Building Simulation

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 211–224 | Cite as

Occupant behaviour simulation for cellular offices in early design stages—Architectural and modelling considerations

Research Article Architecture and Human Behavior
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

Building simulation is most useful and most difficult in early design stages. Most useful since the optimisation potential is large and most difficult because input data are often not available at the level of resolution required for simulation software. The aim of this paper is to addresses this difficulty, by analysing the predominantly qualitative information in early stages of an architectural design process in search for indicators towards quantitative simulation input. The discussion in this paper is focused on cellular offices. Parameters related to occupancy, the use of office equipment, night ventilation, the use of lights and blinds are reviewed based on simulation input requirements, architectural considerations in early design stages and occupant behaviour considerations in operational stages. A worst and ideal case scenario is suggested as a generic approach to model occupant behaviour in early design stages when more detailed information is not available. Without actually predicting specific occupant behaviour, this approach highlights the magnitude of impact that occupants can have on comfort and building energy performance and it matches the level of resolution of available architectural information in early design stages. This can be sufficient for building designers to compare the magnitude of impact of occupants with other parameters in order to inform design decisions. Potential indicators in early design stages towards the ideal or worst case scenario are discussed.

Keywords

occupant behaviour building simulation early design stages cellular office extreme case scenarios modelling resolution 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackerly K, Baker L, Brager G (2011). Window use in mixed-mode buildings: A literature review. Center for the Built Environment Berkeley, CBE Summary Report.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen R, Fabi V, Toftum J, Corgnati SP, Olesen BW (2013). Window opening behaviour modelled from measurements in Danish dwellings. Building and Environment, 69: 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ASHRAE (2010). ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55R—Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy. Atlanta, USA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.Google Scholar
  4. Bordass B, Bromley K, Leaman A (1993). User and occupant controls in office buildings. BRE Research Report in Building Services.Google Scholar
  5. Bourgeois DJ (2005). Modelling occupants and behaviour in building energy simulation. Collection Memoires et theses electroniques, Universite’ Laval, Quebec.Google Scholar
  6. Boubekri M, Boyer LL (1992). Effect of window size and sunlight presence on glare. Lighting Research and Technology, 24: 69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brager GS, Paliaga G, de Dear R (2004). Operable windows, personal control, and occupant comfort. ASHRAE Transactions, 110(2): 17–35.Google Scholar
  8. Brager GS, de Dear RJ (1998). Thermal adaptation in the built environment: A literature review. Energy and Buildings, 27: 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bülow-Hübe H (2000). Office worker preferences of exterior shading devices: A pilot study. In: Proceedings of EuroSun 2000, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
  10. Gunay HB, O’Brien W, Beausoleil-Morrison I (2013). A critical review of observation studies, modeling, and simulation of adaptive occupant behaviors in offices. Building and Environment, 70: 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gunay HB, O’Brien W, Beausoleil-Morrison I, Goldstein R, Breslav S, Khan A (2014). Coupling stochastic occupant models to building performance simulation using the discrete event system specification formalism. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 7: 457–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Escuyer S, Fontoynont M (2001). Lighting controls: A field study of office workers’ reactions. Lighting Research and Technology, 33: 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. EU-Energy-Star (2014). EU-Energy-Star Database, Energy Calculator. Available at http://www.eu-energystar.org/en/en_008.shtml. Accessed 10 Jan. 2014.Google Scholar
  14. Fabi V, Andersen RV, Corgnati S, Olesen BW (2012). Occupants’ window opening behaviour: A literature review of factors influencing occupant behaviour and models. Building and Environment, 58: 188–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foster M, Oreszczyn T (2001). Occupant control of passive systems: The use of venetian blinds. Building and Environment, 36: 149–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fritsch R, Kohler A, Nygard-Ferguson M, Scartezzini J-L (1990). A stochastic model of user behaviour regarding ventilation. Building and Environment, 25: 173–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Galasiu AD, Veitch JA (2006). Occupant preferences and satisfaction with the luminous environment and control systems in daylit offices: A literature review. Energy and Buildings, 38: 728–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gritzki R (2001). Bestimmung der Effektivität nutzerbedingter Fensterlüftung mit Hilfe numerischer Simulationsverfahren. Osnabrück, Germany: Der andere Verlag. (in German)Google Scholar
  19. Haldi F, Robinson D (2008). On the behaviour and adaptation of office occupants. Building and Environment, 43: 2163–2177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haldi F, Robinson D (2009). Interactions with window openings by office occupants. Building and Environment, 44: 2378–2395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hall M (2004). Untersuchungen zum thermisch induzierten Luftwechselpotential von Kippfenstern. Doctoral Thesis, University of Kassel, Germany. (in German)Google Scholar
  22. Heerwagen J (2000). Green buildings, organizational success and occupant productivity. Building Research & Information, 28: 353–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heerwagen JH, Kampschroer K, Powell KM, Loftness V (2004). Collaborative knowledge work environments. Building Research & Information. 32: 510–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hensen J, Lamberts R (2011). Building Performance Simulation for Design and Operation. London: Son Press.Google Scholar
  25. Herkel S, Knapp U, Pfafferott J (2008). Towards a model of user behaviour regarding the manual control of windows in office buildings. Building and Environment, 3: 588–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoes P, Hensen JLM, Loomans MGLC, de Vries B, Bourgeois D (2009). User behavior in whole building simulation. Energy and Buildings, 41: 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hong T, Lin H-W (2012). Occupant behavior: Impact on energy use of private offices. In: Proceedings of 1st IBPSA Asia Conference (ASim 2012), China.Google Scholar
  28. Hopkinson RG (1970). Glare from windows. Construction Research and Development Journal, 2: 98–105.Google Scholar
  29. Hopkinson RG (1972). Glare from daylighting in buildings. Applied Ergonomics, 3: 206–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hunt DRG (1979). The use of artificial lighting in relation to daylight levels and occupancy. Building and Environment, 14: 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Illuminating Engineering Society (IES) (2003). Light in Design—An Application Guide, IES CP-2-10. Available at http://www.ies.org/PDF/Education/LightInDesign.pdf. Accessed 27 Jun. 2014.Google Scholar
  32. Inkarojrit V (2005). Balancing comfort: Occupants’ control of window blinds in private offices. PhD Thesis, University of California, USA.Google Scholar
  33. Jin Q, Overend M (2014). Sensitivity of facade performance on early stage design variables. Energy and Buildings, 77: 457–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Korjenic A, Bednar T (2011). Impact of lifestyle on the energy demand of a single family house. Building Simulation, 4: 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mahdavi A, Kabir E, Mohammadi A, Lambeva L, Pröglhöf C (2006). User interactions with environmental control systems in Buildings. In: Proceedings of 23rd Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture (PLEA2006), Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  36. Mahdavi A, Mohammadi A, Kabir E, Lambeva L (2008). Shading and lighting operation in office buildings in Austria. A study of user control behaviour. Building Simulation, 1: 111–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martin AJ (1996). Control of natural ventilation. Technical Note TN11/95, The Building Services Research and Information Association (BSRIA).Google Scholar
  38. Moore T, Carter DJ, Slater AL (2002). A field study of occupant controlled lighting in offices. Lighting Research and Technology, 34: 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moore T, Carter DJ, Slater AL (2003). Long term patterns of use of occupant controlled office lighting. Lighting Research and Technology, 35: 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Newsham GR (1994). Manual control of window blinds and electric lighting: Implications for comfort and energy consumption. NRCC-37021, National Research Council Canada.Google Scholar
  41. Osterhaus W (2008). Analysis of luminance histograms for the assessment of discomfort glare in daylit offices. In: Proceedings of Balkan Light Conference, Ljubljana, Slovenia.Google Scholar
  42. Page J (2007). Simulating occupant presence and behaviour in buildings. PhD Thesis, Ecole Polytechnique Fe’derale de Lausanne, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  43. Page J, Robinson D, Morel N, Scartezzini J-L (2008). A generalised stochastic model for the simulation of occupant presence. Energy and Buildings, 40: 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Peng C, Yan D, Wu R, Wang C, Zhou X, Jiang Y (2012). Quantitative description and simulation of human behavior in residential buildings. Building Simulation, 5: 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rea MS (1984). Window blind occlusion: A pilot study. Building and Environment, 19: 133–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Reinhart CF (2004). Lightswitch 2002: A model for manual and automated control of electric lighting and blinds. Solar Energy, 77: 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reinhart CF, Voss K (2003). Monitoring manual control of electric lighting and blinds. National Research Council Canada. Available at http://irc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/ircpubs. Accessed 10 Jan. 2014.Google Scholar
