Advertisement

Quantification of the influence of thermal comfort and life patterns on outdoor space activities

  • Dayi LaiEmail author
  • Bingqian Chen
  • Kuixing Liu
Research Article Building Thermal, Lighting, and Acoustics Modeling
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

Urban spaces offer considerable social, health, environmental, and economic benefits to cities and citizens. As a result, attracting more people to urban outdoor spaces is a goal of sustainable urban planning. This study conducted field surveys in a park in Tianjin, in northern China, to study the impacts of thermal comfort and life patterns on the intensity of activity in urban spaces. Analysis of the data found that subjects who engaged in intense activity were less sensitive to cold than to heat. The attendance of people with children exhibited a very high rate of decrease as the thermal environment became unfavorable. When the thermal environment changed from cold to hot, people in the park adapted by moving from open to shaded spaces. This study revealed that different activities followed distinctive patterns. Intense activity occurred mainly in the afternoon, attending to children occurred primarily in the morning, and low-intensity activity happened all day, but its occurrence decreased at noon. By incorporating the impact of thermal comfort and life patterns, this study developed a mixed-influence model to analyze the hourly usage rate in the park. The findings of this study are useful for designers seeking to create sustainable and attractive open spaces.

Keywords

urban open space outdoor activity life patterns thermal comfort urban planning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Shanghai Sailing Program of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality through Grant No. 19YF1424000. This research also receives support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51708400).

References

  1. ASHRAE (2009) ASHRAE Handbook (SI): Fundamentals. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-conditioning Engineers.Google Scholar
  2. Blatteis CM (2012). Age-dependent changes in temperature regulation: A mini review. Gerontology, 58: 289–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bröde P, Fiala D, Błażejczyk K, Holmér I, Jendritzky G, Kampmann B, Tinz B, Havenith G (2012). Deriving the operational procedure for the Universal Thermal Climate Index (UTCI). International Journal of Biometeorology, 56: 481–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chan SY, Chau CK, Leung TM (2017). On the study of thermal comfort and perceptions of environmental features in urban parks: A structural equation modeling approach. Building and Environment, 122: 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen L, Ng E (2012). Outdoor thermal comfort and outdoor activities: A review of research in the past decade. Cities, 29: 118–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chow H-w, Mowen AJ, Wu G-l (2017). Who is using outdoor fitness equipment and how? The case of Xihu Park. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(4): 448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen B (2015). Urbanization, city growth, and the new United Nations development agenda. Cornerstone: The Official Journal of the World Coal Industry, 3(2): 4–7.Google Scholar
  8. Eliasson I, Knez I, Westerberg U, Thorsson S, Lindberg F (2007). Climate and behaviour in a Nordic city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 82: 72–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang J, Zhou C, Zhuo Y, Xu L, Jiang Y (2016). Outdoor thermal environments and activities in open space: An experiment study in humid subtropical climates. Building and Environment, 103: 238–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang T, Li J, Xie Y, Niu J, Mak CM (2017). Simultaneous environmental parameter monitoring and human subject survey regarding outdoor thermal comfort and its modelling. Building and Environment, 125: 502–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kántor N, Unger J (2010). Benefits and opportunities of adopting GIS in thermal comfort studies in resting places: An urban park as an example. Landscape and Urban Planning, 98: 36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kottek M, Grieser J, Beck C, Rudolf B, Rubel F (2006) World map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 15: 259–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lai D, Guo D, Hou Y, Lin C, Chen Q (2014a). Studies of outdoor thermal comfort in northern China. Building and Environment, 77: 110–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lai D, Zhou C, Huang J, Jiang Y, Long Z, Chen Q (2014b). Outdoor space quality: A field study in an urban residential community in central China. Energy and Buildings, 68: 713–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee T, Asawa T, Kawai H, Sato R, Hirayama Y, Ohta I (2017). Multipoint measurement method for air temperature in outdoor spaces and application to microclimate and passive cooling studies for a house. Building and Environment, 114: 267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li K, Zhang Y, Zhao L (2016). Outdoor thermal comfort and activities in the urban residential community in a humid subtropical area of China. Energy and Buildings, 133: 498–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lin TP, Tsai KT, Hwang RL, Matzarakis A (2012). Quantification of the effect of thermal indices and sky view factor on park attendance. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107: 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lin TP, Tsai KT, Liao CC, Huang YC (2013). Effects of thermal comfort and adaptation on park attendance regarding different shading levels and activity types. Building and Environment, 59: 599–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu L, Lin Y, Wang L, Cao J, Wang D, Xue P, Liu J (2017). An integrated local climatic evaluation system for green sustainable eco-city construction: A case study in Shenzhen, China. Building and Environment, 114: 82–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nikolopoulou M, Baker N, Steemers K (2001). Thermal comfort in outdoor urban spaces: Understanding the human parameter. Solar Energy, 70: 227–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nikolopoulou M, Lykoudis S (2007). Use of outdoor spaces and microclimate in a Mediterranean urban area. Building and Environment, 42: 3691–3707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shooshtarian S, Ridley I (2017). The effect of physical and psychological environments on the users thermal perceptions of educational urban precincts. Building and Environment, 115: 182–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Thorsson S, Lindqvist M, Lindqvist S (2004). Thermal bioclimatic conditions and patterns of behaviour in an urban park in Göteborg, Sweden. International Journal of Biometeorology, 48: 149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Thorsson S, Honjo T, Lindberg F, Eliasson I, Lim EM (2007). Thermal comfort and outdoor activity in japanese urban public places. Environment and Behavior, 39: 660–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. United Nations (2014). World Urbanization Prospects. Available at https://doi.org/esa.un.org/unpd/wup/publications/files/wup2014-highlights.Pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2017.
  26. Watanabe S, Ishii J (2016). Effect of outdoor thermal environment on pedestrians’ behavior selecting a shaded area in a humid subtropical region. Building and Environment, 95: 32–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yan D, Xia J, Tang W, Song F, Zhang X, Jiang Y (2008). DeST—An integrated building simulation toolkit. Part I: Fundamentals. Building Simulation, 1: 95–110.Google Scholar
  28. Yang SR, Lin TP (2016). An integrated outdoor spaces design procedure to relieve heat stress in hot and humid regions. Building and Environment, 99: 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yang J, Pantazaras A, Chaturvedi KA, Chandran AK, Santamouris M, Lee SE, Tham KW (2018). Comparison of different occupancy counting methods for single system-single zone applications. Energy and Buildings, 172: 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zacharias J, Stathopoulos T, Wu H (2001). Microclimate and downtown open space activity. Environment and Behavior, 33: 296–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Architecture, School of DesignShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Tianjin Key Laboratory of Indoor Air Environmental Quality Control, School of Environmental Science and EngineeringTianjin UniversityTianjinChina
  3. 3.School of ArchitectureTianjin UniversityTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations