Building Simulation

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 561–574 | Cite as

Ventilation and energy performance of partitioned indoor spaces under mixing and displacement ventilation

Research Article Indoor/Outdoor Airflow and Air Quality

Abstract

Large variation in indoor air quality (IAQ) and thermal comfort can occur in partitioned office spaces due to heterogeneous air mixing. However, few published studies examined IAQ, thermal comfort, and energy performance of partitioned occupied spaces, which are commonly found in today’s buildings. The objective of this study is to evaluate indoor environmental quality and air conditioning performance of a partitioned room under two typical ventilation modes: (1) mixing ventilation and (2) displacement ventilation. For a total of six representative air-conditioning scenarios, three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are performed to examine temperature distribution, ventilation effectiveness, energy consumption, and local thermal comfort for two partitioned spaces. Simulation results indicate that temperature distribution in a partitioned room is a strong function of ventilation strategy (mixing vs. displacement), but marginally affected by diffuser arrangements. Local age-of-air (air freshness) significantly varies with both diffuser arrangement and ventilation strategy. Regarding energy consumption, displacement ventilation can achieve an indoor set-point temperature in the partitioned spaces about two times faster than mixing ventilation. Under mixing ventilation, the time to achieve a set-point temperature was notably reduced when each partitioned space is served by its own diffuser. For the same supply airflow rate, displacement ventilation can generate local draft risk at ankle level, while mixing ventilation may result in a draft sensation in wider areas around an occupant. Overall, the results suggest that mixing ventilation system can save energy if each partitioned zone is served by its own diffuser such as a multi-split air conditioning. However, when multiple partitioned zones are served by only one diffuser, displacement ventilation is more energy-efficient and can achieve higher ventilation effectiveness than mixing ventilation.

Keywords

computational fluid dynamics indoor partition ventilation effectiveness energy consumption thermal comfort draft risk 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by James L. Henderson Jr. Memorial Endowment Funds of the Pennsylvania State University. The authors thank Jennifer Lather for carefully reviewing the manuscript.

