Influence of metal support in-plane symmetry on the corrugation of hexagonal boron nitride and graphene monolayers
- 160 Downloads
Predicting the properties of two-dimensional (2D) materials as graphene and hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) monolayers after their growth on any given substrate is a major challenge. While the influence of the electron configuration of the atoms of the underlying surface is well-understood, the effect of substrate geometry still remains unclear. The structural properties of h-BN monolayers grown on a rectangularly packed Rh(110) surface were characterized in situ by ultrahigh vacuum scanning tunneling microscopy and were compared to those that this material exhibits when grown on substrates showing different crystallographic orientations. Although the h-BN monolayer grown on Rh(110) was dominated by a unique quasiunidimensional moiré pattern, suggesting considerable interface interaction, the moiré corrugation was unexpectedly smaller than those reported for strongly interacting interfaces with hexagonal-terminated substrates, owing to differences in the possible binding landscapes at interfaces with differently oriented substrates. Moreover, a rule was derived for predicting how interface corrugation and the existence and extent of subregions within moiré supercells containing favorable sites for orbital mixing between h-BN monolayers and their supports depend on substrate symmetry. These general symmetry considerations can be applied to numerous 2D materials, including graphene, thereby enabling the prediction of how substrate choice determines the properties of these materials. Furthermore, they could also provide new routes for tuning 2D material properties and for developing nanotemplates showing different geometries for growing adsorbate superlattices.
Keywordshexagonal boron nitride graphene 2-dimensional materials scanning tunneling microscopy moiré superstructures nanotemplates
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Authors acknowledge financial support from AEI and FEDER under project MAT2016-77852-C2-2-R (AEI/FEDER, UE). A.J.M.-G. acknowledges funding from the Spanish MINECO through the Juan de la Cierva program (ref. IJCI-2014-19209).
- Oshima, C.; Nagashima, A. Ultra-thin epitaxial films of graphite and hexagonal boron nitride on solid surfaces. J. Phys.: Condes. Matter 1997, 9, 1.Google Scholar
- Martín-Recio, A.; Romero-Muñiz, C.; Martínez Galera, A. J.; Pou, P.; Pérez, R.; Gómez-Rodríguez, J. M. Tug-of-war between corrugation and binding energy: Revealing the formation of multiple moiré patterns on a strongly interacting graphene-metal system. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 11300–11309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- González-Herrero, H.; Pou, P.; Lobo-Checa, J.; Fernández-Torre, D.; Craes, F.; Martínez-Galera, A. J.; Ugeda, M. M.; Corso, M.; Enrique Ortega, J.; Gómez-Rodríguez, J. M. et al. Graphene tunable transparency to tunneling electrons: A direct tool to measure the local coupling. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 5131–5144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Preobrajenski, A. B.; Vinogradov, A. S.; Ng, M. L.; Cavar, E.; Westerström, R.; Mikkelsen, A.; Lundgren, E.; Mårtensson, N. Influence of chemical interaction at the lattice-mismatched h-BN/Rh(111) and h-BN/Pt(111) interfaces on the overlayer morphology. Phys. Rev. B 2007, 75, 245412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cavallin, A.; Pozzo, M.; Africh, C.; Baraldi, A.; Vesselli, E.; Dri, C.; Comelli, G.; Larciprete, R.; Lacovig, P.; Lizzit, S. et al. Local electronic structure and density of edge and facet atoms at Rh nanoclusters self-assembled on a graphene template. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 3034–3043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chagas, T.; Cunha, T. H. R.; Matos, M. J. S.; dos Reis, D. D.; Araujo, K. A. S.; Malachias, A.; Mazzoni, M. S. C.; Ferlauto, A. S.; Magalhaes-Paniago, R. Room temperature observation of the correlation between atomic and electronic structure of graphene on Cu(110). RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 98001–98009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Corso, M.; Greber, T.; Osterwalder, J. h-BN on Pd(110): A tunable system for self-assembled nanostructures? Surf. Sci. 2005, 577, L78–L84.Google Scholar