Advertisement

Studies and evaluation of bioclimatic comfort of residential areas for improving the quality of environment

  • Ilya Vladimirovich DunichkinEmail author
  • Olga Igorevna Poddaeva
  • Kirill Sergeevich Golokhvast
Research Article
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

The topical issues of computational and experimental studies of wind effects of residential complexes in Moscow are reviewed on the examples of project building objects for verification of design solutions. The continued development of scientific school of architecture and construction aerodynamics is presented as well as its research on the aeration, urban air quality and pedestrian comfort. The results are various comfort criteria actually used in most affluent countries as a guide in the design of apartment houses. As a research method, physical modeling in a wind tunnel and numerical modeling in specialized software complexes are considered. Studies were conducted on the basis of Educational-Scientific-Production Laboratory for Aerodynamic and Aeroacoustic Test Building Constructions (ESPLab AATBC ) using the Large Research Gradient Aerodynamic Tunnel. The results of a comprehensive computational and experimental study of the effect of wind on urban areas are used to develop design solutions (landscaping and urban greening and others) for integrated land improvement to compensate for bioclimatic discomfort.

Keywords

bioclimatic comfort wind tunnel numerical modelling physical modelling residential areas landscaping urban greening 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

All tests were carried out using research equipment of The Head Regional Shared Research Facilities and unique scientific installation “Large Research Gradient Wind Tunnel” of the Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University).

References

  1. Antoniou N, Montazeri H, Wigo H, Neophytou MKA, Blocken B, Sandberg M (2017). CFD and wind-tunnel analysis of outdoor ventilation in a real compact heterogeneous urban area: Evaluation using “air delay”. Building and Environment, 126: 355–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blocken B, Stathopoulos T, van Beeck JPAJ (2016). Pedestrian-level wind conditions around buildings: Review of wind-tunnel and CFD techniques and their accuracy for wind comfort assessment. Building and Environment, 100: 50–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cetin M (2015). Determining the bioclimatic comfort in Kastamonu City. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187: 640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cetin M, Adiguzel F, Kaya O, Sahap A (2018). Mapping of bioclimatic comfort for potential planning using GIS in Aydin. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 20: 361–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dunichkin IV, Zhukov DA, Zolotarev AA (2013). The effect of aerodynamic parameters of high-rise buildings on the microclimate and aeration urban environment. Industrial and Civil Construction, 9: 39–41. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  6. Gaitani N, Mihalakakou G, Santamouris M (2007). On the use of bioclimatic architecture principles in order to improve thermal comfort conditions in outdoor spaces. Building and Environment, 42: 317–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hu K, Cheng S, Qian Y (2018). CFD simulation analysis of building density on residential wind environment. Journal of Engineering Science & Technology Review, 11(1): 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Myagkov MS, Gubernskij JuD, Konova LI, Lickevich VK (2007). City, Architecture, Man and Climate. Moscow: Arhitektura-S. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  9. Naboni E (2014). Integration of outdoor thermal and visual comfort in parametric design. In: Proceedings of the 30th International PLEA Conference, Ahmedabad, India.Google Scholar
  10. Nazarova MV (2016). Wind-protective effectiveness of modular forest linear groups. The Collection of The I International Scientific and Practical Conference “Modern Ecology State Environment and Scientific Practical Aspects Rational of Natural Resources Problems of Agroecology”, pp. 973–976.Google Scholar
  11. Oliveira S, Andrade H (2007). An initial assessment of the bioclimatic comfort in an outdoor public space in Lisbon. International Journal of Biometeorology, 52: 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Poddaeva OI, Buslaeva JS, Gribach DS (2014). Physical model testing of wind effect on the high-rise. Advanced Materials Research, 1082: 246–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Veremchuk LV, Yankova VI, Vitkina TI, Nazarenko AV, Golokhvast KS (2016). Urban Air Pollution, Climate and its Impact on Asthma Morbidity. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine. 6: 76–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Weng Q (2003). Fractal analysis of satellite-detected urban heat island effect. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 69: 555–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ilya Vladimirovich Dunichkin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Olga Igorevna Poddaeva
    • 2
  • Kirill Sergeevich Golokhvast
    • 3
  1. 1.Educational, Scientific and Industrial Laboratory for Aerodynamic and Aeroacoustic Tests of Building Structures, Department of Urban PlanningMoscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University)MoscowRussia
  2. 2.Department of Physics and Building AerodynamicsMoscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University)MoscowRussia
  3. 3.Department of Life Safety in TechnosphereFar Eastern Federal UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations