Advertisement

Building Simulation

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 229–236 | Cite as

Building energy simulation and optimization: A case study of industrial halls with varying process loads and occupancy patterns

  • Bruno Lee
  • Marija Trcka
  • Jan L. M. Hensen
Research Article Building Thermal, Lighting, and Acoustics Modeling

Abstract

Industrial halls are mainly low-rise rectangular-shaped structures of simple construction. The relatively loose requirements in space conditioning and the comparatively high internal heat gain make the approach in industrial hall design quite different from that of office building design. The simplicity in building geometry and construction method allows the investigation of energy consumption for building services to be limited to a few demand-side parameters, namely, resistance of the roof and wall insulation, airtightness, and amount of daylighting. This paper investigates the impact of varying these demand-side parameters on the energy consumption for space conditioning and lighting for a typical industrial hall. Through building energy simulation, such impacts can be investigated, and by applying optimization, the configurations of the most optimal combinations of demand-side parameters with the lowest energy consumption can be identified. The result suggests that there is a significant energy-saving potential. For industrial halls, energy consumption for building services can be very sensitive to changes in the process load and occupancy pattern, which in reality, fluctuate widely due to economic cycles, and other factors. Optimized design solutions for industrial halls intended for a particular process load and occupancy pattern might not perform as predicted due to potential changes. To account for potential changes, uncertainty analysis can be performed to determine if the optimized design solutions are in fact robust enough to such changes and to identify solutions that are less susceptible to uncertainty.

Keywords

industrial halls energy performance simulation optimization uncertainty analysis energy consumption robustness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ARAB (2006). Artikel 148, Titel II—Algemene bepalingen betreffende de arbeidshygiëne alsmede de veiligheid en de gezondheid van de arbeiders. Brussels: Algemeen Reglement voor de arbeidsbescherming.Google Scholar
  2. ASHRAE (2007a). Standard 90.1—Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.Google Scholar
  3. ASHRAE (2007b). Standard 62.1—Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality. Atlanta: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers.Google Scholar
  4. CEN (2002). EN 12464-1, Light and Lighting—Lighting of Work Places—Part 1: Indoor Work Places. Brussels: Comité Européen de Normalisation.Google Scholar
  5. CIBSE (2004). CIBSE Guide F: Energy Efficiency in Buildings. London: Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers.Google Scholar
  6. Eurostat (2011). Final Energy Consumption, by Sector. Available: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/energy/data/main_tables, Accessed May 11, 2011.Google Scholar
  7. ISSO (2002). Handboek Installatietechniek. Rotterdam: Instituut voor Studie en Stimulering van Onderzoek op het gebied van gebouwinstallaties.Google Scholar
  8. LLNL (2010). Estimated U.S. Energy Use in 2009. Livermore, USA: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.Google Scholar
  9. Poles S, Rigoni E, Robic T (2004). MOGA-II performance on noisy optimization problems. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Bioinspired Optimization Methods and Their Applications, Ljubljana, Slovenia, pp. 51–62.Google Scholar
  10. Rubinstein F, Xiaolei L, Watson DS (2010). Using dimmable lighting for regulation capacity and contingency reserves in the ancillary services market. A Feasibility Study. PIER Buildings End-Use Energy Efficiency Program.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Taguchi G, Clausing D (1990). Robust quality. Harvard Business Review, 68(1): 65–75.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Tsinghua University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Materials innovation institute (M2i)Delftthe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of the Built EnvironmentEindhoven University of Technology (TU/e)Eindhoventhe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations