Advertisement

Paenibacillus telluris sp. nov., a novel phosphate-solubilizing bacterium isolated from soil

  • Jae-Chan Lee
  • Chang-Jin Kim
  • Ki-Hong YoonEmail author
Articles

Abstract

A phosphate-solubilizing bacterial strain designated PS38T was isolated from farm soil. The isolate was a Gram-positive, motile, endospore-forming, rod-shaped bacterium. It grew optimally at 37°C and pH 7.5. The predominant cellular fatty acids were anteiso-C15:0, anteiso-C17:0, and iso-C16:0. The DNA G+C content was 49.5 mol% and the predominant menaquinone was MK-7. Phylogenese analyses based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that the strain PS38T belonged to the genus Paenibacillus and was most closely related to Paenibacillus chibensis JCM 9905T, P. barengoltzii SAFN-016T, P. timonensis 2301032T, and P. motobuensis MC10T with 96.3%, 96.0%, 95.9%, and 95.5% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity, respectively. On the basis of morphological, chemotaxonomic, physiological, and phylogenetic properties, strain PS38T represents a novel species of the genus Paenibacillus, for which the name Paenibacillus telluris sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is PS38T (=KCTC 13946T =CGMCC 1.10695T).

Keywords

Paenibacillus telluris sp. nov. taxonomy Gram-positive 

References

  1. Ash, C., F.G. Priest, and M.D. Collins. 1993. Molecular identification of rRNA group 3 bacilli (Ash, Farrow, Wallbanks and Collins) using a PCR probe test. Proposal for the creation of a new genus Paenibacillus. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 64, 253–260.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ash, C., F.G. Priest, and M.D. Collins. 1994. Paenibacillus gen. nov. In validation of the publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSB. List no. 51. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 44, 852–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chun, J., J.H. Lee, Y. Jung, M. Kim, S. Kim, B.K. Kim, and Y.W. Lim. 2007. EzTaxon: a web-based tool for the identification of prokaryotes based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 57, 2259–2261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cowan, S.T. and K.J. Steel. 1965. Manual for the Identification of Medical Bacteria. Cambridge University Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
  5. DeLong, E.F. 1992. Archaea in coastal marine environments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 5685–5689.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Felsenstein, J. 2005. PHYLIP Phylogeny Inference Package, version 3.65. Distributed by the author. Department of Genomic Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.Google Scholar
  7. Goldstein, A.H. 1986. Bacterial solubilization of mineral phosphates: historical perspectives and future prospects. Am. J. Altern. Agricult. 1, 57–65.Google Scholar
  8. Kimura, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16, 111–120.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Komagata, K. and K. Suzuki. 1987. Lipid and cell-wall analysis in bacterial systematics. Methods Microbiol. 19, 161–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lanyi, B. 1987. Classical and rapid identification methods for medically important bacteria. Methods Microbiol. 19, 1–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lee, J.C. and K.H. Yoon. 2008. Paenibacillus woosongensis sp. nov., a xylanolytic bacterium isolated from forest soil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 58, 612–616.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nautiyal, C.S., S. Bhadauria, P. Kumar, H. Lal, and M.D. Verma. 2000. Stress induced phosphate solubilization in bacteria isolated from alkaline soils, FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 182, 291–296.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Peix, A., A.A. Rivas-Boyero, P.F. Mateos, C. Rodriguez-Barrueco, E. Martinez-Molina, and E. Velazquez. 2001. Growth promotion of chickpea and barley by a phosphate solubilizing strain of Mesorhizobium mediterraneum under growth chamber conditions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33, 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sasser, M. 1990. Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. MIDI Technical Note 101. MIDI Inc., Newark, DE, USA.Google Scholar
  15. Smibert, R.M. and N.R. Krieg. 1981. General characterization. Manual of Methods for General Bacteriology, pp. 409–443. In P. Gerhardt, R.G.E. Murray, R.N. Costilow, E.W. Nestor, W.A. Wood, N.R. Krieg, and G.B. Phillips (ed). American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  16. Smibert, R.M. and N.R. Krieg. 1994. Phenotypic characterization. Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology, pp. 607–654. In P. Gerhardt (ed). American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  17. Stackebrandt, E. and B.M. Goebel. 1994. Taxonomic note: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 44, 846–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Thompson, J.D., D.G. Higgins, and T.J. Gibson. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673–4680.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tomaoka, J. and K. Komagata. 1984. Determination of DNA base composition by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 25, 125–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Microbiological Society of Korea and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg  2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and BiotechnologyDaejeonRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Food Science & BiotechnologyWoosong UniversityDaejeonRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations