Durable, superhydrophobic, antireflection, and low haze glass surfaces using scalable metal dewetting nanostructuring
In this paper we report a multifunctional nanostructured surface on glass that, for the first time, combines a wide range of optical, wetting and durability properties, including low omnidirectional reflectivity, low haze, high transmission, superhydrophobicity, oleophobicity, and high mechanical resistance. Nanostructures have been fabricated on a glass surface by reactive ion etching through a nanomask, which is formed by dewetting ultrathin metal films (< 10 nm thickness) subjected to rapid thermal annealing (RTA). The nanostructures strongly reduce the initial surface reflectivity (∼4%), to less than 0.4% in the 390–800 nm wavelength range while keeping the haze at low values (< 0.9%). The corresponding water contact angle (θc) is ∼24.5°, while that on a flat surface is ∼43.5°. The hydrophilic wetting nanostructure can be changed into a superhydrophobic and oleophobic surface by applying a fluorosilane coating, which achieves contact angles for water and oil of ∼156.3° and ∼116.2°, respectively. The multicomponent composition of the substrate (Corning® glass) enables ion exchange through the surface, so that the nanopillars’ mechanical robustness increases, as is demonstrated by the negligible changes in surface morphology and optical performance after 5,000-run wipe test. The geometry of the nanoparticles forming the nanomask depends on the metal material, initial metal thickness and RTA parameters. In particular we show that by simply changing the initial thickness of continuous Cu films we can tailor the metal nanoparticles’ surface density and size. The developed surface nanostructuring does not require expensive lithography, thus it can be controlled and implemented on an industrial scale, which is crucial for applications.
Keywordsnanostructures surface modification antireflective superhydrophobic/philic surfaces self-assembly dewetting
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
12274_2013_320_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1015 kb)
- Hecht, E. Interference. In Optics, 4th ed. Addison-Wesley: San Francisco, 2001; pp 428–431.Google Scholar
- Li, Y. F.; Zhang, J. H.; Zhu, S. J.; Dong, H. P.; Jia, F.; Wang, Z. H.; Sun, Z. Q.; Zhang, L.; Li, Y.; Li, H. B.; Xu, W. Q.; Yang, B. Biomimetic surfaces for high-performance optics. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 4731–4734.Google Scholar
- Morhard, C.; Pacholski, C.; Brunner, R.; Helgert, M.; Lehr, D.; Spatz, J. Antireflective “moth-eye” structures fabricated by a cheap and versatile process on various optical elements. IEEE-NANO 2011, 116–121.Google Scholar
- MacLeod, B. D.; Hobbs, D. S. Low-cost anti-reflection technology for automobile displays. In SID Vehicle Display conference, Canton, USA, 2004.Google Scholar
- Dow Corning® 2634 Coating Product Information Datasheet [Online]. http://www2.dowcorning.com/DataFiles/090007c880276ab9.pdf (accessed Apr 2, 2013)
- Mochel, E. L. Mechanical strengthening of glass by ion exchange. U.S. Patent 3,485,702, Dec. 23, 1969.Google Scholar
- Taflove, A.; Hagness, S. C. Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method; Artech House: Boston, 2000.Google Scholar
© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013