Genome-wide transcriptional responses to sulfite in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Sulfite is a commonly used preservative in foods, beverages, and Pharmaceuticals because it is toxic to many microorganisms. In order to understand the global response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to sulfite, genome-wide transcript profiling following sulfite exposure was obtained. The transcription levels of 21 genes were increased more than 2-fold, while those of 37 genes decreased to a similar extent. Genes involved in carbohydrate metabolism represented the highest proportion of induced genes, which may account for the easily acquired resistance to sulfite. Most of down-regulated genes are involved in transcription, protein biosynthesis, and cell growth. The down-regulation of these genes is thought to reflect growth arrest which occurs during sulfite treatment, allowing cells to save energy. Cells treated with sulfite generated more than 70% of acetaldehyde than untreated cells, suggesting that the increased acetaldehyde production is correlated with the induction of PDC1 gene encoding pyruvate decarboxylase.
KeywordsDNA microarray gene expression sulfite yeast
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Boulton, R.B. and V.L. Singleton. 1995. The role of sulfur dioxide in wine, p. 448–437. In L.F. Bisson and R.E. Kunkee (eds.), Principles and practices of wine making. Chapman and Hall, New York, N.Y., USA.Google Scholar
- Ough, C.S. 1993. Sulfur dioxide and sulfites, p. 137–190. In P.M. Davidson and A.L. Branen (eds.), Antimicrobials in Foods. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, N.Y., USA.Google Scholar
- Pilkington, B.J. and A.H. Rose. 1988. Reactions of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Zygosaccharomyces bailli to sulphite. J. Gen. Bacteriol. 134, 2823–2830.Google Scholar
- Prakash, D., H. Hinze, and H. Holzer. 1986. Synergistic effect of m-chloro-peroxybenzoic acid, sulfite and nitrite on the energy metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 34, 305–308.Google Scholar