References

  1. Argyropoulos CD, Markatos NC (2015). Recent advances on the numerical modelling of turbulent flows. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 39: 693–732.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ASHRAE (2007). ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62-2007: Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality. Atlanta, GA, USA: American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air-conditioning Engineers.Google Scholar
  3. ASHRAE (2009). ASHRAE Handbook—Fundamentals. Atlanta, GA, USA: American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Airconditioning Engineers.Google Scholar
  4. ASHRAE (2013). ANSI/ASHRAE 55-2013: Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy. Atlanta, GA, USA: American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air-conditioning Engineers.Google Scholar
  5. Awbi HB (1998). Energy efficient room air distribution. Renewable Energy, 15: 293–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Awbi HB (2003). Ventilation of Buildings. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  7. Celik IB, Ghia U, Roache PJ (2008). Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 130: 078001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen H, Janbakhsh S, Larsson U, Moshfegh B (2015). Numerical investigation of ventilation performance of different air supply devices in an office environment. Building and Environment, 90: 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fanger PO, Melikov AK, Hanzawa H, Ring J (1988). Air turbulence and sensation of draught. Energy and Buildings, 12: 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fisk WJ, Faulkner D, Sullivan D, Bauman F (1997). Air change effectiveness and pollutant removal efficiency during adverse mixing conditions. Indoor Air, 7: 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gan G (1995). Evaluation of room air distribution systems using computational fluid dynamics. Energy and Buildings, 23: 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gilani S, Montazeri H, Blocken B (2013). CFD simulation of sensitivity analysis. In: Proceedings of the 13th International IBPSA Building Simulation Conference, Chambery, France.Google Scholar
  13. Hamilton SD, Roth KW, Brodrick J (2004). Displacement ventilation. ASHRAE Journal, 46(9): 56–58.Google Scholar
  14. Heiselberg P (1996). Room air and contaminant distribution in mixing ventilation. ASHRAE Transactions, 102(2): 332–339.Google Scholar
  15. Hu S, Chen Q, Glicksman LR (1999). Comparison of energy consumption between displacement and mixing ventilation systems for different US buildings and climates. ASHRAE Transactions, 105(2): 453–464.Google Scholar
  16. Jiang J (2007). Experimental and numerical study of air flows in a full scale room. PhD Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.Google Scholar
  17. Khan JA, Feigley CE, Lee E, Ahmed MR, Tamanna S (2006). Effects of inlet and exhaust locations and emitted gas density on indoor air contaminant concentrations. Building and Environment, 41: 851–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kuo J-Y, Chung K-C (1999). The effect of diffuser’s location on thermal comfort analysis with different air distribution strategies. Journal of Building Physics, 22: 208–229.Google Scholar
  19. Lau J, Chen Q (2007). Floor-supply displacement ventilation for workshops. Building and Environment, 42: 1718–1730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee H, Awbi HB (2004). Effect of internal partitioning on indoor air quality of rooms with mixing ventilation—Basic study. Building and Environment, 39: 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lim T, Cho J, Kim BS (2010). The influence of ward ventilation on hospital cross infection by varying the location of supply and exhaust air diffuser using CFD. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 9: 259–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lin Z, Chow TT, Fong KF, Tsang CF, Wang Q (2005a). Comparison of performances of displacement and mixing ventilations. Part II: Indoor air quality. International Journal of Refrigeration, 28: 288–305.Google Scholar
  23. Lin Z, Chow TT, Tsang CF, Fong KF, Chan LS (2005b). CFD study on effect of the air supply location on the performance of the displacement ventilation system. Building and Environment, 40: 1051–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lin Z, Chow TT, Tsang CF, Fong KF, Chan LS, Shum WS, Tsai L (2009). Effect of internal partitions on the performance of under floor air supply ventilation in a typical office environment. Building and Environment, 44: 534–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Little AD (1999). Opportunities for energy savings in the residential and commercial sectors with high-efficiency electric motors. Report for US Department of Energy.Google Scholar
  26. Liu S, Novoselac A (2014). Lagrangian particle modeling in the indoor environment: A comparison of RANS and LES turbulence methods (RP-1512). HVAC&R Research, 20: 480–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lo LJ, Novoselac A (2010). Localized air-conditioning with occupancy control in an open office. Energy and Buildings, 42: 1120–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Manning A, Memarzadeh F, Riskowski GL (2000). Analysis of air supply type and exhaust location in laboratory animal research facilities using CFD. ASHRAE Transactions, 106(1): 877–883.Google Scholar
  29. Menter FR (1994). Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal, 32: 1598–1605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nielsen PV (1993). Displacement ventilation. PhD Thesis, Aalborg University, Denmark.Google Scholar
  31. Nielsen PV, Heby T, Moeller-Jensen B (2006). Air distribution in a room with ceiling-mounted diffusers—Comparison with wallmounted diffuser, vertical ventilation, and displacement ventilation. ASHRAE Transactions, 112(2): 498–504.Google Scholar
  32. Novoselac A, Srebric J (2002). A critical review on the performance and design of combined cooled ceiling and displacement ventilation systems. Energy and Buildings, 34: 497–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Posner JD, Buchanan CR, Dunn-Rankin D (2003). Measurement and prediction of indoor air flow in a model room. Energy and Buildings, 35: 515–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rim D, Novoselec A, Morrison G (2009). The Influence of chemical interactions at the human surface on breathing zone levels of reactants and products. Indoor Air, 19: 324–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rim D, Novoselac A (2008). Transient simulation of airflow and pollutant dispersion under mixing flow and buoyancy driven flow regimes in residential buildings. ASHRAE Transactions, 114(2): 130–142.Google Scholar
  36. Rim D, Novoselac A (2010a). Occupational exposure to hazardous airborne pollutants: Effects of air mixing and source location. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 7: 683–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rim D, Novoselac A (2010b). Ventilation effectiveness as an indicator of occupant exposure to particles from indoor sources. Building and Environment, 45: 1214–1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rim D, Schiavon S, Nazaroff WW (2015). Energy and cost associated with ventilating office buildings in a tropical climate. PLoS ONE, 10(3): e0122310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Roache PJ (1994). Perspective: A method for uniform reporting of grid refinement studies. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 116: 405–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roth KW, Westphalen D, Dieckmann J, Hamilton SD, Goetzler W (2002). Energy consumption characteristics of commercial building HVAC systems, vol. III: Energy savings potential. Report for US Department of Energy Building Technologies Program.Google Scholar
  41. Sandberg M (1981). What is ventilation efficiency? Building and Environment, 16: 123–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schiavon S, Rim D, Pasut W, Nazaroff WW (2016). Sensation of draft at uncovered ankles for women exposed to displacement ventilation and underfloor air distribution systems. Building and Environment, 96: 228–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Serra N, Semiao V (2009). Comparing displacement ventilation and mixing ventilation as HVAC strategies through CFD. Engineering Computations, 26: 950–971.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. Shan X, Zhou J, Chang VWC, Yang EH (2016). Comparing mixing and displacement ventilation in tutorial rooms: Students’ thermal comfort, sick building syndromes, and short-term performance. Building and Environment, 102: 128–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sørensen DN, Nielsen PV (2003). Quality control of computational fluid dynamics in indoor environments. Indoor Air, 13: 2–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sørensen DN, Voigt LK (2003). Modelling flow and heat transfer around a seated human body by computational fluid dynamics. Building and Environment, 38: 753–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Walikewitz N, Jänicke B, Langner M, Meier F, Endlicher W (2015). The difference between the mean radiant temperature and the air temperature within indoor environments: A case study during summer conditions. Building and Environment, 84: 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilcox DC (2006). Turbulence Modeling for CFD, 3rd edn. La Cãnada, CA, USA: D C W Industries.Google Scholar
  49. Wu YL, Hsu SP, Sung WP, Hsieh WD (2010). Effect of diffuser design on thermal comfort and ventilation efficiency. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management, 14: 229–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Architectural EngineeringPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental EngineeringDrexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations