Advertisement

Impact assessment of climate change on buildings in Paraguay—Overheating risk under different future climate scenarios

  • Fabiana SilveroEmail author
  • Camilla Lops
  • Sergio Montelpare
  • Fernanda Rodrigues
Research Article Building Thermal, Lighting, and Acoustics Modeling
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

This research seeks to evaluate the impact of climate change (CC) on the thermal performance of buildings. In particular, it is focused on historical residential buildings located in Asunción, Paraguay, a city characterised by a humid subtropical climate. Energy dynamic simulations of a representative building in its original state and an energy efficient version were assessed to evaluate the effectiveness of common energy retrofit measures under future climate conditions. Low and high Representative Concentration Pathways climate scenarios for 2030, 2050 and 2070 are employed with a CORDEX climate model and compared with observed weather data of 2009. Two thermal comfort assessment methods are considered, the statistic and the adaptive thermal comfort approach, where operative temperatures and overheating and underheating rates are analysed. As expected, the results show that the projected temperature rise will lead to an increment of discomfort rates, but it could be mitigated by energy refurbishment measures. Thus, CC effects on thermal performance of buildings are relevant and must be considered for the development of adaptation strategies able to manage this phenomenon. At present, Paraguay does not have any energy building codes and, instead, the results of this paper underline their needs with a substantial impact on society and building industry of Paraguay since it demonstrates that the creation of energy buildings codes is highly necessary to face CC impact on buildings.

Keywords

climate change building thermal performance comfort assessment methods humid subtropical climate CORDEX 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Professor Alfredo Rocha, Carolina Viceto and Susana Pereira of the Department of Physics of the University of Aveiro (UA) for their advice and assistance in the generation of the climatic dataset from CORDEX. Moreover, we would like to thank Mr Francisco Rivarola and Ms Lourdes Aveiro of the Directorate of meteorology and hydrology of the National Paraguay’s Directorate of Civil Aeronautics (DINAC, by their Spanish initials), for providing us with the observed data from the weather station of Asunción. This project has been funded with support of the European Commission. This publication/communication reflects the view only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein - ELARCH program (Project Reference number: 552129-EM-1-2014-1-IT-ERA MUNDUS-EMA21).

References

  1. Aebischer B, Henderson G, Jakob M, Catenazzi G (2007). Impact of climate change on thermal comfort, heating and cooling energy demand in Europe. In: Proceedings of ECEEE 2007 Summer Study—Saving Energy, pp. 859–870.Google Scholar
  2. Alves CA, Duarte DHS, Gonçalves FLT (2016). Residential buildings’ thermal performance and comfort for the elderly under climate changes context in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Energy and Buildings, 114: 62–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ASHRAE (2001). International Weather for Energy Calculations (IWEC Weather Files) Users Manual and CD-ROM. Atlanta, GA, USA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.Google Scholar
  4. ASHRAE (2010). Standard 55-2010: Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy. Atlanta, GA, USA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.Google Scholar
  5. Aries M, Bluyssen M (2010). Climate Change Consequences for the Indoor Environment in The Netherlands. In: Proceedings of the Effect of Climate Change on Built Heritage, WTA-Colloquium, Eindhoven, the Netherlands, pp. 111–130.Google Scholar
  6. Barbosa R, Vicente R, Santos R (2015). Climate change and thermal comfort in Southern Europe housing: A case study from Lisbon. Building and Environment, 92: 440–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berrisford P, Dee D, Fielding K, Fuentes M, Kallberg P, Kobayashi S, Uppala S (2009). The ERA-Interim Archive. ERA Report Series, 1(1): 1–16. Available at http://www.ecmwf.int/publications/library/do/references/list/782009 Google Scholar
  8. ABNT (2008). NBR 16401: 2008 Instalações de ar-condicionado - Sistemas centrais e unitários - Parte 2: Parâmetros de conforto térmico. Brazilian Association of Technical Standards. Rio de Janeiro: Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  9. ABNT (2013). NBR 15575: 2013 Edificações Habitacionais — Desempenho Parte 1: Requisitos gerais Prefácio. Brazilian Association of Technical Standards. Rio de Janeiro: Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  10. Camilloni I, Cavalcanti I, Ambrizzi T (2006). Escenarios climáticos. In: Barros V, Clarke R, Silva P (eds), El cambio climático en la cuenca del Rio de la Plata. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Ediciones Cima. (in Spanish)Google Scholar
  11. CEDIC, ID (2016). Evaluación de la vulnerabilidad y la capacidad para enfrentar a los desafíos y oportunidades del cambio climático en Paraguay - Escenario RCP 8.5 (Assessment of vulnerability and capacity to face the challenges and opportunities of climate change in Parag). Centro para el desarrollo de la investigación cientifica (CEDIC), & Investigacion para el desarrollo (ID). (in Spanish)Google Scholar
  12. Chalmers P (2014). Climate Change: Implications for Buildings. University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  13. CIBSE (2006). Environmental Design. CIBSE Guide A, 7th edn. London: Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers.Google Scholar
  14. Collins WJ, Bellouin N, Doutriaux-Boucher M, Gedney N, Halloran P, et al. (2011). Development and evaluation of an Earth-system model—HadGEM2. Geoscientific Model Development, 4: 1051–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Comisión Nacional de Cambio Climatico Paraguay (2016). Diseño del Plan Nacional de Adaptación al Cambio Climático. Asunción, Paraguay: Secretary of the Environment of Paraguay. (in Spanish)Google Scholar
  16. CORDEX (n.d.). Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF). Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment. Available at https://esg-dn1.nsc.liu.se/search/cordex. Accessed 25 Apr 2018.
  17. Crawley DB (2008). Estimating the impacts of climate change and urbanization on building performance. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 1: 91–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. de Wilde P, Tian W (2009). Identification of key factors for uncertainty in the prediction of the thermal performance of an office building under climate change. Building Simulation, 2: 157–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Department of Energy U.S. (n.d.). EnergyPlus. Available at https://energyplus.net. Accessed 6 Aug 2018.
  20. DesignBuilder Software (2018). DesignBuilder Software Ltd. Available at https://www.designbuilder.co.uk.
  21. Dirks JA, Gorrissen WJ, Hathaway JH, Skorski DC, Scott MJ, et al. (2015). Impacts of climate change on energy consumption and peak demand in buildings: A detailed regional approach. Energy, 79: 20–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Djamila H (2017). Indoor thermal comfort predictions: Selected issues and trends. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 74: 569–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dodoo A, Gustavsson L (2016). Energy use and overheating risk of Swedish multi-storey residential buildings under different climate scenarios. Energy, 97: 534–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ECLAC (2014). La economía del Cambio Climático en el Paraguay (Climate change economy in Paraguay). Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. Santiago, Chile: United Nations Publication. (in Spanish)Google Scholar
  25. Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Minx J, Brunner S, Agrawala S (2014). Technical Summary. In: Climate Change 2014—Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the fitth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. CEN (2014). EN 15251: Indoor environmental input parameters for the design and assessment of energy performance of buildings. European Committee for Standardization. Available at https://doi.org/CEN/TC 156WG19-N77. STD Version 2.1c.Google Scholar
  27. Facultad de Arquitectura de la Universidad Nacional de Asunción (2005). Análisis de la situacion actual del Centro Histórico de la ciudad de Asunción. Asunción, Paraguay: Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. (in Spanish)Google Scholar
  28. Fanger P (1970). Thermal comfort: Analysis and applications in environmental engineering. Copenhagen: Danish Technical Press.Google Scholar
  29. Frank T (2005). Climate change impacts on building heating and cooling energy demand in Switzerland. Energy and Buildings, 37: 1175–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Giorgi F, Jones C, Asrar GR (2009). Addressing climate information needs at the regional level: The CORDEX framework. World Meteorological Organization Bulletin, 58(3): 175–183.Google Scholar
  31. IPCC (2014). Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2013—The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 1–30). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. IRAM (1996). IRAM 11605: Acondicionamiento térmico de edificios. Condiciones de Habitabilidad en edificios. Valores maximos de transmitancia termica en cerramientos opacos. Argentine Institute for Standardization and Certification. (in Spanish)Google Scholar
  33. Kallakuri C, Vaidyanatha S, Kelly M, Cluett R (2016). The 2016 International Energy Efficiency Scorecard. Washington DC: The American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE).Google Scholar
  34. Kotlarski S, Keuler K, Christensen OB, Colette A, Déqué M, et al. (2014). Regional climate modeling on European scales: A joint standard evaluation of the EURO-CORDEX RCM ensemble. Geoscientific Model Development, 7: 1297–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Levine M, Ürge-Vorsatz D, Blok K, Geng L, Harvey D, et al. (2007). Residential and commercial buildings. In: Climate Change 2007—Mitigation: Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Li DHW, Yang L, Lam JC (2012). Impact of climate change on energy use in the built environment in different climate zones—A review. Energy, 42: 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liu C, Kershaw T, Eames ME, Coley DA (2016). Future probabilistic hot summer years for overheating risk assessments. Building and Environment, 105: 56–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. López V, Lucchese JR, Andreasi WA (2015). Thermal comfort assessment in the hot and humid region of Paraguay: A comparison between three methodologies. International Journal of Civil & Environmental Engineering, 15(6): 26–31.Google Scholar
  39. Lu S, Pang B, Qi Y, Fang K (2018). Field study of thermal comfort in non-air-conditioned buildings in a tropical island climate. Applied Ergonomics, 66: 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lucon O, Ürge-Vorsatz D, Zain Ahmed A, Akbari H, Bertoldi P, et al. (2014). Buildings. In: Climate Change 2014—Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Mapplecroft (2014). Vulnerability Index to climate change in the Latin American and Caribbean Region. Development Bank of Latin America.Google Scholar
  42. Marques Filho EP, Oliveira AP, Vita WA, Mesquita FLL, Codato G, et al. (2016). Global, diffuse and direct solar radiation at the surface in the city of Rio de Janeiro: Observational characterization and empirical modeling. Renewable Energy, 91: 64–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McCartney KJ, Nicol JF (2002). Developing an adaptive control algorithm for Europe. Energy and Buildings, 34: 623–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Melo AP, Fossati M, Versage RS, Sorgato MJ, Scalco VA, Lamberts R (2016). Development and analysis of a metamodel to represent the thermal behavior of naturally ventilated and artificially airconditioned residential buildings. Energy and Buildings, 112: 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ministerio da Economia e do Emprego (2013). Decreto Lei N° 118/2013 de 20 de Agosto - Regulamento de Desempenho Energetico dos Edifícios de Habitaçao (REH). Lisboa: Diario de la Republica, N°159 1ra serie. (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  46. Ministerio de Vivienda y Urbanismo del Gobierno de Chile (2018). Estándares de Construcción Sustentable para viviendas de Chile, Tomo I: Salud y Bienestar (División Técnica de Estudio y Fomento Habitacional). Santiago: de Chile. (in Spanish)Google Scholar
  47. Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico (2015). Decreto Ministeriale 26/6/2015. No. 162. Adeguamento linee guida nazionali per la certificazione energetica degli edifici. Italy. (in Italian)Google Scholar
  48. NOAA (2017). State of the Climate: Global Climate Report for Annual 2015. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Available at https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/201513. Accessed 8 Nov 2017.
  49. Patidar S, Jenkins DP, Gibson GJ, Banfill PFG (2013). Analysis of probabilistic climate projections: Heat wave, overheating and adaptation. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 6: 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Peel MC, Finlayson BL, McMahon TA (2007). Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 4: 439–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pierangioli L, Cellai G, Ferrise R, Trombi G, Bindi M (2017). Effectiveness of passive measures against climate change: Case studies in Central Italy. Building Simulation, 10: 459–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rubel F, Kottek M (2010). Observed and projected climate shifts 1901-2100 depicted by world maps of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 19: 135–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sanford T, Frumhoff PC, Luers A, Gulledge J (2014). The climate policy narrative for a dangerously warming world. Nature Climate Change, 4: 164–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Secretary of the Environment of Paraguay (SEAM) (2011). Segunda Comunicación Nacional Cambio Climático Paraguay (Second National Communication on Climate change Paraguay). Asunción, Paraguay. Available at https://doi.org/1234564879745612. (in Spanish)Google Scholar
  55. SEAM (2014). Paraguay: Plan Nacional de Cambio Climático Fase 1: Estrategia de mitigación. Asunción, Paraguay: Secretary of the Environment of Paraguay. (in Spanish)Google Scholar
  56. SEAM, UNDP, GEF (2017). Tercera comunicación nacional de Paraguay a la Convención Marco de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Cambio Climático. Secretary of the Environment of Paraguay (SEAM), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), & Global Environment Facility (GEF). Asunción, Paraguay: Secretary of the Environment of Paraguay. (in Spanish)Google Scholar
  57. Talukdar S, Banthia N (2016). Carbonation in concrete infrastructure in the context of global climate change: Model refinement and representative concentration pathway scenario evaluation. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 28(4): 04015178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Triana MA, Lamberts R, Sassi P (2018). Should we consider climate change for Brazilian social housing? Assessment of energy efficiency adaptation measures. Energy and Buildings, 158: 1379–1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. UNDP (2007). Cambio Climático: Riesgos, vulnerabilidad y desafio de adaptación en el Paraguay. (Climate change: Risks, vulnerability and adaptation challenges for Paraguay) (Creative Park). United Nations Development Programme, Mercurio. (in Spanish)Google Scholar
  60. van Hooff T, Blocken B, Timmermans HJP, Hensen JLM (2016). Analysis of the predicted effect of passive climate adaptation measures on energy demand for cooling and heating in a residential building. Energy, 94: 811–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. van Vuuren DP, Edmonds JA, Kainuma M, Riahi K, Weyant J (2011a). A special issue on the RCPs. Climatic Change, 109: 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. van Vuuren DP, Edmonds J, Kainuma M, Riahi K, Thomson A, et al. (2011b). The representative concentration pathways: An overview. Climatic Change, 109: 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wan KKW, Li DHW, Lam JC (2011). Assessment of climate change impact on building energy use and mitigation measures in subtropical climates. Energy, 36: 1404–1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wankanapon P, Mistrick RG (2011). Roller shades and automatic lighting control with solar radiation control strategies. Built, 1: 35–42.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fabiana Silvero
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Camilla Lops
    • 2
  • Sergio Montelpare
    • 2
  • Fernanda Rodrigues
    • 1
  1. 1.RISCO, Civil Engineering DepartmentUniversity of AveiroAveiroPortugal
  2. 2.Engineering and Geology DepartmentUniversity G. d’AnnunzioPescaraItaly

Personalised recommendations