  48. Rijal HB, Tuohy P, Nicol F, Humphreys MA, Samuel A, Clarke J (2008a). Development of an adaptive window-opening algorithm to predict the thermal com-fort, energy use and overheating in buildings. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 1: 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rijal HB, Tuhoy P, Humphreys M, Nicol JF, Samuel A, Raja IA, Clarke J (2008b). Development of adaptive algorithms for the operation of windows, fans and doors to predict thermal comfort and energy use in Pakistani buildings. ASHRAE Transactions, 114(2): 555–573.Google Scholar
  50. Rijal HB, Tuohy P, Humphreys MA, Nicol JF, Samuel A (2011). An algorithm to represent occupant use of windows and fans including situation specific motivations and constraints. Building Simulation, 4: 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Roetzel A, Tsangrassoulis A, Dietrich U, Busching S (2009). A review of occupant control on natural ventilation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14: 1001–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Roetzel A (2009). Balancing comfort expectations and greenhouse gas emissions, thermal comfort in office buildings in a changing climate. PhD Thesis, HafenCity University Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar
  53. Roetzel A, Tsangrassoulis A, Dietrich U, Busching S (2010). Balancing buildings and occupants—A holistic approach to thermal comfort and greenhouse gas emissions in mixed mode offices. In: Proceedings of Conference: Adapting to Change: New Thinking on Comfort, NCEUB, Windsor, UK.Google Scholar
  54. Roetzel A, Tsangrassoulis A, Dietrich U, Busching S (2011). Context dependency of comfort and energy performance in mixed mode offices. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 4: 303–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Roetzel A, Tsangrassoulis A, Dietrich U (2014). Impact of building design and occupancy on office comfort and energy performance in different climates. Building and Environment, 71: 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rubinstein F, Colak N, Jennings J, Neils D (2003). Analyzing occupancy profiles from a lighting controls field study. LBNL 52344, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA.Google Scholar
  57. Schweiker M, Haldi F, Shukuya M, Robinson D (2012). Verification of stochastic models of window opening behaviour for residential buildings. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 5: 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Seifert J (2005). Zum Einfluss von Luftströmungen auf die thermischen und aerodynamischen Verhältnisse in und an Gebäuden. Tönning, Germany: Der andere Verlag. (in German)Google Scholar
  59. Shehabi A, Masanet E, Price H, Horvath A, Nazaroff WW (2011). Data center design and location: Consequences for electricity use and greenhouse-gas emissions. Building and Environment, 46: 990–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sun HS, Lee SE (2006). Case study of data centers’ energy performance. Energy and Buildings, 38: 522–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sutter Y, Mumortier D, Fontoynont M (2006). The use of shading systems in VDU task offices: A pilot study. Energy and Buildings, 38: 780–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tsangrassoulis A (1997). Air mass and visible radiation transfer through partly covered building openings. PhD Thesis, Athens. Available at http://www.ekt.gr. (in Greek)Google Scholar
  63. Tuaycharoen N, Tregenza PR (2007). View and discomfort glare from windows. Lighting Research and Technology, 39: 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. EnergyPlus (2007). EnergyPlus Manual, Version 2. U.S. Department of Energy.Google Scholar
  65. Velds M (2000). Assessment of lighting quality in office rooms with daylighting systems. PhD Thesis, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  66. von Grabe J (2013). Flow resistance for different types of windows in the case of buoyancy ventilation. Energy and Buildings, 65: 516–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. von Grabe J, Svoboda P, Bäumler A (2014). Window ventilation efficiency in the case of buoyancy ventilation. Energy and Buildings, 72: 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wang D, Federspiel C, Rubinstein F (2005). Modeling occupancy in single person offices. Energy and Buildings, 37: 121–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wang C, Yan D, Jiang Y (2011). A novel approach for building occupancy simulation. Building Simulation, 4: 149–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yun GY, Steemers K (2008). Time-dependent occupant behaviour models of window control in summer. Building and Environment, 43: 1471–1482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Yun GY, Tuohy P, Steemers K (2009). Thermal performance of a naturally ventilated building using a combined algorithm of probabilistic occupant behaviour and deterministic heat and mass balance models. Energy and Buildings, 41: 489–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Architecture and Built EnvironmentDeakin University, Geelong Waterfront CampusGeelongAustralia

Personalised recommendations