Impact of exterior convective heat transfer coefficient models on the energy demand prediction of buildings with different geometry
- 75 Downloads
Accurate models for exterior convective heat transfer coefficients (CHTC) are important for predicting building energy demand. A detailed review of the literature indicates that existing CHTC models take into account the impact of building geometry either incompletely, or not at all. To the best of our knowledge, research on the impact of exterior CHTC models on the predicted energy performance of buildings with different geometry has not yet been performed. This paper, therefore, investigates the influence of CHTC models on the calculated energy demand of buildings with varying geometry. Building energy simulations are performed for three groups: buildings with Hb (building height) > Wb (building width), buildings with Hb < Wb and buildings with Hb = Wb. Six commonly used CHTC models and a new generalized CHTC model are considered. The generalized CHTC model is expressed as a function of Hb and Wb. The simulations are performed for low and high thermal resistances of the building envelope. The results show that the different CHTC models provide significantly different predictions for the building energy demand. While for annual heating demand, deviations of −14.5% are found, for the annual cooling demand a maximum deviation of +42.0% is obtained, compared to the generalized CHTC model. This study underlines the need for the CHTC models to consider building geometry in their expressions, especially for high-rise buildings. For low-rise builgings, the observed deviations between the existing and the generalized CHTC model are less pronounced.
Keywordsconvective heat transfer coefficient (CHTC) building geometry energy demand prediction computational fluid dynamics (CFD) building performance simulation (BPS)
The research is financially supported by the PhD Impulse Program of Eindhoven University of Technology in collaboration with the construction company Heijmans B.V., the Netherlands. The second author is currently a postdoctoral fellow of the Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO) and is grateful for its financial support (project FWO 12M5319N).
- ASHRAE (1981). ASHRAE Handbook-Fundamentals. Atlanta, GA, USA: American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.Google Scholar
- ASHRAE (2005). ASHRAE Handbook-Fundamentals. Atlanta, GA, USA: American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air- Conditioning Engineers.Google Scholar
- Beausoleil-Morrison I (2000). The adaptive coupling of heat and air flow modelling within dynamic whole-building simulation. PhD Thesis, University of Strathclyde, UK.Google Scholar
- Bouwbesluit (2012). Bouwbesluit Nederland. Available at http:// www.bouwbesluitonline.nl/. Accessed 5 Sep 2017.Google Scholar
- Clarke JA (2001). Energy Simulation in Building Design. Oxford, England: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
- Fisher DE, Pedersen CO (1997). Convective heat transfer in building energy and thermal load calculations. ASHRAE Transactions, 103(2): 137–148.Google Scholar
- Hanna SR, Brown MJ, Camelli FE, Chan ST, Coirier WJ, Hansen OR, Huber AH, Kim S, Reynolds RM (2006). Detailed simulations of atmospheric flow and dispersion in downtown Manhattan: An application of five computational fluid dynamics models. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 87: 1713–1726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hensen JLM, Lamberts R (2011). Building Performance Simulation for Design and Operation. London: Spon Press.Google Scholar
- ISSO (2011). Publicatie 32: Uitgangspunten temperatuursimulatieberekeningen. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Stichting ISSO.Google Scholar
- KNMI (2015). Koninklijk Nederlands Meteorologisch Instituut (KNMI). Available at http://www.knmi.nl. Accessed 15 Sep 2017.Google Scholar
- McAdams W (1954). Heat transmission. Tokyo, Japan: McGraw-Hill Kogakusha.Google Scholar
- Meinders ER (1998). Experimental study of heat transfer in turbulent flows over wall-mounted cubes. PhD Thesis, Technische Universiteit Delft, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Meroney RN (1978). Studying the convective heat transfer from a building model with infrared camera techniques. In: Proceedings of ASME Winter Annual Meeting, ASME Paper 78-WA/HT-58, San Francisco, California, USA.Google Scholar
- Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties (2016). Cijfers over wonen en bouwen. Den Haag, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Ministerie van VROM (2009). Energiegedrag in De Woning. Den Haag, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
- NNI (2011). NEN 7120. Energy performance of buildings—Determination method. Delft, the Netherlands: Nederlands Normalisatie-Instituut.Google Scholar
- Nusselt W, Jürges W (1922). The cooling of a flat wall by an airstream (Die Kühlung einer ebenen wand durch einen Luftstrom). Gesundh-Ing, 52: 641–642.Google Scholar
- US Department of Energy (2016). EnergyPlus engineering reference. Available at https://energyplus.net/sites/all/modules/custom/ nrel_custom/pdfs/pdfs_v8.5.0/EngineeringReference.pdf. Accessed 15 Sep 2017.Google Scholar
- Yazdanian M, Klems JH (1994). Measurement of the exterior convective film coefficient for windows in low-rise buildings. ASHRAE Transactions, 100(1): 1087–1096.Google Scholar
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.