Contaminant ingress into multizone buildings: An analytical state-space approach
- First Online:
The ingress of exterior contaminants into buildings is often assessed by treating the building interior as a single well-mixed space. Multizone modelling provides an alternative way of representing buildings that can estimate concentration time series in different internal locations. A state-space approach is adopted to represent the concentration dynamics within multizone buildings. Analysis based on this approach is used to demonstrate that the exposure in every interior location is limited to the exterior exposure in the absence of removal mechanisms. Estimates are also developed for the short term maximum concentration and exposure in a multizone building in response to a step-change in concentration. These have considerable potential for practical use. The analytical development is demonstrated using a simple two-zone building with an inner zone and a range of existing multizone models of residential buildings. Quantitative measures are provided of the standard deviation of concentration and exposure within a range of residential multizone buildings. Ratios of the maximum short term concentrations and exposures to single zone building estimates are also provided for the same buildings.
Keywordsindoor dispersion exposure multizone shelter-in-place state space
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Armour T (2011). European study group with industry 80: Analytical solutions for compartmental models of contaminant transport in enclosed spaces. Technical Report, Industrial Mathematics KTN.Google Scholar
- Jacquez JA (1996). Compartmental Analysis in Biology and Medicine, 3rd edn. Ann Arbor, MI, USA: BioMedware.Google Scholar
- van Leeuwen D (1992). Protection against toxic substances by remaining indoors. In: Methods for the Determination of Possible Damage to People and Objects Resulting from Releases of Hazardous Materials CPR 16E (Green Book, Chapter 6). Voorburg, The Netherlands: TNO.Google Scholar
- Parker S, Coffey C (2011). Analytical solutions for exposures and toxic loads in well-mixed shelters in support of shelter-in-place assessments. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 192: 419–422.Google Scholar
- Persily A, Musser A, Leber D (2006). A collection of homes to represent the U.S. housing stock. Technical Report, NISTIR 7330, National Institute of Standards and Technology.Google Scholar
- Persily A, Davis H, Emmerich SJ, Dols WS (2009). Airtightness evaluation of shelter-in-place spaces for protection against airborne chemical and biological releases. Technical Report, NISTIR 7546, National Institute of Standards and Technology.Google Scholar
- Walton GN, Dols WS (2010). CONTAMW user guide and program documentation. Technical Report, NISTIR 7251, National Institute of Standards and Technology.Google Scholar