shahsavain, S., and Nezarat, S. 2009. Screening plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for improving seed germination, seedling growth and yield of maize. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 12, 26–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Glick, B.R. and Bashan, Y. 1997. Genetic manipulation of plant growth-promoting bacteria to enhance biocontrol of phytopathogens. Biotechnol. Adv. 15, 353–378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ham, M.S., Park, Y.M., Sung, H.R., Sumayo, M., Ryu, C.M., Park, S.H., and Ghim, S.-Y. 2009. Characterization of rhizobacteria isolated from family Solanaceae plants in Dokdo Island. Kor. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 37, 110–117.Google Scholar
- Hameeda, B., Harini, G., Rupela, O.P., Wani, S.P., and Reddy, G. 2006. Growth promotion of maize by phosphate-solubilizing bacteria isolated from composts and macrofauna. Microbiol. Res. 163, 234–242.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hwang, B.K. and Kim, C.H. 1995. Phytophthora blight of pepper and its control in Korea. Plant Dis. 79, 221–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- ISTA. 1993. Proceedings of the International Seed Testing Association, International rules for seed testing. Seed Sci. Technol. 21, 25–30.Google Scholar
- Jetiyanon, K. and Kloepper, J.W. 2002. Mixtures of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for induction of systemic resistance against multiple plant diseases. Biol. Control 24, 285–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jetiyanon, K., Flowler, W.D., and Kloepper, J.W. 2003. Broad-spectrum protection against several pathogens by PGPR mixtures under field conditions in Thailand. Plant Dis. 87, 1390–1394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jetiyanon, K. 2007. Defensive-related enzyme response in plants treated with a mixture of Bacillus strains (IN937a and IN937b) against different pathogens. Biol. Control 42, 178–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kloepper, J.W., Lifshitz, R., and Zablotowicz, R.M. 1989. Free-living bacterial inocula for enhancing crop productivity. Trends Biotechnol. 7, 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kloepper, J.W., Scher, F.M., Laliberte, M., and Tipping, B. 1986. Emergence-promoting rhizobacteria: Description and implications for agriculture. Iron, Siderophores, and Plant Disease, In Swinburne, T.R. (ed.), pp. 155–164. Plenum Publishing Corp., New York, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lee, H.J., Park, K.H., Shim, J.H., Park, R.D., Kim, Y.W., Cho, J.Y., Hwangbo, H., Kim, Y.C., Cha, G.S., Krishnan, H.B., and Kim, K.Y. 2005a. Quantitative changes of plant defense enzymes in biocontrol of pepper (Capsicium annuum L.) late blight by antagonistic Bacillus subtilis HJ927. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 15, 1073–1079.Google Scholar
- Lee, S.E., Yi, H.S., Park, S.H., and Ghim, S.-Y. 2005b. Characterization of a rhizobacterium promoting early growth in maize. Kor. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 33, 70–73.Google Scholar
- Lee, S.J., Lee, S.E., Seul, K.J., Park, S.H., and Ghim, S.-Y. 2006. Plant growth-promoting capabilities of diazotrophs from wild gramineous crops. Kor. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 34, 78–82.Google Scholar
- Mathre, D.E. and Johnston, R.H. 1995. Combined biological and chemical seed treatments for control of two seedling diseases of Sh2 sweet corn. Plant Dis. 79, 1145–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Murphy, J.F., Reddy, M.S., Ryu, C.M., Klopper, J.W., and Li, R. 2003. Rhizobacteria-mediated growth promotion of tomato leads to protection against Cucumber mosaic virus. Virology 10, 1301–1307.Google Scholar
- Park, C.S., Paulitz, T.C., and Baker, R. 1988. Biocontrol of Fusarium wilt of cucumber resulting from interactions between Pseudomonas putida and nonpathogenic isolates of Fusarium oxysporum. Phytopathology 78, 190–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pierson, E.A. and Weller, D.M. 1994. Use of mixtures of fluorescent pseudomonads to suppress take-all and improve the growth of wheat. Phytopathology 84, 940–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ramamoorthy, V., Viswanathan, R., Raguchander, T., Prakasam, V., and Samiyappan, R. 2001. Induction of systemic resistance by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in crop plants against pests and diseases. Crop Protection 20, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Raupach, G.S. and Kloepper, J.W. 1998. Mixtures of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria enhance biological control of multiple cucumber pathogens. Phytopathology 88, 1158–1164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Raupach, G.S. and Kloepper, J.W. 2000. Biocontrol of cucumber diseases in the field by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria with and without methyl bromide fumigation. Plant Dis. 84, 1073–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ryu, C.M., Farag, M.A., Hu, C.H., Reddy, M.S., Wei, H.-X., Paré, P.W., and Kloepper, J.W. 2003a. Bacterial volatiles promote growth in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 4927–4932.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ryu, C.M., Hu, C.H., Reddy, M.S., and Kloepper, J.W. 2003b. Different signaling pathways of induced resistance by rhizobacteria in Arabidopsis thaliana against two pathovars of Pseudomonas syringae. New Phytol. 160, 413–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ryu, C.M., Farag, M.A., Hu, C.H., Reddy, M.S., Wei, H.-X., Kloepper, J.W., and Paré, P.W. 2004. Bacterial volatiles induce systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 134, 1017–1026.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ryu, C.M., Farag, M.A., Paré, P.W., and Kloepper, J.W. 2005. Invisible signals from the underground: Bacterial volatiles elicit plant growth promotion and induce systemic resistance. Plant Pathol. J. 21, 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ryu, C.M., Kim, J.W., Choi, O.H., Kim, S.H., and Park, C.S. 2006. Improvement of biological control capacity of Paenibacillus polymyxa E681 by seed pelleting on sesame. Biol. Control 39, 282–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ryu, C.M., Murphy, J.F., Reddy, M.S., and Kloepper, J.W. 2007. A two-strain mixture of rhizobacteria elicits induction of systemic resistance against Pseudomonas syringae and Cucumber mosaic virus coupled to promotion of plant growth on Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 17, 280–286.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sang, M.K., Chun, S.-C., and Kim, K.D. 2008. Biological control of Phytophthora blight of pepper by antagonistic rhizobacteria selected from a sequential screening procedure. Biol. Control 46, 424–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Silva, H.S.A., Romeiro, R.S., Filho, R.C., Pereira, J.L.A., Mizubuti, E.S.G., and Mounteer, A. 2004. Induction of systemic resistance by Bacillus cereus against tomato foliar diseases under field conditions. J. Phytopathol. 152, 371–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vikaram, A. 2007. Efficacy of phosphate solubilizing bacteria isolated from vertisols on growth and yield parameters of sorghum. Res. J. Microbiol. 2, 550–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wei, G., Kloepper, J.W., and Tuzun, S. 1996. Induced systemic resistance to cucumber diseases and increased plant growth by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria under field conditions. Phytopathology 86, 221–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar