A simulation-based method for air loop balancing and fan sizing using uncertainty and sensitivity analysis
- 75 Downloads
Two main tasks of commissioning an air-side HVAC system are to verify the fan capacity and to balance the air loop. Simulations can be of assistance to these two tasks. However, the models used in the simulation will inevitably have some uncertainties, especially for the models of the pressure loss components. This paper proposes to use uncertainty analysis to obtain the adjustment instructions for tuning the dampers and the fan pressure value for sizing the fan on a virtual testbed implemented in Modelica. An air-side system with eight terminals, ten dampers and seven junctions is taken as the use case. 24 correction factors for the pressure loss coefficients (PLC) (10 for the dampers, 14 for the junctions) are taken as the inputs for the uncertainty analysis. 1000 samples of the correction factors are generated by using the Latin Hypercube Sampling method. The proportional balancing method is adopted to determine the positions of the damper so that the designed terminal flow rates could be met. The fan pressure value is also determined accordingly. The distributions of the dampers’ positions and fan pressure can be used to guide the balancing work and fan sizing in practice. In addition, the sensitivity analysis reveals that the position adjustments and fan pressure results are more sensitive to the uncertainties of the dampers’ PLCs. When the uncertainty level of the dampers’ PLC is reduced from ±40% to ±10%, the ranges of the damper’s positions will be significantly narrowed down to less than 15%, and the 95th percentiles of the fan pressure will drop from 116Pa to 38Pa, which shows the practicality and benefit of the proposed method.
Keywordscommissioning air loop balancing fan sizing uncertainty analysis sensitivity analysis Modelica modeling
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This research is supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation (Award No. IIS-1802017).
- ASHRAE (2005). ASHRAE Standard. The Commissioning Process. Atlanta, GA, USA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.Google Scholar
- ASHRAE (2009). ASHRAE Handbook—Fundamentals. Chapter 21 Duct Design. Atlanta, GA, USA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.Google Scholar
- ASHRAE (2017). ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 120–2017. Method of Testing to Determine Flow Resistance of HVAC Ducts and Fittings. Atlanta, GA, USA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.Google Scholar
- Crozier B (2000). Enhancing the Performance of Oversized Plant. Application Guide AG 1/2000. BSRIA.Google Scholar
- Fritzson P (1998). Modelica—A language for equation-based physical modeling and high performance simulation. In: Kågström B, Dongarra J, Elmroth E, Wasniewski J (eds), Applied Parallel Computing Large Scale Scientific and Industrial Problems. PARA 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1541. Berlin: Springer. pp. 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hyun S-H, Park C-S, Augenbroe G (2007). Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of natural ventilation in high-rise apartment buildings. In: Proceedings of the 10th International IBPSA Building Simulation Conference, Beijing, China, pp. 1013–1020.Google Scholar
- Idelchik IE, Malyavskaya GR, Martynenko OG, Fried E (1994). Handbook of Hydraulic Resistance. Cleveland, USA: CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Lakshmiraju M, Cui J (2006). Laminar pressure loss coefficient in close coupled fittings. In: Proceedings of ASME 2006 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Chicago, USA, pp. 713–719.Google Scholar
- LBNL (2017). Modelica Buildings Library Version 4.0.0. Available at https://doi.org/simulationresearch.lbl.gov/modelica/.
- Modelica Association (2008). Modelica Standard Library. Mumma SA, Mahank TA, Ke Y-P (1997}). Close coupled ductwork fitting pressure drop. HVAC & R Research, 3 (2): 158–177Google Scholar
- NEBB (2015). Procedural Standard for Testing, Adjusting and Balancing of Environmental Systems, 8th end. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: National Environmental Balancing Bureau.Google Scholar
- Shan K, Wang S, Xiao F, Sun Y (2013). Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of measurements in outdoor airflow control strategies. HVAC&R Research, 19: 423–434.Google Scholar
- Small M (2002). Non-iterative technique for balancing an air distribution system. Master Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.Google Scholar