The use of lighting simulation in the evidence-based design process: A case study approach using visual comfort analysis in offices
- 82 Downloads
The EBD-SIM (evidence-based design, simulation) framework is a conceptual framework developed to integrate the use of lighting simulation in the EBD process to provide a holistic performance evaluation method. A real-time case study, executed in a fully operational office building, is used to demonstrate the framework’s performance. The case study focused on visual comfort analysis. The objective is to demonstrate the applicability of the developed EBD-SIM framework using correlations between current visual comfort metrics and actual human perception as evaluation criteria. The data were collected via simulation for visual comfort analysis and via questionnaires for instantaneous and annual visual comfort perception. The study showed that for user perception, the most crucial factor for visual comfort is the amount of light on a task area, and simple metrics such as Eh-room and Eh-task had a higher correlation with perceived visual comfort than complex performance metrics such as Daylight Autonomy (DA). To improve the design process, the study suggests that, among other things, post-occupancy evaluations (POEs) should be conducted more frequently to obtain better insight into user perception of daylight and subsequently use new evidence to further improve the design of the EBD-SIM model.
Keywordsbuilding performance simulation lighting simulation lighting quality visual comfort office field study evidence-based design
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Region Jönköpings Län’s FoU-fond Fastigheter and the Bertil and Britt Svenssons Stiftelse för Belysningsteknik. Also, we would like to acknowledge the valuable comments by the reviewers of the journal of Building Simulation and Professor Christine Räisänen for proofreading the manuscript.
Open access funding provided by Jönköping University.
- Cuttle C (2015). Lighting Design: A Perception-Based Approach. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Davoodi A (2016). Lighting simulation for a more value-driven building design process. Licentiate Thesis, Lund University, Sweden.Google Scholar
- Dillon R, Vischer JC (1987). Derivation of the Tenant Questionnaire Survey assessment method: Office building occupant survey data analysis, Public works Canada.Google Scholar
- Heschong L, Wymelenberg VD, Andersen M, Digert N, Fernandes L, Keller A, Loveland J, McKay H, Mistrick R, Mosher B (2012). IES LM-83-12. Approved Method: IES Spatial Daylight Autonomy (sDA) and Annual Sunlight Exposure (ASE), IES-Illuminating Engineering Society.Google Scholar
- Hygge S, Lofberg H (1997). User evaluation of visual comfort in some buildings of the Daylight Europe Project. In: Proceedings of Right Light Four, the fourth European conference on Energy-Efficient Lighting, Copenhagen, Denmark, vol. 2, pp. 69–74.Google Scholar
- Jakubiec JA, Reinhart CF (2011). DIVA 2.0: integrating daylight and thermal simulations using Rhinoceros 3D, Daysim and Energyplus. In: Proceedings of the 12th International IBPSA Building Simulation Conference, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
- Jakubiec JA, Reinhart CF, Van Den Wymelenberg K (2015). Towards an integrated framework for predicting visual comfort conditions from luminance-based metrics in perimeter daylit spaces. In: Proceedings of the 14th International IBPSA Building Simulation Conference, Hyderabad, India.Google Scholar
- Konis K, Lee E, Clear R (2011). Visual comfort analysis of innovative interior and exterior shading systems for commercial buildings using high resolution luminance images. Leukos, 7: 167–188.Google Scholar
- Malone E, Harmsen C, Reno K, Edelstein E, Hamilton D, Salvatore A (2008). An introduction to evidence based design: Exploring healthcare and design. Concord, CA: The Center for Health Design.Google Scholar
- Peretti C, Schiavon S (2011). Indoor environmental quality surveys. A brief literature review. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Austion, USA.Google Scholar
- Reinhart CF, Mardaljevic J, Rogers Z (2006). Dynamic daylight perormance metrics for sustainable building design. Leukos, 3: 1–25.Google Scholar
- Ruck N, Aschehoug O, Aydinli S, Christoffersen J, Edmonds I, Jakobiak R, Kischkoweit-Lopin M, Klinger M, Lee E, Courret G (2000). Daylight in buildings—A source book on daylighting systems and components. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, USA.Google Scholar
- Stokols D, Scharf T (1990). Developing standardized tools for assessing employees’ ratings of facility performance. In: Davis G, Ventre F (eds), Performance of buildings and serviceability of facilities. Philadelphia, PA, USA: American Society for Testing and Materials.Google Scholar
- USGBC (2008). LEED BD+C: New Construction ∣ v4 — LEED v4: Daylight. Available at https://www.usgbc.org/credits/new-construction-commercial-interiors-schools-new-construction-retail-new-construction-ret-1. Accessed 27 Jan 2019.
- Van Den Wymelenberg KG (2013). Evaluating human visual preference and performance in an office environment using luminance-based metrics. PhD Thesis, University of Washington, USA.Google Scholar
- Velds M, Christofferesen J (2001). Monitoring procedures for the assessment of daylighting performance of buildings. IEA SHC Task 21 “Daylight in Buildings”/ECBCS Annex 29. International Energy Agency.Google Scholar
- Vischer JC, Zeisel J (2008). Bridging the gap between research and design. World Health Design, 2008(July): 57–61.Google Scholar
Open Access: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.